| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Confirmation hearings for Judge Mukasey | Washington D.C. | View |
This document is the second page of a letter filed on August 6, 2025, by a victim in the Epstein/Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The author expresses deep frustration with the DOJ and FBI regarding the lack of transparency, the sealing of documents, and the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a minimum-security prison. The victim demands access to evidence seized from Epstein's properties, supports Senator Wyden's financial investigation, and questions the official narrative of Epstein's suicide.
A legal opinion filed on December 23, 2020, by French attorney William Julié regarding the extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Julié argues that under French law and the Extradition Treaty (referencing a past interpretation by Senators Durbin and Obama), there is no absolute rule against extraditing nationals and that the French government would likely execute an extradition decree against Maxwell. The document also cites the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement as further justification for cooperation.
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
This document is a legal opinion filed in December 2020 (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case), authored by French lawyer William Julié. It argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of its nationals to the US, citing the 'Peterson case' and a 2010 EU-US agreement. The document specifically references Ghislaine Maxwell, concluding it is unlikely France would refuse to extradite her, and quotes a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama supporting discretionary extradition.
Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley write to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip requesting a review of federal involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein case, which they characterize as a 'quintessentially state matter.' They criticize a previous 'limited' review conducted by CEOS at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, alleging it ignored professional misconduct by federal prosecutors and failed to assess the Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
A letter from attorney Robert K. Kelner to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence responding to a subpoena issued to Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn. The letter invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to decline the production of documents regarding Flynn's communications with Russian officials and the Trump campaign.
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or draft (dated 4.2.12) discussing the separation of church and state in the United States. The author cites Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration of Independence, and the Treaty of Tripoli to argue against the notion of the US as a 'Christian nation,' and recounts a 1988 controversy in Arizona where Republicans attempted to pass a resolution declaring it as such.
This document is a confidential letter dated May 19, 2008, from attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip. The attorneys represent Jeffrey Epstein and are requesting a review of federal involvement in his case, characterizing it as a 'quintessentially state matter.' They argue that a recent review by CEOS was insufficient because it ignored allegations of professional misconduct by federal prosecutors in the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office and failed to assess the Deferred Prosecution Agreement.
This document is a briefing paper or political risk analysis (marked with a House Oversight footer) outlining six specific 'Threats' regarding the normalization of relations between the US and Cuba. It analyzes the political instability of the aging Castro regime, the economic risks posed by the potential collapse of Venezuelan subsidies, and the legal complexities regarding confiscated properties and the Helms-Burton Act. The document warns that investing in Cuba carries high risk due to potential future instability and legal challenges from exiled property owners.
This document is a web article discussing the 2018 U.S. Senate campaign of Bob Hugin in New Jersey. It details his professional background as a former executive at the pharmaceutical company Celgene, presenting it as both a cornerstone of his campaign and a potential liability due to public anger over high drug prices. Although the prompt described it as 'Epstein-related,' the content of this specific document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028415,' does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any related matters.
This document is the underlying data file for a New York Times article published on September 24, 2018, about G.O.P. Senate candidate Bob Hugin's career at the pharmaceutical company Celgene. The document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028414', includes a photo caption from a 2014 Celgene event in Summit, N.J., attended by Hugin, Representative Leonard Lance, and former Governor Chris Christie. The content of this specific document does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a digital news report, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028399, dated September 24, 2018. It details Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh's response to sexual misconduct allegations, including quotes from a letter he sent vowing not to withdraw, and Senator Mitch McConnell's defense of him on the Senate floor. The document is about the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity