DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009801.jpg
This document is the preliminary statement of a memorandum filed by the United States Government on March 11, 2022, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The Government argues that Maxwell has failed to meet the heavy burden required to prove juror misconduct during voir dire. The text cites legal precedents to support the finality of trials and argues the motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00009799.jpg
This document is the cover page for the United States Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial. It was filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York under case number S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists United States Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach as counsel for the government.
DOJ-OGR-00009795.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) recording the voir dire process. The Court is questioning Juror No. 50, a 35-year-old Manhattan resident who works as an executive assistant in finance and has held that role since graduating college in 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00009785.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 643-1) from Case 20-cr-00039-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. It is a blank continuation page from a questionnaire for Juror ID 50, providing space for additional answers. The Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00009785' suggests it is a Department of Justice record.
DOJ-OGR-00009784.jpg
This document is a declaration page from a Jury Questionnaire for Case 20-cr-00038-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. On November 4, 2021, Juror Number 50 signed the declaration, affirming under penalty of perjury that their answers were truthful and completed without assistance or discussion with others.
DOJ-OGR-00009783.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answers 'No' to Question 51, indicating that they do not require any of their answers to remain confidential or private from the public record.
DOJ-OGR-00009780.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-00039-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. Juror 50 indicates that neither they nor a family member have ever been involved in activism related to sex trafficking or similar issues. The juror also states they would have no difficulty assessing the credibility of a law enforcement witness fairly.
DOJ-OGR-00009776.jpg
This document is page 19 of a jury selection questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The juror indicates they have heard about the case via CNN.com, specifically noting they read that Maxwell was Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriend, but affirms they have not formed an opinion on her guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00009770.jpg
This document is page 13 of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 24, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answered 'No' to questions regarding whether they or their family have been subjects of grand jury investigations, victims of crimes, or parties to legal disputes involving US government agencies like the FBI or NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00009768.jpg
This document is page 11 of a filled-out juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, answers 'No' to questions regarding prior jury service (Questions 18-19), involvement in court cases as a witness/defendant/victim (Question 20), and involvement in government investigations (Question 21). The document bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00009767.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror 50 in case 2:20-cr-00030-ABN, filed on March 24, 2022. The juror indicates they have no feelings or opinions about law enforcement searches or expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms they have no reservations about their ability to follow strict instructions to avoid all media and not discuss the case outside the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00009764.jpg
This document is page 6 (labeled as -7- in the footer) of a jury questionnaire filed on February 24, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The respondent, Juror ID 50, answers 'No' to questions regarding scheduling conflicts, language barriers, medical conditions, or medication that would prevent them from serving on the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009762.jpg
This document is a schedule and instruction sheet provided to prospective Juror 50 for the trial associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the dates for jury selection (Nov 16-19, 2021) and the start of the trial (Nov 29, 2021), while emphasizing that the jury will not be sequestered and that standard financial hardships are insufficient grounds for excuse.
DOJ-OGR-00009759.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit 1' of Document 642-1, filed on February 24, 2022, in case number 2020R00330-ABN. The page includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number, indicating it is part of a legal or governmental record.
DOJ-OGR-00009757.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 65 of 66) of a legal filing (Document 642) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It lists the defense counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Bobbi Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg
This document is page 63 of a legal filing (Document 642) from March 11, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues that submissions by 'Juror No. 50' should remain sealed because they lack merit, the juror has shown a 'lack of reliability' and 'appetite for publicity,' and releasing them could compromise an ongoing investigation into juror misconduct. The document concludes with a legal argument regarding the importance of *voir dire* in ensuring an impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009744.jpg
This document is page 52 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated March 11, 2022. It argues that 'Juror No. 50' provided false answers during voir dire regarding social media usage to hide biases and ensure selection, noting he later used Twitter to contact victim Annie Farmer and appeared in an ITV documentary. The text contrasts this behavior with Juror No. 55, whose falsehoods were exposed through follow-up questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00009737.jpg
This document is page 45 of a legal filing (Document 642) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text presents legal arguments regarding 'Inferred bias' and 'Actual bias' in jurors, citing the precedent case 'Torres' extensively. It argues that bias should be inferred when a juror's past experiences or conduct closely approximate that of the defendant, implying this legal standard applies to the current case (likely referring to Juror 50 in the Maxwell trial).
DOJ-OGR-00009728.jpg
This document is page 36 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It presents a legal argument specifically concerning 'Juror No. 50,' asserting that had the juror answered Questions 25 and 48 truthfully, they would have been challenged for cause. The text relies heavily on case law citations (McDonough, Wainwright, Stewart) to define legal standards for juror impartiality and materiality of false answers.
DOJ-OGR-00009723.jpg
This document is page 31 of a legal filing (Document 642) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It contains legal arguments regarding a motion for a new trial, specifically discussing the legal standards for juror misconduct and false answers during voir dire (jury selection). The text cites precedents such as United States v. Langford and McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood.
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 642) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, specifically highlighting that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their personal histories of sexual abuse during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The page references a New York Times article from January 5, 2022, and contains a significant redaction in the footnotes.
DOJ-OGR-00009715.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated March 11, 2022, concerning the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It presents evidence of social media activity, including tweets from journalist Lucia Osborne-Crowley about her interview with a juror named 'Scotty', and a responsive tweet from 'annie farmer'. The document highlights that 'Juror No. 50' (presumably Scotty) subsequently interacted with Farmer's tweet, suggesting this interaction is relevant to the legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00009714.jpg
This document appears to be page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated March 11, 2022. It details a transcript or account of an interview where 'Juror No. 50' is challenged regarding the accuracy of his jury questionnaire responses concerning sexual abuse victimization (specifically question 48). The text notes the juror's physical reaction (flushing red) and his verbal defense claiming honesty. It transitions to a section regarding the juror's social media activity involving Annie Farmer and journalist Ms. Osborne-Crawley.
DOJ-OGR-00009709.jpg
This document is page 17 of a 66-page legal filing (Document 642) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. The substantive content of the page is entirely redacted, making its specific subject matter indeterminable. A Bates number in the footer (DOJ-OGR-00009709) suggests it is part of a document production from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00009707.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 was dishonest about deleting his Instagram account and his ability to be impartial, noting he posted about the trial post-verdict. The defense explains they did not ask follow-up questions during voir dire because the juror denied bias, contrasting this with other jurors who disclosed abuse histories.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity