This document consists of four handwritten message slips from April 2005. The messages record communications for individuals including 'Mr. J. Epstein', 'Jeffrey', and 'GM'. Callers include Melissa Hanes, 'Mr. Madelson', and 'Philip', with most messages being requests for a return phone call.
This document contains a scan of four phone message slips from a spiral-bound notebook, dated April 2005. Messages are directed to 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and Jeffrey Epstein. Callers include 'Philip', 'Melissa Hanes', and 'Mr. Madelson' (possibly a misspelling of Mandelson), who left a contact number and room number (Room 467).
This is a page from a Palm Beach Police Department incident report dated February 17, 2006. It details a statement from a redacted victim who describes being brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house by 'Robson'. The victim describes meeting Epstein and a blond female assistant, being led to a massage room, and being pressured into disrobing and performing a massage while Epstein masturbated. The victim notes that Epstein paid her $300 and that Robson admitted to knowing what would happen.
This legal document, a court filing from 2021-07-02, discusses the admissibility of 'prior bad acts' evidence in a case involving Cosby and Constad. The Superior Court affirmed that evidence of Cosby's 'unique sexual assault playbook' was admissible to demonstrate a common plan, despite dissimilarities in the nature and location of the alleged assaults and the temporal gap between them. The court emphasized that the pattern of behavior, rather than absolute identicality of incidents, determines admissibility under Rule 404(b).
This document is page 2 of a court filing from June 16, 2021, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the conditions of the defendant's confinement at the MDC, specifically highlighting her access to attorney communications (25 hours of VTC per week and weekend in-person visits) and the security measures in place, including soundless camera monitoring and mandatory searches (pat-downs, mouth checks, and strip searches).
This document is an email dated October 2, 2019, from a redacted sender to Charisma Edge, James Petrucci, and Shirley V. Skipper-Scott. The email schedules a follow-up meeting for October 16, 2019, to review the 'Psychological Reconstruction' of inmate Epstein (#76318-054). The meeting is scheduled to be held in the Warden's conference room.
This document is an email sent on September 19, 2019, by Charisma Edge and others to several recipients including Petrucci, Shirley V. Skipper-Scott, and James. The email announces a meeting scheduled for 12:30 that day in the Warden's conference room to discuss the 'Psychological Reconstruction' of inmate Epstein, identified by number #76318-054.
This document is page 24 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing against a renewed bail application for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). It details her evasion of law enforcement, noting that despite communications between her counsel and the government from July 2019 to March 2020, her location was never disclosed. It further highlights that upon arrest, she ignored FBI directives and fled from agents who were clearly identified, countering defense claims that she was simply following security protocols.
This document is a transcript page from an interview between an investigator (MP) and a redacted witness. The witness describes a sexual encounter where a male subject (implied to be Epstein) paid her $300 while wearing a towel. The interview covers the possibility of hidden cameras in the room and concludes with the witness admitting that an associate named Haley instructed her to lie and claim she was 18 years old.
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted on July 26, 2017. An interviewer, identified as 'MP', questions a witness about an incident where an unnamed male allegedly masturbated while she was giving him a massage. The witness confirms she saw the man 'whacking off' and provides details about his position on the table at the time.
This document is a transcript of an interview dated July 26, 2017, where an interviewer, 'MP', questions an individual about a massage they administered. The interviewee describes the male client making strange, groaning noises, which MP suggests could be 'sex noises', and recounts how the client asked them to 'please massage my boobs'. The speaker repeatedly expresses how embarrassing the incident was to recall.
This document is a page from a transcript (Page 22 of 43) of an interview between an individual identified as 'MP' and a redacted witness. The witness recounts a disturbing interaction with a male subject who ordered her to take off her pants and exposed himself on a table. The witness provides physical descriptions of the subject, specifically noting that he was 'disgusting' and had a very hairy chest and back.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC East Building. The text details unsanitary conditions involving mold and vermin, inadequate facilities for legal counsel meetings (described as a 'fishbowl' and 'death trap'), and Maxwell's deteriorating health due to lack of fresh air and sunlight over eight months. It also notes that a request for a legal call regarding pretrial motions was denied.
This document is page 2 of a legal filing from April 6, 2021, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the conditions of the defendant's confinement at the MDC, specifically highlighting that she is separated from her isolation cell from 7am to 8pm daily with access to electronics and showers. The text extensively describes the protocols for attorney-client communications, noting she receives 25 hours of private VTC calls per week, and clarifies that surveillance cameras monitor the door but do not record the audio or visual content of these legal meetings.
This document consists of two phone message slips for a person named Jeffrey, both dated April 11, 2005. The first message is from Alicia at Omnipoint Communications, and the second is from a Mr. Maddison. Both callers requested that Jeffrey call them back.
This document is a handwritten note containing a list of seemingly unrelated items, including references to rooms in a house ('living room', 'Pink Room'), maintenance notes ('Roll down by bathroom shutter', 'temp. control'), and mentions of individuals. Notably, it references 'Abigail Ohio house' and 'Eva's little girl on the boat'. The page is dated 07/26/17 and includes a document control number from a public records request.
A document containing pages 60 and 61 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped with a House Oversight Committee footer. The text features a transcript of an interview between investigator Recarey and a recruiter named Dobbs. Dobbs details how she recruited a girl referred to as '[Mary]' for Jeffrey Epstein, explicitly stating that she warned the girl about Epstein's sexual expectations ('fondling') and the incentive-based payment structure ('the more you do, the more you make').
A Palm Beach Police incident report detailing a January 2006 interview with a witness who, at age 17 (in 2005), was recruited by a former roommate to meet Jeffrey Epstein. The report describes an incident where Epstein provided money for the girls to buy lingerie at Victoria's Secret, after which he pressured the minor witness to model the underwear for him at his home, with the roommate encouraging compliance. The witness also noted that Epstein was paying her roommate's bills and they were allegedly dating.
This document is a continuation of an incident report from the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Case No. 1-05-000368, involving Jeffrey Epstein. It details witness statements about recruiting underage girls for massages at Epstein's house, payments exchanged, and police interviews with involved parties, including a visit to a potential underage witness's home. The report notes that a witness compared herself to "Heidi Fliess" and that police used a tape recorder during a transport.
A page from a manuscript (likely Sarah Ransome's) detailing complex romantic interactions with two men referred to as 'Mr. Ambition' and 'Richard'. The narrator describes a painful conversation with Mr. Ambition about intelligence and dating, followed by a sexual encounter with Richard the next evening, during which Richard advocates for the narrator to reconcile with Mr. Ambition. The text reflects on the confusing nature of these relationships, describing the dynamic with Mr. Ambition as 'confidently ambiguous'.
This document is a biographical profile page, likely from a program or briefing book, stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017563'. It features detailed biographies of biologist Edward Wilson and dancer/arts director Damian Woetzel. The text outlines their respective careers, awards, and institutional affiliations (such as Harvard for Wilson and the Aspen Institute/White House for Woetzel) up to approximately July 2012.
This document is a detailed schedule for a 'WWW' conference occurring from Tuesday, September 18 to Thursday, September 20 (likely 2012). The event took place at the Mission Inn Hotel in Riverside, CA, and the Esri campus in Redlands, CA. The schedule lists numerous high-profile speakers from science, technology, and entertainment, including Yo-Yo Ma, will.i.am, Stephen Wolfram, Frank Gehry, and Jeffrey Katzenberg. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with or attendance at high-level intellectual gatherings.
In this deposition transcript, a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein) admits to Ms. Haddad that he operated a Ponzi scheme involving the sale of fake legal settlements. He testifies that while 90% of the settlements were completely fictitious, he utilized an actual ongoing case involving Jeffrey Epstein to 'bolster the visual' for sophisticated investors to convince them the settlements were real. He describes creating fake documents and introducing investors to lawyers working on the real Epstein file to add legitimacy to his fraud.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz (dated 4.2.12 in header). In it, he discusses the ethical complications and public backlash he faced for representing Mike Tyson in his rape appeal. He quotes several angry letters he received and describes how Harvard Law School students protested his involvement, with some threatening to file sexual harassment charges against him for creating a 'hostile environment'.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal review (likely authored by Alan Dershowitz given the style and context of House Oversight documents) analyzing the Mike Tyson rape trial. The text harshly criticizes the Indiana judicial system and Judge Gifford for alleged bias, unethical media lobbying, and procedural errors. It also details and questions the account of the accuser, Desiree Washington, highlighting her behavior leading up to the event to cast doubt on her testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity