State
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
UN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
INS
|
Affiliation oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CICIR
|
Institutional link |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional contractor |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Raid on Dr. Spencer's clinic and his subsequent arrest. | Dr. Spencer's clinic | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by the State against The Downs for back rent. | New Mexico | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Defendant's sentencing memorandum and objections to the Pre-Sentence Investigation Report prepare... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: Nat’l Res. Def. Council v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency, 954 F.3d 150 | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2014-04-28 | N/A | Report Generation | N/A | View |
| 1999-09-01 | N/A | Transport of a huge steam-condensation machine (100 tons) from Haifa to Ashdod on Shabbat. | Haifa to Ashdod | View |
| 1979-01-01 | N/A | Establishment of the Washington State China Relations Council | Washington State | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | French state television aired views favorable to the Cultural Revolution. | France | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021563.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on June 29, 2023. The judge finalizes objections, adopts the Pre-Sentence Report (PSR) into the record, and begins to address the disputed sentencing guideline calculation. The judge notes the defense's position that the correct sentence is 51 to 63 months' imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00019200.jpg
This document is a 'Commitment to Another District' filed on July 2, 2020, by the United States District Court, District of New Hampshire, concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. It details charges including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury, alleged to have been committed in the Southern District of New York. The document also notes her bond status and legal representation by Lawrence Vogelman.
DOJ-OGR-00016636.jpg
This document is page 153 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of Professor Loftus by Ms. Sternheim following a lunch break. The testimony focuses on the psychological concept that memory confidence is malleable and can be artificially inflated by confirming information, referencing research by Professor Wells from Iowa State.
DOJ-OGR-00010551.jpg
This document is a page from a government sentencing filing (likely the Government's sentencing memorandum) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details specific instances of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn and a minor named Melissa (recruited by Carolyn at age 16) at Epstein's Palm Beach residence, describing a 'pyramid scheme' of recruitment starting with Virginia Giuffre. The text notes that the US Probation Office recommended a 20-year sentence, characterizing Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory.'
DOJ-OGR-00010538.jpg
This legal memorandum, filed on June 22, 2022, from the United States Government, concerns the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her instrumental role in the sexual abuse of young teenage girls, often in conjunction with Jeffrey Epstein, and highlights the lasting harm inflicted on victims. The document states that Maxwell's sentencing is scheduled for June 28, 2022, and argues for a sentencing range of 360 to 660 months' imprisonment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00009009.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell requesting a new trial. The motion argues that the original trial was unfair because a juror, identified as Juror No. 50, failed to disclose during jury selection (voir dire) that he was a victim of sexual abuse and then used this personal experience to persuade other jurors to convict Maxwell. The filing claims this constitutes juror misconduct and prejudice, violating Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00031550.jpg
This is a legal document filed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding a Motion for Protective Order concerning 'Jane Doe No. 1'. The filing states that the motion is moot because the attorneys (Goldberger and Leopold) agreed to schedule Jane Doe No. 1's deposition for February 20, 2008, with Leopold accepting service on her behalf. The document is dated February 7, 2008, and includes a certificate of service to attorneys Belohlavek, Leopold, and Herman.
DOJ-OGR-00031544.jpg
This document is a legal certification and request signed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger on February 7, 2008. It requests the court deny a Motion for Protective Order as moot because the parties (Goldberger and Theodore Leopold) agreed to reschedule Jane Doe No. 1's deposition to February 20, 2008. The document certifies service to attorneys Lanna Belohlavek, Theodore Leopold, and Jeffrey Herman.
DOJ-OGR-00031232.jpg
This document is a printout of an Albuquerque Tribune article (likely from Dec 2002) detailing campaign contributions to Bill Richardson, specifically from gambling and casino interests. It lists significant donations from The Downs (Paul Blanchard), Riviera Gaming Management, and the Pueblo of Sandia, as well as large funding from the Democratic Governors Association. The document also notes legal issues regarding back rent owed by The Downs to the New Mexico State Fair.
DOJ-OGR-00031231.jpg
This document is an archived printout of an Albuquerque Tribune article detailing campaign contributions to Governor-elect Bill Richardson (likely from late 2002 based on the URL and context). It highlights significant financial support from labor unions ($633,488 total), specifically AFSCME, and gambling interests ($648,392 total), specifically The Downs at Albuquerque. The document appears to be part of a 2017 Public Records Request to the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00031202.jpg
This document is a printout of an Albuquerque Tribune article detailing campaign contributions to Bill Richardson, likely during his run for Governor of New Mexico. It lists significant financial donations from gambling interests, including The Downs (Paul Blanchard), Riviera Gaming, and the Pueblo of Sandia, as well as large sums from the Democratic Governors Association. The text also notes legal issues regarding unpaid rent by The Downs to the State Fair and Richardson's new role as a federal liaison for the DGA.
DOJ-OGR-00010552.jpg
This document is a page from a government legal filing arguing for a harsher prison sentence for a defendant. The prosecution contends that the sentencing calculation should include two additional victims, Virginia Roberts and Melissa, which would increase the offense level from 40 to 42. This change would raise the recommended sentencing range from 292-365 months to 360-660 months' imprisonment, based on the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00010475.jpg
This legal document page, filed on June 15, 2022, argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-sentence detention conditions were equivalent to 'supermax' confinement. It quotes an email from Supervisory Staff Attorney Sophia Papapetru, which relays MDC Legal's rationale for transferring Maxwell to the general population post-verdict, stating her security needs had changed. The document defines the harsh conditions of supermax confinement to support its claim that Maxwell's treatment was punitive and unjustified.
DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00009465.jpg
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his public lectures and service activities. It lists his participation in PBS series, numerous lectures on legal ethics, and significant roles within the American Bar Association and as a consultant for the New Jersey Supreme Court. The activities span from 1989 to at least 2009, highlighting a long career in legal ethics and public service.
DOJ-OGR-00003131.jpg
This legal document page outlines the applicable law concerning the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, specifically addressing multiplicitous charges. It defines a multiplicitous indictment as one that charges a single crime in multiple counts and cites several legal precedents (e.g., North Carolina v. Pearce, United States v. Chacko) to explain that a defendant cannot be punished multiple times for the same offense. The document clarifies the legal standard for a multiplicity claim and the procedural remedies courts should use to protect a defendant's rights.
DOJ-OGR-00004877.jpg
This legal document analyzes D.A. Castor's decision and press release concerning Cosby, asserting that Castor's intent was to induce Cosby's reliance, which led Cosby to testify in Constand's civil case without invoking his Fifth Amendment rights. The text further discusses the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, highlighting the right against self-incrimination as an "essential mainstay" of criminal justice, citing the Supreme Court case *Malloy v. Hogan*.
DOJ-OGR-00004871.jpg
This page is an excerpt from a legal document filed on July 2, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text appears to be from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in *Commonwealth v. Cosby* (indicated by docket [J-100-2020]), which was used by Maxwell's defense to argue about the enforceability of non-prosecution agreements. The text discusses the scope of prosecutorial discretion versus a defendant's due process rights and fundamental fairness, specifically when a defendant relies on a prosecutor's actions to their detriment.
DOJ-OGR-00004869.jpg
This is page 57 of a legal filing (Document 310-1) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text presents legal arguments citing various precedents (including Martinez, Carrillo, and Baird) to establish that non-prosecution agreements should be treated as binding contracts similar to plea agreements. This argument is likely being used to support the defense's claim regarding the applicability of the 2007 Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) held on June 15, 2021. The Court reviews sentencing parameters, including a 40-year statutory maximum and $5 million fine, and lists reviewed documents such as a presentence report by Officer Sandra Vella Garcia, a plea agreement, and sentencing memos from both the government and defense attorney Mr. Donaldson. Attorneys Mr. Chiuchiolo (Government) and Mr. Donaldson (Defense) confirm there are no other written submissions to review.
DOJ-OGR-00031097.jpg
This document is a page from an 'Applicant Dossier' containing Hawaii Driver License details for Sarah Lynnelle Kellen. It includes her personal descriptors (DOB: 05/25/1979, Height: 5'8", Weight: 120 lbs), address in Haleiwa, HI, and a photograph. The document appears to be part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00031097). The issue and expiration dates appear to be database default errors (01/01/1899).
DOJ-OGR-00005769.jpg
This document is a legal filing arguing that accusers in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial should not be referred to as "victims" or "minor victims" to protect the presumption of innocence. The defense contends that using such terms implies a crime has definitely occurred, which biases the jury before a verdict is reached.
DOJ-OGR-00005741.jpg
This document is a page from a defense motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues to prohibit testimony from 'Accuser 4' identifying Maxwell as a perpetrator, claiming that in 2007 FBI interviews and subsequent civil lawsuits against Epstein, the accuser never identified Maxwell and instead identified another individual as the one who took nude photographs. The defense asserts that any current identification is the result of suggestive government procedures.
DOJ-OGR-00005176.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the program integrity and confidentiality rules for a claims resolution program. It details the responsibilities of claimants to provide truthful information, the severe consequences of fraudulent claims including referral to law enforcement, and the strict confidentiality protocols governing how claimant information is handled by the Program Administrator. The document specifies that only very limited information can be shared with 'the Estate' for the purpose of claim evaluation, ensuring claimant privacy is protected.
DOJ-OGR-00005154.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 7, 2021, outlines the integrity and confidentiality protocols for a claims program. It details how the Program Administrator will verify claims to prevent fraud, including reporting suspicious claims to law enforcement, and specifies the strict confidentiality rules governing the handling of a claimant's information, particularly the limited data shared with 'the Estate' for evaluation purposes.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-01 | Paid | State | DONALD J. TRUMP | $1,000,001.00 | Rent income ($100,001 - $1,000,000 range) | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity