This document is an email metadata log dated December 17, 2020, regarding a 'Question re SDFL Epstein file'. It shows correspondence involving representatives from the US Attorney's Offices in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) and the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The specific content of the email is not visible, only the headers and an indication of an embedded message file.
This document is an email thread from November 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). Lefkowitz arranges a meeting, noting he will be seeing Jeffrey Epstein during his trip to update him on civil cases, but expresses a desire for his meeting with the AUSA to be primarily social. The AUSA confirms availability and mentions an upcoming email to Lefkowitz and 'Roy' regarding two issues related to Mr. Epstein.
This document is an email chain from September 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Counsel (likely for the Florida Bar). The AUSA is requesting a written staff opinion regarding 'Final Victim Notification,' attaching sample notification documents. Tarbert acknowledges the request and notes a 3-5 week turnaround time for a reply.
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys (USAFLS) and attorney Roy Black. The AUSA initially contacted Black to discuss the 'Epstein matter,' to which Black replied he was out of town and asked for details. The AUSA then forwarded this exchange internally, suggesting the discussion relates to the 'performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement'.
Discusses Brad Edwards' letter, the lack of federal charges, and the request for facts on why victims weren't consulted. States the reason was a belief that the Crime Victims Rights Act did not apply, rather than confidentiality provisions.
Confirms 'Everything is out.' Requests colleague to e-file a notice of appearance so both receive hearing notices.
Discusses preparation of a motion to seal for afternoon filing. Notes that Epstein's name was not included and general assertions were made regarding confidentiality of negotiations. Instructions given for signing and packaging sealed documents.
Clarification question: 'You want to seal my declaration as well, right?'
Confirmation: 'Yes, both the response, your declaration, and the attachments to your declaration, are to be sealed.'
No luck yet getting in touch with [redacted] mother.
Strange, huh? Did you get to go away? Have a great weekend.
Hi guys – Have we ever heard of [Redacted] (below)?
Providing names of two clients (names redacted).
Discussing filing the agreement and flagging Epstein's misstatements regarding the Florida Science Foundation's age, location, and his work attendance.
Providing contact information and thanking for assistance.
Confirming details of a telephone conference on June 27 regarding the Epstein plea agreement's compliance with the September 2007 non-prosecution agreement.
Sender forwards a faxed letter and updates recipients that police checked the docket. A status conference is set for 8:30 and a 'procurement of minors charge' appears to have been filed.
Sender thinks they have designed a solution to the '2255 issue' and will call to discuss the plea after finishing search warrants.
Let's talk about going to the COP (Change of Plea)
Stating the Government's position that there is a signed, binding agreement with no need for modification. Requests date/time for change of plea and sentencing.
Sorry. I am at birthday lunch now. I will call as soon as I can. Overall it went well. There is a new development. I will call soon
How did the conf call go! Sorry couldn't wait longer!
How did the conf call go! Sorry couldn't wait longer!
Sender informs recipient that Epstein's publicist, Howard Rubenstein, is also the publicist for The New York Post, suggesting a connection regarding an article quoting Lefcourt.
Attachment: 2DAG060208.wpd
Please tell me you that you are joking. Maybe we should throw him a party and tell him we are sorry to have bothered him.
Don't know what is up but Barry talked to [Redacted] and according to [Redacted] said something about 90 days in jail...
Hi [Redacted], [Redacted], and [Redacted]. Have you heard anything? Thank you.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity