DOJ-OGR-00019683.jpg

570 KB

Extraction Summary

11
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (court order/summary order)
File Size: 570 KB
Summary

This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It lists the judicial panel (Judges Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi) presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). It identifies the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant).

People (11)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant-Appellant
The defendant in the criminal case appealing a decision.
José A. Cabranes Circuit Judge
Presiding judge on the panel.
Rosemary S. Pooler Circuit Judge
Presiding judge on the panel.
Reena Raggi Circuit Judge
Presiding judge on the panel.
Lara Pomerantz Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for the Appellee (USA).
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for the Appellee (on the brief).
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for the Appellee (on the brief).
Karl Metzner Assistant United States Attorney
Counsel for the Appellee (on the brief).
Audrey Strauss Acting United States Attorney
Representing the Southern District of New York.
Adam Mueller Defense Attorney
Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ty Gee Defense Attorney
Counsel for Defendant-Appellant (on the brief).

Timeline (1 events)

2020-10-19
Summary Order issued by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States v. Maxwell
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, New York, NY

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversaries United States
Case caption: United States, Appellee v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant
Adam Mueller Attorney-Client Ghislaine Maxwell
Listed as 'FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'
Lara Pomerantz Attorney-Client/Representation United States
Listed as 'FOR APPELLEE'

Key Quotes (1)

"Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019683.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,438 characters)

Case 20-3061, Document 105, 10/19/2020, 2955220, Page1 of 4
20-3061
United States v. Maxwell
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
SUMMARY ORDER
Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed
on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a
document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an
electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order
must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York,
on the 19th day of October, two thousand twenty.
PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES,
ROSEMARY S. POOLER,
REENA RAGGI,
Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES,
Appellee, 20-3061-cr
v.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
FOR APPELLEE: LARA POMERANTZ, Assistant United
States Attorney (Maurene Comey, Alison
Moe, and Karl Metzner, Assistant United
States Attorneys, on the brief), for Audrey
Strauss, Acting United States Attorney,
Southern District of New York, New
York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: ADAM MUELLER (Ty Gee, on the brief),
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.,
Denver, CO.
1
DOJ-OGR-00019683

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document