This document is an email metadata log dated December 17, 2020, regarding a 'Question re SDFL Epstein file'. It shows correspondence involving representatives from the US Attorney's Offices in the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS) and the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The specific content of the email is not visible, only the headers and an indication of an embedded message file.
This document is an email thread from November 2008 between attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). Lefkowitz arranges a meeting, noting he will be seeing Jeffrey Epstein during his trip to update him on civil cases, but expresses a desire for his meeting with the AUSA to be primarily social. The AUSA confirms availability and mentions an upcoming email to Lefkowitz and 'Roy' regarding two issues related to Mr. Epstein.
This document is an email chain from September 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Ethics Counsel (likely for the Florida Bar). The AUSA is requesting a written staff opinion regarding 'Final Victim Notification,' attaching sample notification documents. Tarbert acknowledges the request and notes a 3-5 week turnaround time for a reply.
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2008, involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys (USAFLS) and attorney Roy Black. The AUSA initially contacted Black to discuss the 'Epstein matter,' to which Black replied he was out of town and asked for details. The AUSA then forwarded this exchange internally, suggesting the discussion relates to the 'performance of the Non-Prosecution Agreement'.
Requesting recipient's cell phone number to set up a USAfx account to share a folder of documents.
Subject: Epstein documents; Embedded: Epstein_documents.msg
Email metadata containing an embedded message regarding questions about the SDFL Epstein file.
Confirming availability for Thursday and Friday.
Detailed update on court hearings, motions by Palm Beach Post, and arguments that Epstein is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement.
Clarification regarding GPS exclusionary zones for victims. Confirms Epstein will not receive victim addresses/names.
Confirming a meeting on Friday and stating 'Nothing re Epstein' regarding the immediate email content.
I will be out of the office on Monday Dec. 22 and return Monday Jan 3.
Notification of annual leave from December 19-30, 2008.
Confirming a draft supplemental declaration is fine and asking for it to be signed and scanned for filing on Monday.
Discussing a lawyer filing the non-prosecution agreement under seal, asking about a motion for summary judgment, and confirming notifications about work release were sent to victims' attorneys.
Remember (not that you would forget) the grand jury expires the end of Jan.
Thanks. I'll be there in 15 minutes and I'll fill you in on what [Redacted] found out.
Request to convert attachment to PDF and send to Hotmail. Note about Judge continuing hearing. Personal note 'I luv u'.
Discussion regarding drafting a response to a Florida Bar Complaint, mentioning emergencies, court attendance, and an extension obtained.
Asking if the visit is social or business; mentions sending an email to Jay and Roy regarding Epstein.
Confirming a trip to see Jeffrey and proposing a social visit with the AUSA.
Asking about availability on Monday or Tuesday before Thanksgiving.
Sender is sharing a draft letter ('Ltr to Lefkowitz and Black') and asking for changes before sending.
Clarification question: 'Which order?'
Confirmation of requests. Mention of seeing an Order: 'I saw the Order (OMG). Sorry!'
Request to watch for faxes from 'Epstein friends' and scan them. Request to reserve the big conference room for Monday morning.
Reaction to the order: 'Aaah, yes. I knew that it was coming, so I wasn't that surprised.'
Clarification: 'The one about the turning over the agreement...'
Acosta states that contacting victims was believed to compromise them as witnesses. He notes Epstein argued victims were motivated by money and the office did not want to discuss liability with them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity