S.R.
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victimizer victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | S.R.'s status as a victim of a federal offense was confirmed when she was interviewed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness Intimidation Incident | S.R.'s home, Florida | View |
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Upcoming civil trial for S.R. vs Epstein | Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Victim identification | S.R. was identified as a victim via the FBI's investigation. | N/A | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Interview attempt | The FBI attempted to interview S.R., who refused to provide information. | N/A | View |
018.pdf
This document is a Motion for Stay filed by defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in a civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe. They argue that a stay is mandatory under federal law because of a pending federal criminal investigation/action (the deferred prosecution agreement). Attached is a declaration from AUSA A. Marie Villafana detailing the government's interaction with victims (T.M., C.W., S.R.) and providing copies of notification letters sent to them and their attorneys regarding their rights and the non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004701.jpg
This legal document, filed in 2021, describes events in September and October 2007 surrounding a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It details that victims were not consulted before the agreement, which deferred prosecution to Florida, and outlines subsequent attempts to notify them, including an FBI interview attempt with victim S.R. and contact with victim C.W.
DOJ-OGR-00004700.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (affidavit) detailing the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a significant conflict of interest where Epstein paid the legal fees for James Eisenberg, who was representing T.M., a victim/witness in the case. The text also outlines the Summer 2007 negotiations resulting in the controversial non-prosecution agreement, where federal prosecution was deferred in favor of state charges to preserve federal remedies for victims.
DOJ-OGR-00004699.jpg
This legal document, part of an affidavit by an Assistant U.S. Attorney, describes the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein that began in 2006. It focuses on the process of notifying victims, specifically mentioning letters sent by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI to victims C.W., T.M., and S.R. The document confirms these three individuals, represented by attorney Bradley Edwards, were minor victims of Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021939.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or testimony. An attorney explains their decision not to contact Alan Dershowitz before filing a pleading, citing fear that Dershowitz would tip off Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker expresses concern that tipping off Epstein would lead to intimidation or life-threatening tactics against their client, Virginia Roberts, who had been hiding in Australia to escape him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021938.jpg
This document is a rough draft transcript page (115) from a House Oversight proceeding. A speaker details an incident of witness intimidation where a large private investigator hired by Jeffrey Epstein parked outside the Florida home of a witness named 'S.R.' and shone high-beams into her house just days before a trial. The intimidation caused S.R. to flee her home, and the speaker discusses legal motions filed to protect her and concerns regarding communications with Mr. Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021937.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely prepared for the House Oversight Committee. The speaker discusses the legal landscape in 2010 regarding a civil suit brought by a victim identified as 'S.R.' against Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while most victims (approx. 31 of 35) referenced in the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) had settled, S.R.'s case was heading to trial, which presented an 'explosive situation' threatening to expose Epstein's crimes and organization in open court.
Unknown
Letter sent to S.R.
Information regarding Jeffrey Epstein
The FBI attempted to interview S.R. in October 2007, but she refused to provide any information regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity