DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015177.jpg
This document is a signature and notary page for a "General Release" legal document, executed on October 3, 2020. The claimant's name has been redacted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), but their attorney is identified as Sigrid McCawley. The document was notarized by Yanet Alvarado in Travis County, Texas on the same date.
DOJ-OGR-00015172.jpg
This document is a claim form for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, dated June 26, 2020. It is signed by 'SM', a legal representative, on behalf of a claimant whose name has been redacted. The form was notarized by Deborah Cuffe in Broward County, Florida on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
This document is page 24 of a court filing (likely an order or opinion) in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text discusses a legal analysis regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, weighing the defendant's (Maxwell) opposition against the public interest. The Court concludes that the specific factor of 'public interest' weighs decisively against unsealing because the materials consist of summary testimony by law enforcement that is already public record due to the trial, and lacks the historical significance found in cases like the Rosenbergs or Alger Hiss.
DOJ-OGR-00015147.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing dated August 11, 2025, discussing the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials related to Ghislaine Maxwell based on 'special circumstances' and public interest in the Epstein investigation. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum regarding the Government's review of the investigation and notes that a separate court in the Southern District of Florida recently denied a similar motion on July 23, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00015142.jpg
This document, filed on August 11, 2025, details the procedural timeline regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts and exhibits in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines communications between the Court, the Government, and Maxwell between July 29 and August 5, 2025, specifically noting Maxwell's opposition to unsealing the transcripts and the Government's efforts to notify victims.
DOJ-OGR-00002441.jpg
This document is a cover page for 'Exhibit E' in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It was filed on February 4, 2021, and is designated as 'FILED UNDER SEAL', indicating its contents are confidential. The page includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number, DOJ-OGR-00002441.
DOJ-OGR-00002439.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit C' from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. The document is marked as 'FILED UNDER SEAL', indicating its contents are confidential. A Bates number at the bottom, 'DOJ-OGR-00002439', suggests it originated from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002438.jpg
This document is a placeholder page for 'Exhibit B' filed in the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) on February 4, 2021. The actual contents of the exhibit are not visible as they were filed under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002437.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for "Exhibit A" in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. The cover sheet indicates that the exhibit itself was "Filed Under Seal," meaning its contents are not available to the public. The document is marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00002421.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It includes a transcript excerpt where Maxwell denies giving massages to anyone, specifically including Epstein and '[Minor Victim-2],' and discusses her knowledge of Epstein's sexual activities involving a 'blond and brunette.' The document also references a ruling by Judge Preska in the civil case regarding the unsealing of Maxwell's July 2016 deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00002404.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for "Exhibit F" from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. The document explicitly states that the exhibit was "FILED UNDER SEAL," indicating its contents are confidential. A Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number is present at the bottom.
DOJ-OGR-00002403.jpg
This document is a placeholder cover page for 'Exhibit E' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The actual content of the exhibit was filed under seal on February 4, 2021, and is not visible. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00002401.jpg
This document is the cover page for Exhibit C, filed as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on February 4, 2021. The document is explicitly marked as 'FILED UNDER SEAL', signifying its confidential nature. A Bates number at the bottom, DOJ-OGR-00002401, suggests it is a document from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002390.jpg
This document is a page from a legal order in a court case, filed on March 4, 2016. It details the procedures for handling discovery materials designated as 'CONFIDENTIAL' or 'HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY', including the responsibilities of the designating party, non-parties, and the process for returning or destroying such materials at the conclusion of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002388.jpg
This document is page 5 (electronic page 11 of 18) of a legal filing from Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell), filed on March 4, 2016. It outlines terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding the sharing of deposition contents and the requirement to file a 'Motion to Seal' for confidential information. A significant portion of the text is struck through, indicating the removal of a clause that allowed parties to object to confidential designations and placed the burden on the designating party to justify the confidentiality in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002388(1).jpg
This document is page 5 (filed as page 11 of 23) of a legal filing, specifically a Protective Order from Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines procedures for handling confidential information, specifically requiring a Motion to Seal when filing such documents. A significant portion of the text regarding the objection process for confidential designations has been struck through (redlined), indicating it was removed or edited during the drafting process.
DOJ-OGR-00002385(1).jpg
This document is page 3 of a Protective Order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case between Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. The document contains redline edits that significantly expand the scope of the order to protect the privacy of 'any non-party that was subject to sexual abuse' and explicitly allows confidential information to be used in 'investigations by law enforcement.' The text defines what constitutes confidential information and begins listing who may access it.
DOJ-OGR-00002384(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a Proposed Protective Order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-07433-RWS) in the SDNY. The document outlines the limitations of confidentiality protections during discovery, specifically noting protections for sensitive personal information regarding sexual abuse victims. It includes visible track-changes/strikethroughs removing language about 'annoying' or 'embarrassing' parties, and contains formatting metadata on the right sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00002382(1).jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on March 4, 2016, in a legal case (referenced by case numbers 1:15-cv-07433-RWS and 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley certifies that she electronically filed a document and served it upon attorney Laura A. Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. via the CM/ECF system. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00002381(1).jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. It lists attorneys Sigrid McCawley, David Boies, and Ellen Brockman with their respective office addresses in Florida and New York. The header indicates this document relates to civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and was later filed as an exhibit in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00002378.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit B', filed on February 4, 2021, as part of the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The footer includes a Bates number, DOJ-OGR-00002378, indicating it is a document produced by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002375.jpg
Page 5 of 7 (or 45 of 67 in the larger filing) from a Protective Order in the civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). The text outlines legal procedures for designating deposition testimony as confidential, filing confidential materials under seal in the Southern District of New York, and the process for objecting to confidential designations.
DOJ-OGR-00002374(1).jpg
This document is page 3 (or 4 depending on the filing version) of a Protective Order from the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS). It outlines the protocols for handling 'CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION,' specifically requiring counsel to obtain written acknowledgments from third parties before disclosure and defining the legal representations made when marking a document as confidential. The page bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002374).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity