| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney Edwards
|
Professional opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Meg Garvin
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña received a copy of Epstein's proposed state plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2008-06-27 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña received copy of Epstein's proposed plea agreement and called Attorney Edwards. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-19 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña sends ultimatum email to Jay Lefkowitz regarding plea negotiations vs indictment. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-19 | N/A | AUSA Villafaña sends deadline email to Jay Lefkowitz regarding plea negotiations. | N/A | View |
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
This page from a House Oversight report details the timeline between June 27 and July 11, 2008, regarding the violation of victims' rights (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to inform victims' attorney Edwards that Epstein's state plea would preclude federal prosecution. Consequently, victims E.W. and L.M. only discovered the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008, after Edwards had filed a federal action to enforce their rights.
This document (page 12 of a House Oversight report) details evidence collected by the Palm Beach Police Department, specifically message pads showing Epstein's staff scheduled girls ages 12-16 daily. It describes the U.S. Attorney's Office's preparation of federal charges, including an 82-page prosecution memo and a 53-page indictment. The text includes a direct quote from a September 19, 2007 email from AUSA Villafaña to Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, demanding a conclusion to plea negotiations by the following Monday.
This document outlines the timeline surrounding the violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case during June and July 2008. It details how AUSA Villafaña withheld critical information from victims' attorney Brad Edwards regarding the finality of the plea agreement and its impact on federal prosecution. Consequently, Edwards filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida to enforce the rights of victims E.W. and L.M., who only learned the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008.
This document page details the evidence collected by the Palm Beach Police Department, specifically message pads indicating the daily scheduling of girls aged 12-16. It outlines the U.S. Attorney's Office's preparation of federal charges, including an 82-page prosecution memo and a 53-page indictment. The text includes a specific email from AUSA Villafaña to Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz, issuing a deadline for plea negotiations to avoid indictment.
This document page outlines the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in 2005 regarding the abuse of minors. It specifically details allegations of witness tampering, citing a 2007 incident where Epstein instructed his personal assistant, Leslie Groff, not to cooperate with FBI agents serving a subpoena at her home. The document also briefly mentions Donald Trump and Bill Clinton in the context of phone listings in an evidentiary journal.
Written explanation of some terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Urging vigorous enforcement of federal laws and indictment of Epstein.
Villafaña notified Edwards of the Monday hearing but failed to disclose that the state plea would end the possibility of federal prosecution.
Villafaña notified Edwards about a hearing but omitted that the state guilty plea would end federal prosecution possibilities.
Edwards informed Villafaña of his representation of Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Villafaña mentioned possible indictment but withheld info on plea deal.
Jay - I hate to have to be firm about this, but we need to wrap this up by Monday. I will not miss my indictment date when this has dragged on for several weeks already...
Warning that negotiations must wrap up by Monday or indictment will proceed; mentions 82-page prosecution memo and 53-page indictment sitting on shelf since May.
Attached proposed plea agreement describing Epstein's witness tampering.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity