DOJ-OGR-00004701.jpg
586 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
586 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed in 2021, describes events in September and October 2007 surrounding a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It details that victims were not consulted before the agreement, which deferred prosecution to Florida, and outlines subsequent attempts to notify them, including an FBI interview attempt with victim S.R. and contact with victim C.W.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject of prosecution |
Mentioned throughout as the subject of an agreement, prosecution, and enumerated offenses.
|
| T.M. | Victim |
Described as being openly hostile to the prosecution of Epstein in September 2007.
|
| S.R. | Victim |
The FBI attempted to interview her in October 2007, but she refused to provide information regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Attorney Edwards | Attorney |
Mentioned as representing clients (victims) who had not expressed a desire to be consulted prior to the resolution of...
|
| C.W. | Victim |
One of four victims contacted in October 2007. She was not represented at the time and was given notice of the agreem...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of prosecution |
Full name mentioned in the context of an FBI interview attempt with S.R.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | government agency |
Party to an agreement with Mr. Epstein, required to provide a list of victims to his attorneys.
|
| FBI | government agency |
Attempted to interview victim S.R. in October 2007.
|
| State of Florida | government agency |
The agreement involved deferring prosecution to the State of Florida.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2007-09
An agreement was reached regarding the prosecution of Mr. Epstein, which contained an express confidentiality provision.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The agreement deferred prosecution to this location.
|
Relationships (4)
T.M. is identified as a victim in the context of Epstein's prosecution, though she was hostile to it.
S.R. is identified as a victim whom the FBI sought to interview regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
C.W. is identified as one of the victims contacted after the agreement was signed.
The document states, "None of Attorney Edwards' clients had expressed a desire to be consulted..."
Key Quotes (1)
"Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."Source
— The agreement
(A provision from the agreement detailing the intent regarding the standing of identified victims.)
DOJ-OGR-00004701.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,094 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 293-4 Filed 05/25/21 Page 5 of 5
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 4 of 21
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 4 of 21
had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
6. An agreement was reached in September 2007. The Agreement contained an express confidentiality provision.
7. Although individual victims were not consulted regarding the agreement, several had expressed concerns regarding the exposure of their identities at trial and they desired a prompt resolution of the matter. At the time the agreement was signed in September 2007, T.M. was openly hostile to the prosecution of Epstein. The FBI attempted to interview S.R. in October 2007, at which time she refused to provide any information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. None of Attorney Edwards' clients had expressed a desire to be consulted prior to the resolution of the federal investigation.
8. As explained above, one of the terms of the agreement deferring prosecution to the State of Florida was securing a federal remedy for the victims. In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provisions were discussed. One of those victims was C.W. who at the time was not represented, and she was given notice of the agreement. Notice was also provided of an expected change of plea in October 2007. When Epstein's attorneys learned that some of the victims had been
-4-
09/12/2019 Page 3120 Agency to Agency Request: 19-411
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331519
DOJ-OGR-00004701
CONFIDENTIAL
SDNY_GM_00331519
DOJ-OGR-00004701
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document