Redacted (USANYS)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted (External/Colleague)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Participants]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | USANYS official called the tipster to verify the subject of the information. | Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2019-04-29 | N/A | Meeting regarding the Epstein case (referred to as 'meeting with [Redacted] on Monday'). | Unknown | View |
EFTA00019127.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2020, involving Marc A. Weinstein of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Weinstein requests a call to discuss a 'new development' regarding the Epstein Estate. The USANYS officials discuss scheduling amidst a 'deadline' that day, with one official noting they are occupied 'reviewing images at a snail's pace' throughout the day.
EFTA00018959.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019 between attorneys Andrew Patel and Jill Shellow, and US Attorneys (SDNY and EDNY), regarding inmate Johnny Contreras. Contreras was housed in the SHU at the MCC across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. While Contreras did not witness the hanging, his lawyers offered his testimony regarding his 'observations,' leading to the scheduling of a proffer session with investigators.
EFTA00018957.pdf
An email chain between the US Attorney's Offices for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York regarding an offer of information from attorney Andrew Patel. Patel represents inmate Johnny Contreras, who was housed in the MCC SHU across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein at the time of Epstein's death. Contreras offered to speak to investigators about his observations, leading to an attorney proffer on August 20, 2019.
EFTA00018857.pdf
An email chain between USANYS officials discussing a potential inmate cooperator at the MCC. The cooperator claims that another inmate admitted to providing Jeffrey Epstein with the sheets he used to commit suicide. The officials discuss the credibility of this second-hand information and whether to extend a cooperation agreement.
EFTA00018852.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 6, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), the FBI, and the NYPD. The correspondence concerns the organization and transfer of digital evidence, specifically referencing '3500 folders' (likely Jencks Act material) and an attached 'manifest.xlsx', though the content of the manifest is not visible. Technical issues with an empty zip file and the use of 'USAfx' for file transfer are discussed, with a signature block for a Special Agent in the FBI's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit appearing on the second page.
EFTA00018219.pdf
This document is an email thread between USANYS staff members dated February 3, 2020, and January 31, 2020. It concerns the logistical pickup of a signed 'Epstein 6(e) Order' from Judge Nathan's chambers following a notification from the Judge's clerk. The emails discuss coordinating a paralegal to retrieve the document.
EFTA00018080.pdf
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated late January 2020. They are finalizing a 'Sharing Order Part II' regarding the Epstein case, specifically discussing how to characterize new materials received from estate attorneys, including references to a 'Trust Two,' a '2019 Trust,' and will revocations. The team discusses legal nuances of Trust & Estate (T&E) law and plans to submit the order to 'CM' the following Monday.
EFTA00016605.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 7, 2020, between FBI agents (New York and CID) and US Attorneys (SDNY). The correspondence details a handover of duties to a new ASAC for the Violent Crime/Gang Branch and provides a critical status update on the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. Key intelligence shared includes the FBI's belief that Maxwell was living in Manchester by the Sea, confirmed via Amazon subpoenas and pen registers, and that SDNY was close to a final decision on charging her for sex trafficking complicity.
EFTA00016482.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, among staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails discuss the urgent review and preparation of discovery materials (referred to as 'productions', including '3500' material and 'Rule 16' material) related to the 'USvEpstein' case (specifically the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, denoted as 'GM'). The team was coordinating to load these files onto a hard drive to be sent via FedEx to the defense team before a 4 PM pickup deadline. The document includes internal DOJ network file paths pointing to trial materials.
EFTA00016464.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between USANYS contractors and legal staff regarding the management of digital evidence in the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details the separation of search warrant returns within the Relativity database, specifically requesting to lock down 397,365 non-responsive documents while keeping 1,218,719 'Identified Responsive' documents accessible for the prosecution team.
EFTA00016163.pdf
This document consists of an email chain dated July 2, 2020, coordinating the distribution of a 'SDNY Premises Search Warrant Bundle' and a signed affidavit. The correspondence involves the FBI (New York office), the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), and the US Attorney's Office for New Hampshire (USANH). The date and agencies involved align with the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire.
EFTA00015855.pdf
An email chain from April 12, 2021, between USANYS employees and contractors discussing the technical collection of documents for an investigation. A contractor asks for clarification on whether to pull all emails or specifically those in a folder titled 'Emails Epstein Investigation.' The team agrees on a 'conservative approach' of pulling all emails for a 'second production' or 'second wave' of review.
EFTA00015021.pdf
An email chain between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding a 'Sharing Order' for the Epstein case. The discussion focuses on reviewing and accurately describing recently received estate documents, including wills, 'Trust Two documents,' and a '2019 Trust.' The participants are coordinating to finalize the application and order for submission, likely to a court or another department ('Part I').
EFTA00014655.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.
EFTA00013446.pdf
This document is a crucial email chain dated May 7, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). It reveals that authorities had tracked Ghislaine Maxwell to a secluded property in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts, months before her July 2020 arrest. The emails confirm SDNY was close to a charging decision for sex trafficking and details the investigative methods used to locate her, including historical pen registers, cell site location data, and subpoenas to Amazon for delivery addresses, as traditional surveillance was deemed difficult due to the location's seclusion.
EFTA00011146.pdf
An internal email thread from January 29, 2020, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns updating a 'sharing order application' to include additional trust and will documents recently received from Epstein's estate attorneys.
DAG Memos
Sending memos for briefing with Ed. Notes that one memo is from Geoff and one is on recusal matters. Explicitly states: 'After you and I spoke, we realized that we should add Epstein and we have done so.'
RE: Epstein
Phew! Not losing my mind (at least on this one) just yet...thanks for double checking.
Re: Epstein
Request for an update memo regarding 'where we are, what we've done... and next steps' for a meeting on Monday.
Re: Epstein
Stating they are traveling and back on Sunday, suggesting deferring to another colleague.
RE: Epstein
Asking if recipient is at the airport and requesting a chat to align on bullet points before drafting.
Re: Epstein
Requesting an update memo for a meeting with Brad Weinshiemer on Monday regarding case status and next steps. Notes this is internal and not for DC yet.
RE: Epstein
Sender attaches ODAG memo and a memo for Audrey. Notes that another colleague hasn't reviewed it because they are in transit.
Epstein
Sending copy of a memo sent 5 weeks prior regarding Florida NPA, and promising an update memo later that afternoon regarding investigation updates since March.
Re: Epstein
would you be able to do this?
Re: Epstein
[Redacted] is going to meet with Brad Weinshiemer on Monday - can you guys put together an update memo this afternoon on where we are, what we’ve done since the last update memo, and next steps? This just for [Redacted] for now, not for sending down to DC.
Epstein
Request for an update memo regarding the Epstein case ('where we are, what we've done since the last update memo, and next steps') in preparation for a meeting with Brad Weinshiemer.
Re: Epstein
Asking if the recipient is able to do the task.
RE: Epstein
Just spoke with [Redacted] he searched his inbox for notes of calls and sorted out that it's the same person you spoke with, just as you'd thought.
RE: Epstein
Definitely-- can I swing by just to ask a few questions for clarity on format?
RE: Epstein
Sure, I'm in my office.
Epstein staffing
Discussion regarding staffing assignments for the Epstein case, specifically regarding a female employee in the VOC unit and other potential additions.
Unknown (Blank in document)
Request to discuss a forfeiture case involving Epstein.
Chief of Staff
Hi [Redacted] – can you remind me of his name, so I can put on Epstein memo?
RE: Chief of Staff
Content redacted or empty in visible portion.
No Subject
Epstein OK
No Subject
[Redacted] and I have been asked by [Redacted] to present on our campaign finance cases. We're doing NRA, PIC and GEP, all of which have POTUS ties. Do we need to ask [Redacted] to step out?
Re: [Redacted]
Epstein OK
Re: [Redacted]
Russell and I have been asked by Laura to present on our campaign finance cases. We're doing NRA, PIC and GEP, all of which have POTUS ties. Do we need to ask [Redacted] to step out?
Re: [Redacted]
We're going to hold off til next week.
Call with Geoff on Epstein
Header only available. Discusses a call with Geoff regarding Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity