| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-20 | Legal filing | A LETTER RESPONSE was filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in opposition to ... | N/A | View |
This document is a docket report from the SDNY case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from October 18-21, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a telephone conference. Notably, media organizations and reporters filed letters opposing 'secret jury selection' and the sealing of juror questionnaires.
This document is a docket sheet page from October 2021 regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a pretrial conference held via telephone on October 21, 2021, attended by the defendant and legal teams. Significant entries include Judge Nathan's order (Doc 364) establishing jury selection protocols, denying a defense request to seal questionnaires, and addressing media opposition to secret proceedings filed by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
This document is a court docket from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from October 20-22, 2021. It records efforts by media organizations, including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to oppose the sealing of jury selection materials, ensuring public access. The central entry is a detailed order by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying the request to seal the materials and outlining the specific procedures and a comprehensive schedule for the upcoming jury selection process, including questionnaires, voir dire, and deadlines for counsel.
This document details the conflict between police (represented by Recarey and Chief Reiter) and the prosecutor (Krischer) regarding the handling of the initial 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how police sought serious charges, but the prosecutor referred the case to a grand jury that only heard from two witnesses, resulting in a minor indictment. Chief Reiter subsequently publicly opposed Krischer, referred the case to the FBI in July 2006, and faced social backlash in Palm Beach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity