| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
This document is a log of electronic messages from March 6, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation centers on inviting 'bg' (likely Bill Gates) to an event at Epstein's house, despite a warning from 'Larry' that 'bg' should not have contact with Epstein. Epstein remarks that he likes 'bill,' claims 'bill' benefits more from the relationship than he does, and suggests he should 'grow some balls.'
This document is a log of text messages from March 6, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. They discuss a meeting in D.C. involving 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) and 'Trump' on the 20th or 21st, shifting the topic of discussion from 'war' to 'Cyber,' which the respondent notes 'Israel [is] best at.'
This document is a digital forensic log of a message thread dated March 6, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses arranging a 'learning trip' to the Middle East (specifically Israel, Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar) for an individual referred to as 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) to explore emerging technologies. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating its provenance from a congressional investigation.
This document is a forensic extraction log of digital messages dated March 3, 2017, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details a conversation where a redacted sender complains about receiving 'vicious text messages' from 'Larry' and discusses coordinating emails with 'Bill' to avoid 'games'. The final entry identifies the sender 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com', a known email alias of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a log of instant messages from March 3, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around business frustrations involving individuals named 'Larry' (described as a bottleneck) and 'Bill' (described as squeezing the redacted party). Epstein advises the other party to appease Larry and states that paperwork is 'ONLY to get in,' urging them to stop wasting time.
This document is a log of electronic messages (likely SMS or iMessage) from March 1 and 2, 2017, produced by the House Oversight Committee. The conversation involves an unidentified sender discussing 'Homomorphic Encryption' and medical data analytics, followed by a frustration regarding a professional interaction involving individuals named 'bill' and 'Larry' concerning health care advocacy strategies. The sender expresses annoyance at the redundancy of conversations, noting that strategies 'bill' suggested were already being implemented by others.
This document is a digital communication log from February and March 2017 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted correspondent. The conversation includes a shared news article about the Trump administration proposing budget cuts to development agencies, with the sender noting this would affect 'BG' (likely Bill Gates), the UN, USAID, and the World Bank, commenting that it is 'good news for America.' The thread concludes with Epstein asking 'are we set?' and the correspondent replying 'Not yet' but promising 'This week though.'
This document is a forensic log of text messages exchanged on February 26 and 27, 2017. The messages depict a sender expressing emotional distress and reliance on the recipient, discussing a third party ('he') who is described as demanding of the sender's time and presence to a detrimental degree. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight investigation (027190) and lists the email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' at the bottom.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from February 25, 2017, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation concerns the outcome of a meeting or review, with the redacted party reporting that an unidentified male found the 'scope too narrow' after '5 hours'. Epstein expresses confusion, stating he thought 'Larry' (possibly Larry Summers) wanted a narrow scope focused on 'encryption health info'.
A text message log from February 23, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias often linked to Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses a third party named 'Bill' who 'intervened' to mandate a 6-month period, with clarification that 'it's not firing.' The user 'jeeitunes' notes the organization ('the org') has changed during their 3-year absence.
This document is a digital communication log from the House Oversight Committee investigation, dated February 23, 2017. It captures a conversation between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known Epstein alias) and a redacted individual. The redacted individual discusses receiving an award from 'Hopkins,' expresses nervousness about an upcoming speech in Philadelphia, and mentions that 'bill' will be helping them with the speech the following night.
This document is a digital forensic log of a message exchange on February 23, 2017, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted sender who identifies herself as 'Melanie'. They coordinate a meeting for the following morning at 11:30 AM in New York. Notably, the 'jeeitunes' account mentions they 'May see bg tmr night need to discuss a few things,' referring to a third party.
This document is a log of electronic messages from February 22, 2017, obtained by the House Oversight Committee. The messages are primarily sent by 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and discuss technical concepts including zero-knowledge proofs, blockchain, and wearables for securing personal health data. The sender also defends 'bg' (likely Bill Gates), asking why he 'gets kicked around like this.'
This document is a forensic log of electronic messages from February 2017 involving the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The messages discuss 'health security,' potential overlap with a 'fndn' (foundation), and relay advice from 'Bill' regarding a job title needing 'teeth' to show the role is not just policy-based. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a log of five digital messages exchanged on February 21, 2017. The conversation is between an account associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual, discussing how to frame a concept regarding health information privacy for the 'average American' and 'congress.' The redacted participant asks if 'bills office' can assist with the initiative.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages from February 21, 2017, extracted from a device associated with the email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves Epstein and a redacted individual discussing World Economic Forum (WEF) councils, with one participant remarking that 'No one on council very clever.' The exchange also includes a USA Today opinion piece about Bill Gates, with Epstein adding 'AND THIS --- on gates/as discussed.'
This digital forensic log from the House Oversight Committee contains a series of text messages sent on February 21, 2017. The sender, who identifies herself as 'Melanie' (likely Melanie Walker) on a 'seattle mobile,' shares links regarding blockchain technology, patient data privacy (Wired article), and the World Economic Forum. The messages also reference 'The mayo' (Mayo Clinic) and 'Israel/MIT'.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on February 18, 2017. It involves 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and redacted participants discussing logistics for attending a 'kruase conference' in Tucson. The conversation later shifts to a political critique of foundations ('fndns') spending tax dollars and the application of the 'global gag rule' to philanthropic organizations.
This document contains a log of digital messages from February 18, 2017, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation focuses on financial loopholes regarding foreign charitable grants, specifically mentioning giving to the UN for polio. The redacted participant warns that 'bill' (likely Gates) should be careful because 'donald' (likely Trump) might make an example of him for sending American dollars abroad.
This document is a log of electronic messages from February 18, 2017, predominantly sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com', an email address associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation involves a redacted participant relaying the opinions of a third party ('he') who criticizes 'bill' (likely Bill Gates) for focusing on global issues like malaria, polio, and Ebola rather than American problems, comparing him to 'Chicken Little.' The log also references PEPFAR and implies an agreement was reached ('its a deal').
This document is a message log from February 18, 2017, obtained by the House Oversight Committee. It details a conversation involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeeitunes@gmail.com') where participants discuss 'zero knowledge protocols' and a political strategy to 'convince bill' (likely Bill Gates). Epstein explicitly suggests a quid pro quo arrangement where they could 'get something for BG' if the administration (Trump admin) agrees to keep PEPFAR funding.
This document is a log of electronic messages exchanged on February 18, 2017, between the email address 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (known to be associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves cryptic phrases such as 'Boy Scout leaving camp,' expressions of excitement, and a request to 'Call.' The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee production, indicated by the footer stamp.
This document contains a log of electronic messages exchanged on February 17, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves scheduling availability ('Free after / in about an hour') and a discussion about Bernard J. Tyson, initiated by a link to his Kaiser Permanente bio. The redacted individual comments that an 'MBA / seems more practical than a repurposed MD'.
This document contains a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on February 17, 2017, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation is brief and functional, involving the coordination of a time to speak, with the redacted individual asking if the other party is 'Free?' and mentioning they have 'another call in 15 minutes.' The document originates from a House Oversight investigation.
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage log dated February 17, 2017, between 'jee' (associated with jeeitunes@gmail.com, likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The redacted individual attempts to schedule a call at 12:30 PST/3:30 EST, to which 'jee' responds that he is in Paris. The conversation concludes with the redacted individual offering to call in 35 minutes.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
Expression of support, calling the prosecutor an inspiration and advocate for victims.
Confirmation that there is no dial-in ('No, fortunately').
Question regarding if there is a dial-in for the trial.
Motivational email regarding the upcoming trial opening statements, logistics, and the importance of the case.
Request to reserve a seat for the trial opening.
Confirmation of talking to the team.
Motivational message about the case, contrasting SDNY with Florida prosecutors, outlining the charges against Maxwell, and providing logistical details for the trial opening.
Motivational message regarding the start of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, criticizing Florida prosecutors' past handling, stating the charges relate to 1994 sex crimes, and providing logistical details for the courtroom.
Good Luck, Guys! Go Get 'Em, [Redacted]
Letter re Flatley and their rebuttal expert
Motivational email to the office announcing the opening of the trial, criticizing Florida prosecutors for past inaction, asserting Maxwell's guilt, and providing logistical details for attending the opening statements.
Good luck tomorrow, Andrew! You're going to be great, and it will be such a relief for the victims to finally get a measure of justice. Will be cheering you on!
Expressing lack of fear, calling the crime worthy of prosecution, wishing luck for 'tomorrow'.
Motivational message about the trial, criticizing Florida prosecutors for past inaction, stating Maxwell exploited underage girls, providing logistical details for courtrooms (Main: 318, Overflow: 110, 506, 905, 906) and timing (8:30 a.m.).
Good luck, guys!
Reply wishing luck for the opening statements the next day and expressing hope for justice for the victims.
Forwarding the original email with the message 'Good luck!!!!'
Response saying 'Thank you!'
Sender asks if the attached file 'AJN_draft_instructions.pdf' is what the recipient was referring to, noting they pulled it from PACER because they couldn't find it on the shared drive.
Email distributing press guidance regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically regarding witness pseudonyms and potential penalties.
Asking for clarification on identifying a specific victim by name since she previously waived anonymity.
Stating that per court order, victims testifying under pseudonyms should not be identified, regardless of previous waivers.
Confirmation that issues were sorted out.
More TW 3500 for [Redacted] attached, thanks! Includes embedded attachment: FW: _photo_project.msg
Thanks for the update and Thanksgiving wishes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity