| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Arlan Ettinger
|
President |
1
|
1 |
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 18, 2020. It notifies Darren K. Indyke, as an executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, that a lawsuit has been filed against him and co-executor Richard D. Kahn by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs Indyke to respond to the complaint within 21 days or face a default judgment.
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons is specifically addressed to Richard D. Kahn.
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. It notifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, that they are being sued by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser.
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. ยง 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.
This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.
This document is a formal Summons in a Civil Action filed on October 22, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (represented by Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) and numerous associated corporate entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Laurel Inc, NES LLC, etc.). The summons instructs the defendants to respond within 21 days to avoid a default judgment and lists the plaintiff's legal representation.
This document is a staffing level report for the Bureau of Prisons Northeast Region (NERO) for Pay Period 16 of 2019 (roughly late July/early August). It lists authorized, filled, and vacant positions for various institutions. Notably, the 'NEW YORK' facility (likely MCC New York where Epstein was held) shows the lowest 'On-Board' staffing percentage (84.27%) on the list, indicating significant staff vacancies (39 vacant positions out of 248 authorized) during the period coinciding with Epstein's incarceration and death.
This document is a statistical table titled 'DNA Status of Inmates at Institutions' dated July 8, 2019. It tracks the compliance and status of DNA collection for inmates across various facility codes (including NYM and BRO), categorizing them by needs status, review status, and writ status. The document appears to be an internal Bureau of Prisons record generated shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest (July 6, 2019), showing high numbers of inmates needing DNA processing at NYM (likely MCC New York) and BRO (likely MDC Brooklyn).
This document is a confidential email or message exchange between prison staff dated July 24, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's custody status. The staff discuss an incident involving a 'huge scar' on Epstein's neck, noting ambiguity around it, and justify his placement on Suicide Watch (SW) during a legal visit the previous day. The conversation also compares the overuse of Suicide Watch at MCC New York versus stricter protocols at 'BRO' (Brooklyn) and Chicago facilities.
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from October 9, 2019. It discusses an unsolicited offer from Arlan Ettinger, President of Guernsey's Auctioneers & Brokers, to be retained to handle the auction/disposition of the late Jeffrey Epstein's property. The DOJ officials decide to send a standard polite rejection, noting internally that they do not yet have possession of any properties.
This document contains a 2020 email from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP discussing a FOIA discovery regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Trust. The attached records include a 1993 Power of Attorney appointing John J. Kelly to handle land purchases in New Mexico, and a 1994 New Mexico State Land Office appraisement form. Crucially, the 1994 form is signed by Ghislaine Maxwell, who swears under oath to be a 'disinterested person' while appraising the land for Epstein's lease, despite listing the same Manhattan address (457 Madison Ave) as Epstein.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
This document is a Law360 newsletter dated May 26, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories. Key items include a judge approving a no-jail deferred prosecution agreement for the guards on duty the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, Steve Bannon's fraud indictment being tossed following a pardon, and Alan Dershowitz's defamation suit against CNN proceeding. The newsletter also covers financial settlements, judicial nominations by Cuomo and Biden, and various corporate legal updates.
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP officials. Sternheim acknowledges that Maxwell is now allowed a water mug and snacks but requests she be moved to an interior cell at MDC Brooklyn due to moisture and cold air degrading her legal paperwork and affecting her health. BOP officials circulate the request internally to schedule a discussion.
This document is a Law360 New York legal news digest dated August 27, 2019, summarizing various legal developments, court rulings, and corporate transactions. It covers topics such as robocall litigation, employment suits, securities fraud (including mentions of SAC Capital and Harvey Weinstein), and mergers like the Amgen-Celgene deal. The only connection to the name 'Epstein' in this specific document is a reference to the law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' and its attorneys Jeffrey Ruzal and Carly Baratt; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein the financier or flight logs.
Internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Ccing Alex Acosta) discussing a victims' lawyer's request to void Epstein's plea deal due to additional victims. The AUSA confirms they are bound by the agreement. The email also details a meeting with the Sheriff's Office where it was revealed Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Starr) threatened to sue over unfavorable treatment, and that Epstein would be granted work release despite prior contradictions.
This document is a list of publications (books) authored or co-authored by E.F. Loftus and also details her past affiliations and consultancies with various government agencies, organizations, and legal bodies from 1976 to 2008. The publications listed span from 1973 to 1994, focusing primarily on memory, eyewitness testimony, and psychology, with several international editions and translations noted.
This document appears to be a page (page 95) from a manuscript draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It discusses First Amendment legal theories regarding nudity, pornography, and 'fighting words,' citing Dershowitz's own 2002 book 'Shouting Fire' in a footnote. The document was produced as part of a House Oversight investigation.
This document is a page from a legal filing or court opinion related to the litigation 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' (2012). It details corporate ownership structures and disclosure statements for various entities including BGC Partners, Cantor Fitzgerald, and several insurance companies (CNA, Chubb, One Beacon), identifying parent corporations and ownership percentages. It also notes the dissolution dates for specific financial entities in 2008 and 2010. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity