This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Second Renewed Motion for Leave to Assert Claim for Punitive Damages) in the case of Edwards adv. Epstein (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). The text presents a legal argument regarding the standard for Summary Judgment under Florida law, citing various precedents to argue that the record establishes Edwards's conduct cannot create liability in favor of Epstein. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013401.
This document is page 5 of a legal filing, specifically the 'Argument' section regarding a summary judgment motion. It argues that Edwards is entitled to judgment against Epstein's claim because there are no disputed material facts under Florida law (Rule 1.510(c)). The text cites various legal precedents (Snyder v. Cheezem, Holl v. Talcott, etc.) to establish that Epstein cannot rely on bare assertions to avoid summary judgment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity