European Union
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-02-01 | N/A | Agreement on extradition between the European Union and the United States of America came into force | International | View |
| 2010-02-01 | N/A | Agreement on extradition between the European Union and the USA came into force. | International | View |
| 2004-03-09 | N/A | Law transposing the framework decision on the European arrest warrant. | France | View |
| 2003-06-25 | N/A | Signing of Agreement on Extradition between USA and EU. | Washington | View |
| 2003-06-25 | Treaty signing | Signing of the Agreement on Extradition between the European Union and the USA. | N/A | View |
| 2003-06-25 | Agreement signing | The Agreement on Extradition between the United States of America and the European Union was signed. | N/A | View |
| 2003-06-25 | N/A | Extradition Treaty signed with European Union (Pending) | European Union | View |
| 2002-05-01 | N/A | European Union froze assets of seven Hezbollah-affiliated individuals. | European Union | View |
| 0015-04-01 | N/A | Quartet meeting | Berlin | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002006.jpg
This document is page 34 of a legal filing from December 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details expert opinions from Mr. Perry (UK law) and William Julié (French law), both arguing that Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition to the US from either the UK or France, and would be unlikely to receive bail in the UK if she absconded there. These arguments appear designed to support a request for bail in the US by minimizing her flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00020122.jpg
This document is a legal opinion filed in December 2020 (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal case), authored by French lawyer William Julié. It argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of its nationals to the US, citing the 'Peterson case' and a 2010 EU-US agreement. The document specifically references Ghislaine Maxwell, concluding it is unlikely France would refuse to extradite her, and quotes a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama supporting discretionary extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00020121.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It analyzes the extradition treaty between France and the USA, arguing that France has the discretion to extradite its own citizens. The text specifically rebuts a DOJ argument based on the 2007 'Hans Peterson' case (involving Senators Obama and Durbin), stating that the Peterson outcome was a discretionary ministerial decision rather than a binding judicial precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00020102.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum signed by Philippe Jaeglé of the French Office for the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. It explicitly clarifies that under the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France 'systematically refuses' to extradite its own nationals to the United States, noting this is a principle deviated from only within the European Union. This document is significant in the context of the Epstein case as it outlines the legal barrier that prevented the US from extraditing French associates like Jean-Luc Brunel.
DOJ-OGR-00020081.jpg
This document is page 18 of a government filing (Document 102) from June 18, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues against bail by highlighting flight risks, specifically noting that France does not extradite its own citizens (citing the 'Peterson' case) and arguing that any 'anticipatory waiver' of extradition the defendant might sign regarding the United Kingdom is legally unenforceable under UK law (referencing the Extradition Act of 2003 and U.S. v. Stanton). The prosecution asserts that such waivers are meaningless until a defendant is physically present before a British judge.
DOJ-OGR-00020080.jpg
This page from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) argues that the defendant poses a flight risk because French law strictly prohibits the extradition of French nationals. The prosecution refutes the defense expert's claim that there is no precedent for this by citing the 2006 case of Hans Peterson, a dual US-French citizen who committed murder in the US but could not be extradited from French territory (Guadeloupe) despite US efforts.
DOJ-OGR-00020079.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 100) from the US Government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on June 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses a flight risk because she is a French citizen, and French law strictly prohibits the extradition of its own nationals to the United States. The document references a letter from the French Ministry of Justice confirming this policy and notes that any extradition waiver signed by the defendant would be unenforceable in France.
DOJ-OGR-00020048.jpg
This legal document summarizes expert opinions regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's potential extradition. Mr. Perry, an expert on UK law, concludes that Maxwell is unlikely to successfully resist extradition to the United States or be granted bail. William Julié, an expert on French law, clarifies that, contrary to government representations, the extradition of a French national to the USA is legally permissible.
DOJ-OGR-00002794.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing by attorney William Julié in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 23, 2021. The filing argues against an extradition request by citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It specifically quotes articles that protect nationals from extradition, emphasizing that nationality should be assessed at the time of the alleged offense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019269.jpg
This document is a page from a Freedom House report (Chapter 5) analyzing the rise of 'Illiberal Democracy,' specifically focusing on Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. It details a July 2014 speech where Orbán rejected Western liberal democratic values in favor of 'illiberal' state models like Russia, China, and Turkey, and criticized NGOs as foreign agents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a US congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019247.jpg
This document is page 13 of a Freedom House report (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019247) analyzing modern authoritarian tactics. It discusses methods such as marginalizing opposition, criminalizing protest, and discarding term limits. The text provides specific case studies on political repression in Belarus under Lukashenka and in Ethiopia under the EPRDF, detailing election fraud, arrests of opposition figures, and the geopolitical responses from the US and EU. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page, though the Bates stamp indicates it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031882.jpg
This document page appears to be the conclusion of an article or essay written by Stephen Kinzer regarding Turkish politics. It discusses the necessity for Erdogan to propose a new constitution guaranteeing various freedoms to secure his legacy and aid Turkey's entry into the European Union. While stamped with a House Oversight footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031882), the content of this specific page is a political analysis of Turkey and does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) produced by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529). The text discusses the legal theory of 'Federalism Safeguards on Prosecutorial Discretion,' specifically analyzing how the U.S. system allows federal prosecutors to override or 'second-guess' state prosecutors' decisions not to prosecute (declination decisions), contrasting this with models in Canada, Germany, and Australia. The footnotes discuss historical racial inequities in the U.S. justice system and EU directives on crime victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020568.jpg
This document is page 109 of a House Oversight Committee report (Section 7) discussing the risks of Chinese business practices in the United States. It details the expansion of Chinese banks in the US, noting significant asset growth and specific Federal Reserve enforcement actions against major Chinese banks for money laundering failures between 2015 and 2018. The text also analyzes how China manipulates American companies and executives to influence US policy and conduct technology transfer. While part of a larger cache that may relate to investigations involving Epstein (likely regarding financial oversight or foreign connections), this specific page does not mention Epstein personally.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027004.jpg
A scientific proposal authored by Joscha Bach in February 2013, arguing for a new Artificial Intelligence initiative focused on the 'Computational Structure of Mental Representation.' The document contrasts this proposed approach with the biological brain mapping initiatives proposed by Barack Obama and Henry Markram (Blue Brain project). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer number, indicating it is part of a larger investigative file, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research and academia, although Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027114.jpg
This document analyzes the international pressure placed on Hamas by entities like Washington, the EU, and the UN to join the peace process and recognize Israel. It highlights the ideological difficulties Hamas faces in doing so due to its historical stance and constitution, while noting the economic blockade used as a punitive measure against Palestinians for electing the group.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027105.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a news article or geopolitical analysis focusing on the Obama administration's stalling policy regarding Iran's nuclear program. It discusses the P5+1 negotiations, the specific technical demands regarding uranium enrichment at the Fordow facility, and the differing views between US and European leaders (Cameron and Ashton) regarding sanctions relief. While the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027105' suggests this document is part of a congressional investigation (potentially related to materials found in possession of Epstein or his associates), the text itself is strictly a geopolitical briefing without direct mention of Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027104.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a media monitoring report or briefing book, stamped with a House Oversight footer. It contains the conclusion of one opinion piece and the beginning of another titled 'Let's face it: Obama's Iran policy is failing' by James Traub, dated February 8, 2013. The text focuses on US foreign policy regarding Iran, discussing sanctions, the nomination of Chuck Hagel, and diplomatic interactions involving Joe Biden and Benjamin Netanyahu.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018100.jpg
A Los Angeles Times article by Timothy Garton Ash dated June 16, 2011, discussing the multifaceted crisis facing the European Union, including debt issues in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain, as well as immigration tensions in Italy and France. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018100', indicating it was included in evidence files provided to the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a collection of news clippings relevant to geopolitical or financial monitoring.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018085.jpg
This document is a 'Presidential Press Bulletin' titled 'The Shimon Post' dated June 17, 2011, likely prepared for Shimon Peres. It lists six news articles from various international publications (The Guardian, NYT, etc.) covering topics such as the Arab Spring, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and potential war with Iran. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation discovery cache.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011482.jpg
This document appears to be page 11 of a draft manuscript or book, likely written by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak (inferred from the reference to 'my night flight back from Camp David nearly 15 years ago'). The text analyzes geopolitical threats to Israel, including the 'Arab Spring,' a nuclear Iran, and strained relations with the US and Europe. It also critiques Benjamin Netanyahu's political strategy of using fear to win elections. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of evidence collected during a US congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein inquiry given the known association between Barak and Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023470.jpg
This document appears to be page 13 of a larger report or intelligence briefing (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) detailing the Syrian Civil War. It focuses on internal fractures within the Syrian military, specifically the execution of soldiers who refused to fire on protesters, and the deployment of irregular Alawite militias ('ghosts') to terrorize the opposition. While part of a production likely related to government oversight, the text itself is a geopolitical analysis of the Assad regime's tactics and the opposition's status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023167.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book proof (published by Oxford University Press in 2014) detailing the history of the Middle East peace process between 2001 and 2003. It describes the failure of the Taba talks, President Bush's 2002 call for Palestinian leadership change, the isolation of Yasser Arafat, and the formation of the 'Middle East Quartet' (UN, US, Russia, EU) initiated by Kofi Annan. It details the creation of the 'Road Map' for peace by US officials William Burns and David Satterfield. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely in an investigation related to the individuals mentioned or the diplomatic processes involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029060.jpg
This document is a transcript page (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029060) recording a conversation between Bannon and Harnwell. They discuss the relationship between European political parties (specifically Marine Le Pen and UKIP) and Vladimir Putin. Bannon analyzes Putin's ideology as rooted in 'Eurasianism' and traditionalism, arguing that there is a global reaction against centralized governments in favor of nationalism and local sovereignty.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity