The New Yorker
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021422.jpg
This document outlines specific allegations of sexual misconduct against Lawrence Krauss (identified by his works and the Origins Project). It details incidents on a CFI cruise in 2011 and at the Melbourne Zoo in 2016, noting that while complaints were filed with ASU and ANU, university officials stated there was insufficient evidence or no policy violation found. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021225.jpg
This document is an announcement of the 2019 Hillman Prize winners, likely included in House Oversight files (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021225) due to the inclusion of the Miami Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series. This specific series by Julie K. Brown and Emily Michot is credited with exposing the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the original non-prosecution agreement. The document highlights the impact of various investigative journalism pieces, including reforms in military housing and immigration policy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021218.jpg
This document is an announcement of the 2019 Hillman Prize winners, detailing awards given to journalists for investigative reporting. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named directly, the document is significant to the Epstein case because it lists Julie K. Brown and Emily Michot of the Miami Herald as winners for 'Perversion of Justice,' the investigative series that exposed Epstein's plea deal and reignited the case against him. The document also highlights other winners covering topics like MS-13, the Flint water crisis, and military housing hazards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.jpg
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com, commonly associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The subject line references a 'Call from New Yorker,' likely a media inquiry. The conversation involves Summers confirming he is in Boston and planning to call J, alongside cryptic personal banter involving a comment about 'ovaries' and 'deeds not words'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033448.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'J' / jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject concerns a 'Call from New Yorker,' suggesting a media inquiry, during which they exchange cryptic comments, including Epstein remarking on Summers not having ovaries and Summers noting he is in Boston and will try to call.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033444.jpg
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'J' / jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject line refers to a 'Call from New Yorker,' suggesting a media inquiry. The conversation is cryptic, involving comments about being 'thoughtful' versus 'face to face' and a bizarre exchange where Epstein tells Summers, 'last i looked... you do not have ovaries,' to which Summers replies, 'That is true.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033440.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein's 'jeevacation' address). The subject line references a 'Call from New Yorker,' suggesting a media inquiry. The conversation is philosophical in nature, debating the merits of written communication versus face-to-face interaction, with Summers noting he views a 'serious note' as a 'deed not words.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033440.jpg
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com, an alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The subject line references a 'Call from New Yorker,' suggesting a media inquiry, while the body of the exchange involves a somewhat philosophical debate about the merits of written communication versus face-to-face interaction. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033437.jpg
This document is an email chain from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the address jeevacation@gmail.com, commonly associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The discussion concerns a 'Call from New Yorker' and how Summers should handle a dispute with an unnamed woman. 'J' advises Summers against sending a written note, comparing it to 'retreating into the locker room' or 'trump firing comey,' urging him instead to act with dignity and strength.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033437.jpg
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject line references a 'Call from New Yorker,' but the content focuses on J advising Summers on how to handle a sensitive communication with a third party ('she'), warning him that sending a note instead of meeting face-to-face would be 'like trump firing comey.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.jpg
This document is an email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation revolves around Summers' 'exit strategy' for a relationship with an unnamed woman, with Epstein advising Summers against sending a written note to end things, comparing such an action to 'Trump firing Comey.' Summers mentions a potential future meeting with the woman in Beijing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033435.jpg
An email thread from March 17, 2019, between Larry Summers and 'J' (using the jeevacation@gmail.com alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation revolves around Summers' conflict with an unidentified woman, with Epstein offering advice on how to handle communication and an 'exit strategy,' using analogies to football and Donald Trump firing James Comey. The subject line 'Call from New Yorker' suggests the conversation may have been prompted by media inquiries, though the body text focuses on interpersonal relationship dynamics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033405.jpg
This document is an email thread dated March 17, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'J' and email jeevacation@gmail.com) and Larry Summers. The subject line refers to a 'Call from New Yorker,' suggesting a media inquiry. The conversation includes Epstein checking Summers' location (Boston), Summers agreeing to call, and a bizarre exchange where Epstein remarks that Summers does not have ovaries, to which Summers responds philosophically about 'deed not words.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018462.jpg
This document appears to be a personal essay or blog post reflecting on sexual ethics, specifically critiquing the concept of "value-neutral" sex promoted during the sexual revolution. The author discusses resources like "The Joy of Sex" and "Our Bodies, Ourselves," expressing regret that the emotional weight of sex was not emphasized in their upbringing. The page ends with a block quote from a synopsis of the book "Modern Sex" regarding the failures of the sexual revolution. It bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030432.jpg
This document is an email sent from Glenn Dubin to Jeffrey Epstein on April 15, 2018. The email, with the subject line 'Interesting', contains a link to a New Yorker article about Michael Cohen and the Trump presidency. The document is marked with the identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030432'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028469.jpg
This document contains the raw data for a news briefing, likely from a content management system or API. The briefing covers Christine Blasey Ford's agreement to testify against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and separate reports of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein suggesting to secretly record President Trump. Other news includes pressure for a second Brexit referendum and Comcast's successful bid for Sky.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028449.jpg
This document is a transcript of a news article from circa September 2018, formatted with digital metadata and marked as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028449'. It details political events during the Trump administration, focusing on the sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and President Trump's contemplation of firing Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. The document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028444.jpg
This document is a capture of a digital article from 'The Cut', published on September 24, 2018, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028444'. The article analyzes the cultural and political impact of the #MeToo movement through the lens of Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination, referencing the stories of Deborah Ramirez and Christine Blasey Ford. Although the user prompt requested analysis of an 'Epstein-related document', this specific page does not mention Jeffrey Epstein and is focused entirely on the Kavanaugh confirmation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442.jpg
This document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028442', is a commentary piece from circa late September 2018 analyzing the cultural impact of the #MeToo movement in the context of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation. It focuses on the allegations made by Deborah Ramirez, as reported in The New Yorker, arguing that women are increasingly demanding that their fragmented but deeply felt memories of trauma be taken seriously, even against staunch denials from powerful men. The author contrasts Ramirez's case with the past experiences of Anita Hill and the more recent, tragic story of Amber Wyatt to illustrate a shift in expectations about whose stories are heard and believed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427.jpg
This document is a news article, likely from September 2018, detailing President Trump's frustration with the Republican response to sexual assault allegations against his Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The article covers Trump's public remarks urging a more aggressive defense, the political dynamics of the situation including Christine Blasey Ford's scheduled testimony, and the emergence of a new allegation published by The New Yorker. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028427' suggests this article was collected as evidence for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028402.jpg
This document is a digital news article snippet concerning the 2018 Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh, not Jeffrey Epstein. It details a new allegation of misconduct from a Yale classmate, Ms. Ramirez, and the lack of corroboration found by The New York Times. The text also includes reactions from Republicans, conservative activists like Carrie Severino, and statements from Kavanaugh's legal team refuting the claims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028401.jpg
This document is a data snippet from a digital news article, likely from The New York Times around September 24, 2018, concerning the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It details the release of a letter from accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a responsive letter from Senator Grassley, and the emergence of a new allegation from Deborah Ramirez published in The New Yorker. The text includes direct quotes from the correspondence and descriptions of the events as they unfolded.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028400.jpg
This document is a news article, likely presented as a congressional exhibit, detailing the political response to sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It reports on Kavanaugh's planned Fox News interview to deny the claims, statements of support from Republicans like Senators Hatch and Cotton and President Trump, and the context of Christine Blasey Ford's allegations. The article also outlines the delicate political situation in the Senate, where a few key Republican votes will decide the confirmation outcome.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384.jpg
This document is a raw data file for a New York Times news briefing dated September 24, 2018, not an Epstein-related document. The briefing reports on Christine Blasey Ford's agreement to testify against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the emergence of a second accusation from Deborah Ramirez, which Kavanaugh denied. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028384' indicates it is an exhibit from a U.S. House Oversight Committee document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020433.jpg
This document is page 281 of a report, specifically the endnotes for 'Chapter Thirty: The Consequences for the War on Terror'. It lists nine sources, primarily news articles and interviews from 2013-2015, concerning NSA surveillance, Edward Snowden, and counterterrorism efforts. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity