This document is page 830 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It outlines legal standards for intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and negligence in the context of lawsuits related to the September 11, 2001 attacks (specifically the Ashton and Burnett plaintiffs). It significantly addresses banking liability, citing case law to establish that banks generally do not owe a duty to non-customers to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers, nor are they liable for injuries caused by money passing through routine banking services. While the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page; however, the legal precedents regarding banking liability are relevant to investigations into financial institutions that serviced high-risk clients.
This document is page 45 of a Westlaw printout concerning the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses New York legal precedents regarding 'duty of care,' 'negligent entrustment,' and 'material support' to third-party tortfeasors (criminals/terrorists). While the text focuses on 9/11 and gun safety cases, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was used in the House Oversight Committee's investigation, likely as legal precedent to establish liability for financial institutions (financial angels) supporting Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a Table of Authorities, likely from a legal brief or court opinion related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (specifically 2012 WL 257568). It lists various legal precedents (case law) alphabetically from 'Abrahams' to 'Chambers', including high-profile cases such as 'Ashcroft v. Iqbal' and several cases involving 'Obama' regarding detainees. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the page itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity