Haddon Morgan
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defense attorney
|
Employment collegial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00021064.pdf
This document is an email chain from February 5, 2020, involving attorney Sigrid McCawley. McCawley highlights a filing by the Epstein Estate in the US Virgin Islands, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers (Haddon Morgan) submitted a $621,000 bill to the estate. McCawley points out that this contradicts Maxwell's previous testimony claiming Epstein did not pay for her litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00001921.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 10, 2020. The defense attorney argues to the judge that the defendant, her associates, and the legal team at Haddon Morgan have received death threats and physical threats. The attorney contends these safety concerns are preventing individuals from coming forward to support a bail package and criticizes the government for dismissing the severity of these threats.
DOJ-OGR-00001058.jpg
This document is page 117 of a court transcript from Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues before the Court that his legal team (including Haddon Morgan) had informed the government they were available for the voluntary surrender of their client, Ms. Maxwell, should an indictment occur. Cohen expresses frustration that the government arrested Maxwell without contacting them first and criticizes the government's reply brief for attempting to 'throw dirt' on his client.
DOJ-OGR-00001057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney, Mr. Cohen, argues that his client has remained in the U.S. and that counsel has been in frequent contact with the government, suggesting a voluntary surrender could have been arranged. The judge interrupts to seek explicit clarification on whether the defense actually offered to arrange a surrender in the event of an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is addressing a judge. The attorney argues that their client, people close to the client, and even the law firm (Haddon Morgan) have received serious physical and death threats, which they present as a significant factor for the court's consideration. The attorney contrasts the reality of these threats with the government's alleged attempts to downplay them.
DOJ-OGR-00001931.jpg
This document is page 54 of a court transcript filed on December 10, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues that the defense had previously urged the government not to indict and had made it clear they were available for voluntary surrender, yet the government arrested Maxwell without prior contact. Cohen notes that the government was fully aware that his firm and Haddon Morgan represented Maxwell, and he criticizes the prosecution for trying to 'throw some more dirt' on his client in a reply brief.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity