U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-01-01 | Legal decision-making process | The thought process and decision-making regarding the prosecution of the Epstein case, weighing a... | Southern District of Florida | View |
EFTA00035394.pdf
This document is an Institution Supplement (NYM 7331.04e) for the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York, dated November 13, 2014. It outlines detailed policies and procedures for the management, housing, screening, and rights of pretrial inmates held at the facility. The document covers intake procedures, medical screening, housing assignments, visiting rules, legal resources, and disciplinary protocols.
EFTA00019757.pdf
This document is an email chain between officials at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) on the morning of August 10, 2019, detailing the timeline of notifications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's death. The chain begins with a 7:52 AM notification of an 'apparent suicide attempt' and ambulance transfer, followed by an 8:18 AM confirmation that he had 'passed.' A significant portion involves a USAO official expressing extreme frustration at 10:43 AM that defense counsel and the press had more information than the government attorneys, specifically requesting basic facts like time and cause of death.
DOJ-OGR-00023232.tif
This document outlines victim/witness notification practices by the USAO and FBI during the Epstein investigation, focusing on the application of the 2005 Guidelines. It details the responsibilities of U.S. Attorneys to notify crime victims of case events and decisions, and describes training efforts led by U.S. Attorney Acosta to ensure compliance with these guidelines.
DOJ-OGR-00021239.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a report (likely by the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility) reviewing the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. It details Alexander Acosta's justification for the non-prosecution agreement, citing the difficulty of federal trafficking prosecutions at the time (2006-2007) and a preference for state resolution. The document also discusses the legal strategy regarding Rule 11(c) binding pleas and the interaction between federal and state prosecutors, noting the State Attorney's Office desire for 'political cover'.
DOJ-OGR-00021204.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a DOJ report (likely the OPR report) detailing the structure of Florida law enforcement and the background of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. It outlines the roles of the Palm Beach State Attorney and Sheriff's Office, Acosta's professional history, and his direct involvement in negotiating Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent state plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00023077.jpg
This document details prosecutor Acosta's explanation to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) for pursuing a state-level, pre-indictment resolution in the Epstein case. Acosta cited the novelty of trafficking prosecutions at the time, issues with witnesses and evidence, and the belief that a state resolution offered more flexibility than a federal one. The document also includes statements from other legal professionals, Menchel and Villafaña, who described the general aversion of federal judges in the Southern District of Florida to binding plea agreements like Rule 11(c) pleas.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity