MDC Legal
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Cooperative administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unspecified email sender
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Court order | Judge Nathan ordered the Government to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and respond to the defendant... | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-04 | N/A | MDC legal planning to submit a letter to the Court. | Court | View |
| 2020-12-04 | N/A | Deadline for MDC legal to file a letter with the Court (Friday mentioned in text) | Court | View |
| 2020-11-30 | N/A | USANYS attorneys spoke with MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) legal team, who agreed to a propo... | N/A | View |
EFTA00027429.pdf
An email dated December 4, 2020, with heavily redacted participants. The subject concerns a letter from MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) legal department due that day. The sender notes that MDC legal plans to submit the attached letter ('Ltr_to_Hon_Nathan_12.04.20.pdf') to the Court and proposes a phone call to discuss it that afternoon.
EFTA00013305.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The defense attorney alleges that MDC guards improperly instructed Maxwell not to stand in various parts of her isolation cell under threat of sanction, contradicting previous assurances from MDC Legal. The email also raises issues regarding food quality and technical failures with a discovery disc provided to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001288.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ms. Maxwell. It details complaints about sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks, physical abuse during searches, retaliation by guards, restricted movement within her cell, poor food quality involving melted plastic, and contaminated water.
DOJ-OGR-00020671.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 28, 2023, but detailing events from August 2021. The entries describe several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including the denial of Maxwell's motion for subpoenas and instructions on sealing documents. The docket also records letters filed by both the defense, concerning interference with attorney-client communications at the MDC, and the prosecution (USA), regarding the identification of co-conspirators, along with the judge's orders for the parties to confer on these issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020532.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from August 23, 2021, to August 30, 2021. It details various orders and letters, including the scheduling of a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and the resolution of issues regarding attorney-client video teleconferences.
DOJ-OGR-00020431.jpg
This document contains a series of court docket entries from August 2021 related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding unsealing documents, scheduling a jury trial for November 29, 2021, and addressing attorney-client communication issues at the MDC. It also logs various letters exchanged between the defense counsel and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00010750.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated June 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter from the defendant regarding her access to legal materials needed for sentencing preparation at the MDC. The Court confirms with the MDC Warden that Maxwell has been given access to documents and a writing implement and orders the Government to follow up with the Warden and report back to the Court by 2:00 p.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010475.jpg
This legal document page, filed on June 15, 2022, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-sentence detention conditions were equivalent to 'supermax' confinement. It quotes an email from Supervisory Staff Attorney Sophia Papapetru, which relays MDC Legal's rationale for transferring Maxwell to the general population post-verdict, stating her security needs had changed. The document defines the harsh conditions of supermax confinement to support its claim that Maxwell's treatment was punitive and unjustified.
DOJ-OGR-00002729.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan disputing the government's characterization of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The letter details excessive searches, lack of access to discovery materials, and argues that the strict surveillance is a reaction to BOP negligence regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00020318.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter alleges HIPAA violations regarding the release of Maxwell's medical data and details an incident of physical abuse where a guard shoved Maxwell into an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00002909.jpg
This is page 3 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document alleges that the MDC violated HIPAA by releasing Maxwell's medical info, describes her deteriorating physical condition (failing eyesight, thinning hair), and details an incident where she was physically abused (shoved) by a guard while being moved to an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government claims exists but the defense believes was not recorded.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity