| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1
|
Co petitioners |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Victim subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1
|
Co petitioners co victims |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Rape of Jane Doe 2 | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing/Filing | Court (Southern District of... | View |
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Filing of Jane Doe 1 and 2's Reply to Intervenor Epstein's Brief. | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Filing by Jane Doe 1 and 2 in the Florida CVRA case. | Florida | View |
| 2019-07-23 | N/A | Filing by Jane Doe 1 and 2 in Florida CVRA case regarding remedies. | Florida | View |
| 2019-07-21 | N/A | Approximate date for filing the brief mentioned (email states 'We file in about one week' from Ju... | Court (implied) | View |
| 2019-05-23 | Legal filing | Doe, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 submitted a document on proposed remedies. | N/A | View |
| 2019-05-10 | N/A | Filing of Petitioners' Position on Procedures to Determine Remedy. | SD Florida Court | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | Summary Judgment Order entered by Judge Marra finding the Government violated the CVRA. | SD Florida Court | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Clients were told the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Petitioners initiated the action. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-08-07 | N/A | Jane Doe 1 provided information about her abuse and Jane Doe 2's abuse to the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Ja... | Palm Beach, Florida; United... | View |
This document is a printed webpage from the Palm Beach Daily News dated April 7, 2011, reporting on a motion filed by attorneys representing victims (Doe 1 and 2) to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The motion argues the agreement is illegal because the government failed to notify victims as required by the Crime Victim Rights Act, allegedly to protect Epstein due to his political connections. The article includes comments from U.S. Attorney's Office spokesperson Alicia Valle denying CVRA violations because no federal charges were filed.
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript of Paul G. Cassell, questioned by Mr. Simpson. They discuss a 'motion for joinder' filed in a previous 'CVRA action' on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4. The document confirms that Cassell and attorney Bradley J. Edwards were co-signatories on this motion.
Jane Doe 2 received the same CVRA letter as Jane Doe 1.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity