DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002205(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a court order filed on December 23, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the defendant to docket redacted documents related to a renewed motion for bail by the same day, citing case law that supports redactions to protect third-party privacy interests.
DOJ-OGR-00002199.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing submitted by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley on December 18, 2020. It concludes an argument urging the Court to keep Ghislaine Maxwell incarcerated until her trial, citing concerns that she might escape justice or abuse children again if released.
DOJ-OGR-00002198.jpg
This document is a formal letter from Annie Farmer to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. Farmer describes her personal victimization by Maxwell and argues that Maxwell is a flight risk, lacks empathy or remorse, and exhibits psychopathic behavior.
DOJ-OGR-00002192.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's release by distinguishing her case from precedents where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and aligning it with cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho, and a 2001 case United States v. Epstein). The 'United States v. Epstein' cited here refers to a 2001 case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania involving a defendant with German/Brazilian dual citizenship, used here as legal precedent for denying bail based on lack of extradition treaties.
DOJ-OGR-00002192(1).jpg
This document is page 31 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text presents a legal argument supporting the detention of the defendant by distinguishing her case from previous instances where bail was granted (Khashoggi, Bodmer) and comparing her to cases where detention was upheld due to flight risk and foreign ties (Boustani, Patrick Ho). Notably, it cites a 2001 case, 'United States v. Epstein,' as precedent for denying bail based on dual citizenship and lack of extradition treaties; however, this 2001 citation likely refers to a different defendant named Epstein (in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) rather than Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002188.jpg
This document is a page from a Government filing opposing bail (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It argues the defendant is a flight risk due to sophisticated financial maneuvering, specifically transferring millions of dollars into trusts for her spouse to hide her true wealth ($20M+) while claiming to have only $3.4M. It highlights a lack of candor with Pretrial Services regarding her assets and the ownership of her New Hampshire residence.
DOJ-OGR-00002184(1).jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell), citing her proven ability to evade detection. The prosecution details how she hid her identity by purchasing a home through a trust, using aliases with real estate agents, and registering finances and phones under false names following Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00002175(1).jpg
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government argues that documentary evidence and witness testimony will 'virtually indisputably' prove that the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein interacted with minor victims at specific times and places. The document also references a 'Renewed Bail Motion' filed by the defense, though the specific arguments regarding that motion are largely redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00002171.jpg
This page is from a legal filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the defendant is not explicitly named in the body text. The text outlines legal arguments regarding pre-trial detention, citing the Bail Reform Act and specific statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422, 2423) related to sex offenses involving minors, which create a presumption of detention. It discusses the legal standards for reopening a detention hearing and the burden of proof regarding flight risk, citing precedents from the Second Circuit and S.D.N.Y.
DOJ-OGR-00002171(1).jpg
This page is from a legal filing dated December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the defendant is not explicitly named in the body text. The text outlines legal arguments regarding pre-trial detention, citing the Bail Reform Act and specific statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 2422, 2423) related to sex offenses involving minors, which create a presumption of detention. It discusses the legal standards for reopening a detention hearing and the burden of proof regarding flight risk, citing precedents from the Second Circuit and S.D.N.Y.
DOJ-OGR-00002170(1).jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal filing (Document 100) from December 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text details the Court's reasoning for detaining the defendant pending trial, citing flight risk, the insufficiency of home security/electronic monitoring, and rejecting arguments regarding COVID-19 risks. It also outlines the 'Applicable Law' under the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq.) regarding the standards for pretrial detention.
DOJ-OGR-00002163.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal memorandum filed by the government on December 18, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The memorandum is in opposition to the defendant's renewed motion for release. The contents outline the government's arguments, including the background of the case, applicable law, and a discussion of the offense, evidence, the defendant's characteristics, and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00002153.jpg
This document is page 2 of an affidavit proposed by Ghislaine Maxwell in December 2020 as part of a bail application (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In the document, Maxwell acknowledges her French citizenship but voluntarily and irrevocably waives her right to contest extradition from France to the United States should she be released on bail and subsequently flee. She explicitly consents to extradition under the USA/EU Agreement on Extradition to assure the court she will not use French citizenship to evade US justice.
DOJ-OGR-00002126.jpg
This document is a legal opinion written by French attorney William Julié regarding the extradition of French nationals to the United States. It was requested by Olivier Laude on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to support bail proceedings, arguing that French law permits extradition to the US and that Maxwell intends to waive her rights to fight such extradition in French courts. The document serves to assure US authorities that Maxwell would not be shielded by French non-extradition principles if she were released on bail and fled to France.
DOJ-OGR-00002119.jpg
This document is a single page from a legal filing, specifically the cover page for 'Annex D'. It is page 24 of Document 97-21, filed on December 14, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The page is also marked with a Department of Justice (DOJ) Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00002115.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (indicated by case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the 'Practical Experience' of a legal expert named Mr. Perry, specifically focusing on his history with high-profile extradition cases involving the US, UK, and Russia. The document lists specific case citations where Mr. Perry represented various parties, including the US Government, the Governor of the Cayman Islands, and individual defendants resisting extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00002109.jpg
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the legal viability of Ghislaine Maxwell resisting extradition from the UK to the US. It specifically argues that she would fail to invoke Article 6 (fair trial) or Article 8 (private and family life) of the ECHR to stop extradition. The conclusion begins to state that if she absconded to the UK in breach of US bail, she would likely be denied bail there.
DOJ-OGR-00002098.jpg
This document is page 3 of 29 from a court filing (Document 97-21) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 14, 2020. The text asserts that it is highly unlikely Maxwell could successfully resist extradition to the United States regarding charges from the July 7, 2020 superseding indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002089.jpg
This document is a cover or separator page from a legal filing dated December 14, 2020, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case). The page is titled 'Waiver of Extradition: United Kingdom' and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002089.
DOJ-OGR-00002087.jpg
This is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal document, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, Document 97-19. The document was signed on November 25, 2020, with the signatory attesting that the contents are true to the best of their knowledge. It was subsequently filed with the court on December 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002082.jpg
This document is a timeline infographic filed as a legal exhibit (Document 97-18) in December 2020, illustrating the frequency of contact between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (attorneys Pagliuca, Everdell, and Cohen) and SDNY prosecutors. The timeline covers the period from July 2019 through March 2020, detailing specific phone calls, email exchanges, and in-person meetings at SDNY offices. The graphic aims to demonstrate that the defense was in regular communication with the prosecution leading up to the 2020 dates.
DOJ-OGR-00002077.jpg
This document, a legal filing from December 14, 2020, compiles four news articles from July and August 2019 to illustrate how Ghislaine Maxwell became a prominent media target. The articles from The New York Times, The Washington Post, New York Post, and Vanity Fair depict her deep involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, her alleged role as a recruiter, and her status as a high-profile figure of public interest, even labeling her 'America's Most Wanted Woman'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity