[REDACTED]

Person
Mentions
6261
Relationships
8
Events
11
Documents
2346
Also known as:
[REDACTED] (female) DET [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (payer) Ms. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] (Detective) Brett [REDACTED] [Redacted] (Captain Secretary, USP Leavenworth) [Redacted] (Captain, MCC NY) Him / [Redacted] [Redacted] (Ms.) Mr. [Redacted] (Attorney) [Redacted] (NYPD) [Redacted] (USANYS), [Redacted] (MCC) [Redacted], [Redacted] Traveler [REDACTED] Approver [REDACTED] Maurene [Redacted] (USANYS) [REDACTED] - US

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
8 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Unnamed Witness
Acquaintance
8 Strong
1
View
person Jim Eisenberg
Client
7
1
View
person Speaker 'A'
Co conspirators coordinators
6
1
View
person Unknown
Acquaintance
5
1
View
person Redacted Woman
Client
1
1
View
person Caller/Victim
Client
1
1
View
person Assistant U.S. Attorney
Professional correspondence
1
1
View
person [REDACTED]
Professional supervisory
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. Unspecified View
N/A N/A The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... N/A View
N/A N/A The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... An unspecified location ref... View
N/A N/A A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... Not specified View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... Not specified View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... Undisclosed View
2007-04-24 N/A A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... Undisclosed View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View
2006-08-28 N/A Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... View

EFTA00014170.pdf

An email dated June 17, 2008, from Roy Black to a redacted recipient. Black asks if there is a chance to discuss the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and provides his redacted office and cell phone numbers.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00014151.pdf

An email chain from November 24, 2008, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney. Ann Marie Villafana sent a letter to Roy Black, and a subsequent internal email (with redacted participants) asks, 'Wow --- have you heard anything back?', suggesting anticipation regarding Black's response to the attached letter.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014129.pdf

An email chain dated December 10, 2008, discussing a letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. The participants coordinate comments on the letter and mention that a redacted individual is ready to hand-deliver it.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014128.pdf

An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00014098.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 2008 between attorney Ted Leopold and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The AUSA provides contact details and thanks Leopold for assistance. Leopold replies, copying attorney Spencer Kuvin, stating he will provide 'the names' the following day and asks Kuvin to meet with him.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00014086.pdf

This document is an email chain from June 30, 2008, between Ted Leopold and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) in West Palm Beach regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The correspondence involves the exchange of contact information and includes a personal note from Leopold asking the AUSA to say hello to two mutual friends (names redacted).

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014077.pdf

This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.

Legal filing (government response)
2025-12-25

EFTA00014075.pdf

Email exchange between Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the confidentiality of the September 24, 2007 (Non-Prosecution) agreement. Black thanks the AUSA for agreeing to oppose the disclosure of this agreement in civil cases, fearing it would be publicized to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA requests a copy of the sealed state court filing from co-counsel Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency in documents.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00014062.pdf

This document is a Sealed Document Tracking Form filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 31, 2007. It relates to a motion by the United States to file documents under seal concerning Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY-64 (Case Number FGJ 07-103). The filing requests that the documents remain sealed until case closing and subsequently be returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Sealed document tracking form / legal filing
2025-12-25

EFTA00014044.pdf

This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014035.pdf

An email chain from December 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. They discuss an upcoming meeting involving 'Roy' which Lefkowitz states he will not attend, and arrange a phone call.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00014033.pdf

This document is an email thread from December 2008 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted). The AUSA sends the 'Epstein NonProsecution Agrmt w Addendum.pdf' to Scarola with strict instructions that it only be disclosed to staff who have signed a Protective Order. Scarola responds confirming he will follow the instructions.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00014016.pdf

A confidential letter dated September 18, 2008, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDFL) to the Florida Bar Ethics Counsel seeking a written opinion on the propriety of contacting victims. The letter discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) who pleaded guilty to state sex offenses. The AUSA defends against an accusation by a victim's attorney that notifying victims of the NPA and the availability of independent counsel (Robert Josefsberg) violated Florida Bar rules against solicitation.

Legal correspondence / request for ethics opinion
2025-12-25

EFTA00014011.pdf

This document is a letter from Gail E. Ferguson, Assistant Ethics Counsel for The Florida Bar, to an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) in the Southern District of Florida, dated November 4, 2008. The letter denies a request for an advisory ethics opinion regarding whether the AUSA violated solicitation rules by contacting victims to offer free legal services as required by statute and court order, stating that the Bar cannot opine on past conduct or legal questions. Ferguson discusses relevant rules regarding solicitation (Rule 4-7.4), communication with represented persons (Rule 4-4.2), and compliance with court orders (Rule 4-3.4).

Legal correspondence (ethics opinion denial)
2025-12-25

EFTA00013985.pdf

This document contains an email thread and a subsequent calendar invitation from June 2008 regarding a conference call to discuss 'Epstein'. The emails coordinate availability for a Friday morning call, which was scheduled for June 13, 2008, at 10:00 AM Eastern Time. The participants and specific office locations are heavily redacted.

Email thread / calendar event
2025-12-25

EFTA00013976.pdf

This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.

Legal filing (petition for enforcement of crime victim's rights)
2025-12-25

EFTA00013961.pdf

This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2008, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. The correspondence concerns scheduling a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Epstein. Roy Black indicates he is traveling in California during the exchange.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00013959.pdf

This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). They are attempting to schedule a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Jeffrey Epstein. Roy Black notes he is traveling in California/the mountains with poor cell reception.

Email thread
2025-12-25

EFTA00013951.pdf

An internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated October 16, 2008. The subject is 'Immunity' and it contains attachments related to a response to quash subpoenas and a surreply, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving Epstein's immunity deal.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00013915.pdf

This document is an email chain from June 3, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The correspondence concerns the transmission of a letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein ('Epstein ltr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf'), likely directed to or concerning the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. The participants discuss sending a hard copy of the document 'with fancy tabs' via FedEx.

Email chain
2025-12-25

EFTA00013863.pdf

This document is a short, heavily redacted email dated April 22, 2008, with the subject line 'Epstein'. The sender inquires if the recipient has heard from a specific person and notes that someone (likely the same person or another redacted individual) will be unavailable or away after the 10th for several weeks.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00013841.pdf

An email dated August 14, 2008, sent between redacted parties. The sender sarcastically asks if the recipient has considered nominating a redacted female individual for the 'Timothy Evans Award' for her work on the Epstein case. Timothy Evans was a figure historically associated with wrongful conviction/execution, implying the sender views the handling of the Epstein case as a miscarriage of justice or failure.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00013840.pdf

This document is a high-priority, urgent email (possibly a read receipt based on the 'Read:' prefix) dated July 7, 2008. It was sent by a redacted individual associated with USAFLS (likely the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida). The subject concerns a PDF document regarding the 'Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act' related to Epstein.

Email / read receipt
2025-12-25

EFTA00013839.pdf

This document is an email read receipt dated June 19, 2008. It confirms that an email with the subject 'Epstein Case' was read by a recipient whose identity has been redacted from the 'From' field.

Email read receipt
2025-12-25

EFTA00013811.pdf

This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.

Legal submission / memorandum
2025-12-25
Total Received
$19,463,379.94
39 transactions
Total Paid
$4,983,625.00
16 transactions
Net Flow
$14,479,754.94
55 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid [REDACTED] College/Writer $0.00 Potential payment for college tuition. View
N/A Paid [REDACTED] Writer $0.00 Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received [REDACTED WITNESS] [REDACTED] $0.00 Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein o... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received [REDACTED] [REDACTED] $100.00 Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received [REDACTED] [REDACTED] $0.00 The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. View
N/A Received Implied Ms Maxwel... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... View
N/A Received Epstein [REDACTED] $300.00 Payment for massage services View
N/A Received Epstein's organiz... [REDACTED] $200.00 Christmas gift via Western Union View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex (low end of range). View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $5,000.00 Payment for sex (high end of range). View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $200.00 Cash payments given after massages, initially f... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $200.00 Payment for sex (range start) View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... [REDACTED] $5,000.00 Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... View
N/A Received Baby's father / O... [REDACTED] $300.00 Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... View
N/A Received Mr Epstein or his... [REDACTED] $0.00 Extra payment for sexual encounters. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $0.00 Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein [REDACTED] $300.00 Payment after the massage incident View
As Sender
4807
As Recipient
4978
Total
9785

RE: [Redacted]

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Attached. Thanks. (Includes attachment: 2021.08.24_Court_Subpoena_...)

Email
2021-08-24

Re: [Redacted]

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Yes I think that's appropriate. Could you send that along and we were cut a lead.

Email
2021-08-24

No Subject

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Thanks for the update. We would issue a trial subpoena— let me know if you need one.

Email
2021-08-24

[Redacted] updated flights

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Email transmitting an attachment named THTZUW.pdf related to updated flights.

Email
2021-08-24

Automatic reply: Epstein FOIA Release

From: [REDACTED]
To: Florence Hutner

Automatic out-of-office reply stating the sender is away and checking email periodically. Directs urgent matters to the 'other AUSA assigned to the case'.

Email
2021-08-23

No Subject

From: Detective [Redacted]
To: [REDACTED]

Reported contacting a subject on his home phone who was reluctant to speak. Asked if a subpoena should be issued if he refuses.

Email
2021-08-23

Unknown (part of forwarded thread)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Original message sent at 8:14:00 PM EDT.

Email
2021-08-23

Draft letter to AJN re GM VTCs at MDC

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Sender attaches a draft letter responding to Maxwell's complaints about the MDC regarding VTCs (Video Teleconferences). Mentions a deadline of EOD tomorrow and that MDC legal counsel is also reviewing it.

Email
2021-08-22

Photos for next GM discovery production

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Request to pull photographs from an attached defense submission for the next discovery production, with a specific instruction to exclude a photograph of deposition testimony on page 5.

Email
2021-08-22

No Subject

From: Assistant United State...
To: [REDACTED]

Sending this email as a reminder, as we discussed. Thanks for looking into this.

Email
2021-08-20

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: [REDACTED]
To: Joe Nascimento

Discussing mask mandates in federal buildings and broken water fountains. Recommends Blue Spoon coffee shop.

Email
2021-08-19

Relativity Review - US v. Epstein (SW Returns) - USGME017...

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Contains a link to a document in the Relativity review platform.

Email
2021-08-18

Letter to AJN

From: Andrew (Assistant US A...
To: [REDACTED]

Discussing Judge Nathan's recent order regarding Maxwell's supplemental motions and the disclosure of uncharged co-conspirator identities. The prosecution plans to send a letter stating they do not intend to provide these identities.

Email
2021-08-17

Prince Andrew 'a person of interest' in Epstein probe - s...

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

The email contains a link to a Reuters article about Prince Andrew being a person of interest in the Epstein probe. It includes the footer 'Sent from my iPhone'.

Email
2021-08-17

Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509

From: [REDACTED]
To: Bobbi C. Sternheim

Denial of security breach; explanation that the line was already in use; creating new secure line for 9:30 call.

Email
2021-08-13

Re: SDNY COIVD Screening Forms for next week

From: Danielle Giffuni
To: [REDACTED]

Noting that [Redacted] has not received hotel confirmation.

Email
2021-08-13

Unknown (Reply context)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [REDACTED]

Reporting that third parties accessed the Zoom room during privileged communication with Maxwell; requesting switch to WebEx.

Email
2021-08-12

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] - FW: Voice Message Attached from [REDAC...

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Passing this along per our standard practice. Attachments: [REDACTED]_20210811_120731.wav

Email
2021-08-11

FW: Voice Message Attached from [REDACTED] - name unavail...

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Re Maxwell.

Email
2021-08-11

Voice Message Attached from [REDACTED] - name unavailable

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Time: Aug 11, 2021 12:07:31 PM Click attachment to listen to Voice Message

Voice message notification
2021-08-11

FW: CBP Question

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Forwarding email containing travel record attachments.

Email
2021-08-10

Accepted: Call re: GM photo project

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]

Meeting acceptance notification regarding a call about a 'GM photo project'.

Email
2021-08-10

Unknown (Reply context)

From: Bobbi C. Sternheim
To: [REDACTED]

Initial concern that MDC Zoom platform does not preclude third party interference.

Email
2021-08-09

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Joe Nascimento
To: [REDACTED]

Discussing travel logistics for a meeting on Friday, August 20th. Mentions flying the client up.

Email
2021-08-05

photo review/exhibit project

From: [REDACTED]
To: [Redacted] (NY) (FBI) ...

Initial request for a call to discuss a game plan for the photo review project.

Email
2021-08-03

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity