JOSÉ A. CABRANES
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-02 | Legal appeal | Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction. | N/A | View |
| 2024-09-17 | Court session | A Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was held, where the de... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2024-09-17 | N/A | Stated Term of the Court of Appeals where the decision was held. | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2023-01-17 | N/A | Court Order granted for extension of time | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | A stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit was held. | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court term held | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held. | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Summary Order issued by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States v.... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
20250117133905126_22-1426.pdf
This document is a formal legal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the conviction and 240-month prison sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell for sex trafficking and related offenses. The court rejected Maxwell's appeal on five grounds, including arguments regarding a non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, juror misconduct, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document also includes a subsequent order from November 2024 denying Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc.
EFTA00019249.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ/SDNY email chain from June 18, 2019, circulating a Washington Post opinion article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein’s scandal of secrecy points to a creeping rot in the American justice system.' The article criticizes the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of wealthy predators like Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, and Leslie Moonves, and calls for the unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's files and new investigations into Epstein's conduct in New York, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. It specifically highlights the role of David Boies in representing victims and criticizes Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for the previous non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00014853.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal opinion (likely from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction. It lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant). The text, authored by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, summarizes Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy related to minors, as well as her sentencing of concurrent prison terms.
DOJ-OGR-00014850.jpg
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000004.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution (Appellee) and the defense (Appellant), and summarizes that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentencing by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00000002.jpg
This is the title page of a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Maxwell (Case No. 22-1426-cr). The document indicates that Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024, by judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00020610.jpg
A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated January 17, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Judge José A. Cabranes granted Maxwell's motion to extend the deadline for filing her brief and appendix to February 28, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00001824.jpg
This document is a Mandate and Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). Issued on November 9, 2020, following an October 19, 2020 term, it lists the presiding judges and legal representation for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense. The document confirms the filing of the order in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021880.jpg
This legal document is a court filing dated December 2, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. It identifies the legal counsel for both the appellant, Maxwell, and the appellee, the United States, and states that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentence from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00021877.jpg
This document is a formal Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on December 2, 2024. It affirms the lower court's June 29, 2022 judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The decision was rendered by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).
DOJ-OGR-00021824.jpg
This is a formal Judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 17, 2024. The document affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant) following her appeal. The decision was rendered by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021797.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It lists the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant) and begins the written opinion by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes regarding Maxwell's appeal of her 2022 conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy involving minors. The text details her conviction statutes and sentences of 60, 120, and 240 months imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00019688.jpg
This is a Summary Order and Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on November 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). The document lists the panel of judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) who presided over the term held on October 19, 2020. It identifies the legal counsel for both the Appellee (US Attorneys including Lara Pomerantz and Maurene Comey) and the Defendant-Appellant (Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.).
DOJ-OGR-00019683.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It lists the judicial panel (Judges Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi) presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). It identifies the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant).
DOJ-OGR-00019677.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the presiding judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) and lists the legal counsel for both the appellee (United States), led by AUSA Lara Pomerantz, and the defendant-appellant (Ghislaine Maxwell), represented by Adam Mueller. The order was issued from the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in New York City.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity