This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 28, 2023, but detailing events from August 2021. The entries describe several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including the denial of Maxwell's motion for subpoenas and instructions on sealing documents. The docket also records letters filed by both the defense, concerning interference with attorney-client communications at the MDC, and the prosecution (USA), regarding the identification of co-conspirators, along with the judge's orders for the parties to confer on these issues.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed multiple orders and endorsements related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case on 8/13/2021 and 8/19/2021.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of multiple court orders, opinions, and letters regarding subpoenas, sealing of documents, attorney-client co...
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Counsel |
Sent a letter on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Nathan regarding disruption of MDC attorney-client video teleco...
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA |
Co-author of a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan regarding the identification of co-conspirators.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA |
Co-author of a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan regarding the identification of co-conspirators.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA |
Co-author of a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan regarding the identification of co-conspirators.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA |
Co-author of a letter from the USA to Judge Nathan regarding the identification of co-conspirators.
|
| Nixon |
Mentioned in the case citation United States v. Nixon, which set factors for proposed subpoenas.
|
|
| Lugosch |
Mentioned in the case citation Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, which articulated a three-part test for sealing do...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SDNY CM/ECF | court system |
Identified as the system generating the document (Southern District of New York Case Management/Electronic Case Files).
|
| USA | government agency |
The prosecution in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by AUSAs, filed a letter regarding co-conspirators.
|
| Second Circuit | court |
Mentioned as the court that articulated the three-part test in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | company |
A party in the case citation Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
| MDC | detention facility |
Metropolitan Detention Center, mentioned in relation to the disruption and interference with attorney-client communic...
|
| BOP | government agency |
Bureau of Prisons, ordered to confer with the Government and MDC Legal regarding attorney-client communication issues.
|
| MDC Legal | legal department |
Ordered to confer with the Government and BOP regarding attorney-client communication issues.
|
| The Government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecution (USA), ordered to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and to respond to the Defendant's letter.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where alleged interference with attorney-client communication occurred.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (4,086 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document