| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted (External/Colleague)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Participants]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | USANYS official called the tipster to verify the subject of the information. | Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2019-04-29 | N/A | Meeting regarding the Epstein case (referred to as 'meeting with [Redacted] on Monday'). | Unknown | View |
An email chain from November 9, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Weinstein requests a call to discuss a 'new development' regarding the Epstein Estate. The USANYS officials discuss scheduling amidst a 'deadline' that day, with one official noting they are occupied 'reviewing images at a snail's pace' throughout the day.
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between attorneys Andrew Patel and Jill Shellow, and US Attorneys (SDNY and EDNY), regarding inmate Johnny Contreras. Contreras was housed in the SHU at the MCC across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. While Contreras did not witness the hanging, his lawyers offered his testimony regarding his 'observations,' leading to the scheduling of a proffer session with investigators.
An email chain between the US Attorney's Offices for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York regarding an offer of information from attorney Andrew Patel. Patel represents inmate Johnny Contreras, who was housed in the MCC SHU across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. Contreras offered to speak to investigators about his observations, leading to an attorney proffer on August 20, 2019.
An email chain between USANYS officials discussing a potential inmate cooperator at the MCC. The cooperator claims that another inmate admitted to providing Jeffrey Epstein with the sheets he used to commit suicide. The officials discuss the credibility of this second-hand information and whether to extend a cooperation agreement.
This document is an email chain from October 6, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), the FBI, and the NYPD. The correspondence concerns the organization and transfer of digital evidence, specifically referencing '3500 folders' (likely Jencks Act material) and an attached 'manifest.xlsx', though the content of the manifest is not visible. Technical issues with an empty zip file and the use of 'USAfx' for file transfer are discussed, with a signature block for a Special Agent in the FBI's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit appearing on the second page.
This document is an email thread between USANYS staff members dated February 3, 2020, and January 31, 2020. It concerns the logistical pickup of a signed 'Epstein 6(e) Order' from Judge Nathan's chambers following a notification from the Judge's clerk. The emails discuss coordinating a paralegal to retrieve the document.
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated late January 2020. They are finalizing a 'Sharing Order Part II' regarding the Epstein case, specifically discussing how to characterize new materials received from estate attorneys, including references to a 'Trust Two,' a '2019 Trust,' and will revocations. The team discusses legal nuances of Trust & Estate (T&E) law and plans to submit the order to 'CM' the following Monday.
This document is an email chain from May 7, 2020, between FBI agents (New York and CID) and US Attorneys (SDNY). The correspondence details a handover of duties to a new ASAC for the Violent Crime/Gang Branch and provides a critical status update on the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. Key intelligence shared includes the FBI's belief that Maxwell was living in Manchester by the Sea, confirmed via Amazon subpoenas and pen registers, and that SDNY was close to a final decision on charging her for sex trafficking complicity.
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, among staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails discuss the urgent review and preparation of discovery materials (referred to as 'productions', including '3500' material and 'Rule 16' material) related to the 'USvEpstein' case (specifically the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, denoted as 'GM'). The team was coordinating to load these files onto a hard drive to be sent via FedEx to the defense team before a 4 PM pickup deadline. The document includes internal DOJ network file paths pointing to trial materials.
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between USANYS contractors and legal staff regarding the management of digital evidence in the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details the separation of search warrant returns within the Relativity database, specifically requesting to lock down 397,365 non-responsive documents while keeping 1,218,719 'Identified Responsive' documents accessible for the prosecution team.
This document consists of an email chain dated July 2, 2020, coordinating the distribution of a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle' and a signed affidavit. The correspondence involves the FBI (New York office), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and the US Attorney's Office for New Hampshire (USANH). The date and agencies involved align with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
An email chain from April 12, 2021, between USANYS employees and contractors discussing the technical collection of documents for an investigation. A contractor asks for clarification on whether to pull all emails or specifically those in a folder titled 'Emails Epstein Investigation.' The team agrees on a 'conservative approach' of pulling all emails for a 'second production' or 'second wave' of review.
An email chain between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding a 'Sharing Order' for the Epstein case. The discussion focuses on reviewing and accurately describing recently received estate documents, including wills, 'Trust Two documents,' and a '2019 Trust.' The participants are coordinating to finalize the application and order for submission, likely to a court or another department ('Part I').
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.
This document is a crucial email chain dated May 7, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). It reveals that authorities had tracked Ghislaine Maxwell to a secluded property in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts, months before her July 2020 arrest. The emails confirm SDNY was close to a charging decision for sex trafficking and details the investigative methods used to locate her, including historical pen registers, cell site location data, and subpoenas to Amazon for delivery addresses, as traditional surveillance was deemed difficult due to the location's seclusion.
An internal email thread from January 29, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns updating a 'sharing order application' to include additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys.
Instruction to file and circulate the defense filing.
Sender reports receiving a call from lawyers representing a former female DOJ employee involved in the Epstein NPA. The employee is upset about press coverage and considering a public statement.
Sender discusses the upcoming bail argument before Judge Berman. They express optimism but ask procedural questions about authority to appeal if they lose: whether the decision can be made 'in house' (SDNY) or requires approval from 'DC' (Main Justice).
Email transmitting a PDF attachment regarding government opposition to bail motion for JE (Jeffrey Epstein).
Comment on the breadth of the statute and the value of going to Odeon.
Confirming they can add the victim and contact attorneys for notification preferences. Notes they met the victim for the first time the previous afternoon.
Providing contact info for the victim through her 3 attorneys: Daniel Kaiser, William Kaiser, and Kimberly Lerner.
Thanks. Will raise up.
Forwarding the Bloomberg email 'just in case' the recipient hadn't seen it.
Asking if they can add this person and email attorneys regarding notification system limitations.
Reporter alerting USANYS to a reference in a story about a 'super-secret safe' on Epstein's island.
Reported running into Reid Weingarten at Odeon, who mentioned meeting his client and potentially reaching out for an 'interesting conversation' regarding sex trafficking statutes.
I just pulled it
Confirming meeting at the Hilton in West Palm Beach. Instructions to call upon arrival.
Inquiry about a media tip from The Journal regarding FBI agents at the mansion; sender notes they declined to comment.
Confirmation of the event ('Yes') and affirmation of the decision to decline comment ('But correct to decline').
What’s issue?
Any other edits? Or are we good to finalize the release?
Discussion on wording in FBI Assistant Director's quote regarding location of incidents. Includes full draft text of the quote.
Attached is the final PR for review. Notes that the quote includes the number to call.
Was inevitable. The twitter is all over that paragraph from the detention memo.
I knew this would become the story...
Circulation of NYT article text regarding nude photos seized.
Thanks!
Fine by me. Thanks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity