Chris Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court hearing for appearances of counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-11-25 | N/A | Conference call between US Attorney's Office and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding MDC c... | Teleconference | View |
EFTA00032004.pdf
This document contains notes from a conference call on November 25, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Sternheim and Everdell). The discussion focuses on Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically complaints regarding excessive surveillance (cameras, sleep checks every 15 minutes), invasive strip searches, and isolation compared to General Population inmates. Defense counsel explicitly links the extreme surveillance measures to the government's fear of a repeat of the Jeffrey Epstein suicide incident.
EFTA00024562.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6, 2020, between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and U.S. Pretrial Services. The correspondence concerns arranging a pretrial interview for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell with her attorneys, Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen, in preparation for her bail hearing later that week. Pretrial Services confirms they will handle the request.
EFTA00024543.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, originating from a US Marshals Service directive regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC. The directive outlines strict monitoring protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and the deployment of SRT personnel. Subsequent emails in the chain discuss and approve the addition of Maxwell's New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen of Cohen & Gresser LLP, to her approved contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
EFTA00014916.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, between government officials (likely DOJ and US Marshals) regarding the custody conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC shortly after her arrest. It outlines specific security protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and video monitoring, while also coordinating the approval for her to communicate with her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen.
EFTA00014910.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2020 regarding the custody protocols for Ghislaine Maxwell at the Merrimack Department of Corrections in New Hampshire. A Supervisory Deputy US Marshal outlines strict monitoring procedures, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and the stationing of SRT personnel. A subsequent email requests the addition of attorneys Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen to Maxwell's approved phone list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
EFTA00010370.pdf
This document contains an email chain between US Marshals Service officials regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in July 2020. The emails outline strict security protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a prohibition on staff conversation, and the deployment of SRT personnel. Additionally, there is a request to add attorneys Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen to her approved phone contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
EFTA00010367.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes specific directives from the US Marshals Service to Merrimack DOC regarding her housing in unit M1, 15-minute observation watches, prohibition of staff conversation, and video surveillance protocols. Additionally, the emails discuss a request to add her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her permitted contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
EFTA00010364.pdf
This document contains an email chain and a specific directive from the US Marshals Service regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in July 2020. The directive outlines strict monitoring protocols, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, isolation in unit M1, and video recording requirements. The email chain discusses the logistical necessity of adding her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her permitted call list, which initially only included Lawrence Vogelman.
EFTA00010362.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 2-3, 2020, regarding the custody of Ghislaine Maxwell at Merrimack DOC in New Hampshire. It details strict monitoring protocols issued by the US Marshals Service, including 15-minute observation watches, a ban on staff conversation, and specific video surveillance procedures. Additionally, the emails discuss a request to add her New York attorneys, Chris Everdell and Mark Cohen, to her approved telephone contact list alongside Lawrence Vogelman.
DOJ-OGR-00001883.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 10, 2020. It records a dialogue between defense attorney Mr. Cohen, the Judge ('The Court'), and the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The discussion concerns Maxwell waiving her right to be physically present for the proceeding and agreeing to proceed via videoconference, with the judge confirming the waiver is knowing and voluntary.
DOJ-OGR-00001006.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, for a hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan. The transcript records the appearances of the legal counsel for both the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the U.S. government. The government's counsel also requests permission for staff from the U.S. Attorney's office to be dialed into the hearing due to technical issues with an overflow line from Connecticut.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity