HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443.jpg
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
House oversight committee record / narrative report
File Size:
Summary
This document details the conflict between police (represented by Recarey and Chief Reiter) and the prosecutor (Krischer) regarding the handling of the initial 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how police sought serious charges, but the prosecutor referred the case to a grand jury that only heard from two witnesses, resulting in a minor indictment. Chief Reiter subsequently publicly opposed Krischer, referred the case to the FBI in July 2006, and faced social backlash in Palm Beach.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Recarey | Law Enforcement/Detective |
Drew up probable cause affidavits charging Epstein; noted Krischer's unusual handling of the case.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Accused |
Charged with sex-related crimes; indicted on minor solicitation charge.
|
| Krischer | Prosecutor/State Attorney |
Referred case to grand jury instead of filing charges directly; stated he didn't believe accusers.
|
| Reiter | Police Chief |
Took public stance against Krischer; referred case to FBI; blackballed in Palm Beach circles.
|
| Epstein's assistants | Suspects |
Two assistants mentioned in probable cause affidavits.
|
| One recruiter | Suspect |
Mentioned in probable cause affidavits.
|
| Epstein's civil attorneys | Legal Defense |
Aggressively questioned victims in civil lawsuits.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Opened investigation in July 2006 after referral from Reiter.
|
|
| State Grand Jury |
Investigated the case; only called two accusers.
|
|
| State Court |
Where Epstein was indicted on minor charges.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (indicated by footer).
|
Timeline (5 events)
2008
Start of approximately two dozen civil lawsuits filed by victims.
Court
Victims
Epstein
Attorneys
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Reiter was blackballed; implied location of the crimes/investigation.
|
Relationships (2)
Key Quotes (1)
"There are challenges here that don’t exist in a lot of other places because of the affluence in the community, but the only way I could approach this case was that none of that matters. The truth is still the truth. The facts are the facts. Everybody is treated the same."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,036 characters)
In May 2006, Recarey drew up probable cause affidavits, charging Epstein, two of his assistants and one recruiter with sex-related crimes. Instead, Krischer took what Recarey said was the unusual step of referring the case to a state grand jury. Epstein was indicted in state court on a minor charge of solicitation of prostitution.
Recarey said Krischer told him he didn’t believe Epstein’s accusers, and only two of them were called before the state grand jury investigating the case — even though police had lined up more than a dozen girls and witnesses at that time.
Believing that the case had been tainted, Reiter — that same month, May 2006 — took a very public stance against Krischer, writing a letter, which was released to the news media, calling on Krischer to remove himself from the case. The chief then referred it to the FBI, which opened its own investigation in July 2006, FBI records show.
Reiter said he was effectively blackballed in some Palm Beach circles as a result of going over Krischer’s head, and their relationship, once strong, would never be the same.
Reiter has no regrets about what he did.
“There are challenges here that don’t exist in a lot of other places because of the affluence in the community, but the only way I could approach this case was that none of that matters. The truth is still the truth. The facts are the facts. Everybody is treated the same.”
In the years that followed, several of the victims obtained lawyers and filed civil lawsuits against Epstein. About two dozen lawsuits were filed, starting in 2008. The early cases were particularly brutal for his victims, the court records show. The girls faced fierce grilling from another pack of Epstein’s civil attorneys, who questioned them about their boyfriends, drinking, drug use, social media posts, their parents and even their medical histories.
One girl was asked about her abortions, and her parents, who were Catholic and knew nothing about the abortions, were also deposed and questioned.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document