DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
506 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
506 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues that 'Juror No. 50' gave false answers during jury selection, which prevented the Court from properly assessing his impartiality and potential biases. The filing asserts that truthful answers would have led to the juror's removal. It also notes that the juror has continued to engage in 'media exploits,' including appearing in a documentary on January 18, 2022, despite being represented by counsel in this matter.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
The central figure of this document, accused of giving false answers during jury selection and participating in media...
|
| counsel | Legal Counsel |
Mentioned as representing Juror No. 50 in footnote 16.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Juror No. 50 provided false answers to questions, which deprived the Court of a basis for inquiry into his ability to serve impartially.
Court
Relationships (2)
The document describes the juror's duty to provide truthful answers to the Court during jury selection, a duty which was allegedly breached.
Footnote 16 states that Juror No. 50 is 'represented by counsel'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Juror No. 50’s false answers to both questions deprived the Court of any basis for any meaningful inquiry on a topic bearing directly on his ability to serve impartially and the basis for a cause challenge."Source
— Author of the legal document
(Summarizing the core argument that the juror's dishonesty undermined the jury selection process.)
DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
Quote #1
"Truthful answers from Juror No. 50 would have led the Court and the parties to probe much more deeply into his biases and prejudices, both known and unknown."Source
— Author of the legal document
(Explaining the consequence of the juror's alleged false answers.)
DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror No. 50 continues his media exploits despite being the subject of this Motion and represented by counsel."Source
— Author of the legal document
(Footnote 16, highlighting the juror's continued public activities, including a documentary appearance.)
DOJ-OGR-00009053.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (962 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 52 of 66
basis for a cause challenge or a peremptory challenge. Juror No. 50’s false answers to both questions deprived the Court of any basis for any meaningful inquiry on a topic bearing directly on his ability to serve impartially and the basis for a cause challenge.
Truthful answers from Juror No. 50 would have led the Court and the parties to probe much more deeply into his biases and prejudices, both known and unknown.17 Had that happened, the record shows that he would have been removed as a potential juror.
16 Juror No. 50 continues his media exploits despite being the subject of this Motion and represented by counsel. On January 18, 2022, he appeared in a documentary produced by ITV. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvnwRuDfrdM at timestamps 01:53, 02:32, 04:10, 05:10, 34:36, 38:41, 39:15.
17 This follow-up questioning would not have been a mere formality.
45
DOJ-OGR-00009053
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document