| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
juror
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Hearing | A detention hearing conducted by a judicial officer to consider rebuttal evidence against the pre... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Detention hearing | A legal proceeding to determine if a defendant should be detained before trial. The document disc... | N/A | View |
This page is from a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in Case 20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text discusses the legal standards for bail and detention, specifically addressing 'flight risk' and the burden of production. While the court acknowledges the defendant met a limited burden regarding family ties and finances, section B explicitly states that 'The new information does not alter the Court’s initial determination,' implying a denial of the renewed motion for bail based on factors including the nature of the offense (involving a minor victim).
This legal document is a page from a court filing that explains the Court's decision to detain a defendant pending trial. The Court determined that electronic monitoring would be insufficient and rejected the defense's arguments regarding COVID-19 risks. The document then outlines the applicable law for such a decision under the Bail Reform Act, detailing the Government's burden of proof and the factors considered when a defendant is deemed a flight risk.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity