| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jim Eisenberg
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker 'A'
|
Co conspirators coordinators |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Woman
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Caller/Victim
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Professional correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED]
|
Professional supervisory |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A redacted individual accompanied the interviewee to the encounters 'twice'. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The process of arranging for girls to visit Jeffrey. When Jeffrey was in town, a redacted person ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The interviewee provided massages and was paid $200 each time. The client would sometimes masturb... | An unspecified location ref... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A briefing conversation where a redacted female associate of Epstein's advised the interviewee ab... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with a redacted individual. The interview was held pursuant to a ... | Not specified | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted by the FBI with an individual represented by counsel, pursuant to... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2007-04-24 | N/A | A taped interview was conducted with an individual (name redacted) by the FBI and an Assistant U.... | Undisclosed | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 22 items of property as evidence in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 19 items of property/evidence from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of 24 categories of property/evidence by law enforcement. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
| 2006-08-28 | N/A | Acquisition of property/evidence related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. | 345 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD, PALM... | View |
An email chain from November 24, 2008, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney. Ann Marie Villafana sent a letter to Roy Black, and a subsequent internal email (with redacted participants) asks, 'Wow --- have you heard anything back?', suggesting anticipation regarding Black's response to the attached letter.
An email thread from December 2008 between attorney Katherine Ezell and an Assistant U.S. Attorney concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Ezell inquires whether providing victim addresses to be programmed as 'off-limits' on Epstein's GPS device would inadvertently reveal those locations to him. The AUSA confirms that address information will not be disclosed to Epstein and details that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office (PBSO) monitors his programmed travel routes.
This document is an email thread from July 2008 between attorney Ted Leopold and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The AUSA provides contact details and thanks Leopold for assistance. Leopold replies, copying attorney Spencer Kuvin, stating he will provide 'the names' the following day and asks Kuvin to meet with him.
This document is an email chain from June 30, 2008, between Ted Leopold and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) in West Palm Beach regarding the 'Epstein Investigation.' The correspondence involves the exchange of contact information and includes a personal note from Leopold asking the AUSA to say hello to two mutual friends (names redacted).
This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
Email exchange between Epstein's defense attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the confidentiality of the September 24, 2007 (Non-Prosecution) agreement. Black thanks the AUSA for agreeing to oppose the disclosure of this agreement in civil cases, fearing it would be publicized to attract more plaintiffs. The AUSA requests a copy of the sealed state court filing from co-counsel Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency in documents.
This document is a Sealed Document Tracking Form filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 31, 2007. It relates to a motion by the United States to file documents under seal concerning Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY-64 (Case Number FGJ 07-103). The filing requests that the documents remain sealed until case closing and subsequently be returned to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
An email chain from December 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. They discuss an upcoming meeting involving 'Roy' which Lefkowitz states he will not attend, and arrange a phone call.
This document is an email thread from December 2008 between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted). The AUSA sends the 'Epstein NonProsecution Agrmt w Addendum.pdf' to Scarola with strict instructions that it only be disclosed to staff who have signed a Protective Order. Scarola responds confirming he will follow the instructions.
A confidential letter dated September 18, 2008, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDFL) to the Florida Bar Ethics Counsel seeking a written opinion on the propriety of contacting victims. The letter discusses the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving a defendant (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) who pleaded guilty to state sex offenses. The AUSA defends against an accusation by a victim's attorney that notifying victims of the NPA and the availability of independent counsel (Robert Josefsberg) violated Florida Bar rules against solicitation.
This document is a letter from Gail E. Ferguson, Assistant Ethics Counsel for The Florida Bar, to an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) in the Southern District of Florida, dated November 4, 2008. The letter denies a request for an advisory ethics opinion regarding whether the AUSA violated solicitation rules by contacting victims to offer free legal services as required by statute and court order, stating that the Bar cannot opine on past conduct or legal questions. Ferguson discusses relevant rules regarding solicitation (Rule 4-7.4), communication with represented persons (Rule 4-4.2), and compliance with court orders (Rule 4-3.4).
This document contains an email thread and a subsequent calendar invitation from June 2008 regarding a conference call to discuss 'Epstein'. The emails coordinate availability for a Friday morning call, which was scheduled for June 13, 2008, at 10:00 AM Eastern Time. The participants and specific office locations are heavily redacted.
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2008, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) and Roy Black, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. The correspondence concerns scheduling a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Epstein. Roy Black indicates he is traveling in California during the exchange.
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). They are attempting to schedule a phone call to discuss the 'performance of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement' related to Jeffrey Epstein. Roy Black notes he is traveling in California/the mountains with poor cell reception.
An internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) dated October 16, 2008. The subject is 'Immunity' and it contains attachments related to a response to quash subpoenas and a surreply, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving Epstein's immunity deal.
This document is an email chain from June 3, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The correspondence concerns the transmission of a letter regarding Jeffrey Epstein ('Epstein ltr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf'), likely directed to or concerning the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. The participants discuss sending a hard copy of the document 'with fancy tabs' via FedEx.
This document is a short, heavily redacted email dated April 22, 2008, with the subject line 'Epstein'. The sender inquires if the recipient has heard from a specific person and notes that someone (likely the same person or another redacted individual) will be unavailable or away after the 10th for several weeks.
An email dated August 14, 2008, sent between redacted parties. The sender sarcastically asks if the recipient has considered nominating a redacted female individual for the 'Timothy Evans Award' for her work on the Epstein case. Timothy Evans was a figure historically associated with wrongful conviction/execution, implying the sender views the handling of the Epstein case as a miscarriage of justice or failure.
This document is a high-priority, urgent email (possibly a read receipt based on the 'Read:' prefix) dated July 7, 2008. It was sent by a redacted individual associated with USAFLS (likely the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida). The subject concerns a PDF document regarding the 'Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act' related to Epstein.
This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | College/Writer | $0.00 | Potential payment for college tuition. | View |
| N/A | Paid | [REDACTED] | Writer | $0.00 | Purchase of a travel ticket ('bought me a ticke... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED WITNESS] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Witness stated he would like to reimburse [reda... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein o... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $100.00 | Payment for going with her to Jeff's house and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | The text mentions 'offering [REDACTED]', implyi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein paid for her to [redacted]. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied Ms Maxwel... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex, with the amount depending on w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment for massage services | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein's organiz... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Christmas gift via Western Union | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (low end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (high end of range). | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Cash payments given after massages, initially f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Subject stated they 'was paid well and they bot... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $200.00 | Payment for sex (range start) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | [REDACTED] | $5,000.00 | Payment for sex (range end, depending on travel... | View |
| N/A | Received | Baby's father / O... | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Alleged payment mentioned in school rumors for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Epstein provided [Redacted] to travel to Epstei... | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr Epstein or his... | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Extra payment for sexual encounters. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $0.00 | Received monies for the same thing (amount unsp... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | [REDACTED] | $300.00 | Payment after the massage incident | View |
Subject admitted to theft totaling $209.00 due to financial struggles.
Please call her back in 1h 30 She is on the way to the gym
She is confirming for 5:30 PM. (Caller indicated 'You know the number')
"Just tell him that I called"
THEY ARE AVAILABLE ALL WEEKEND AND [Redacted] MAYBE [Redacted] TOO.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity