Relationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020620.jpg
This document appears to be page 161 of a larger report (marked Appendix 2) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details Chinese influence operations in Germany, specifically noting espionage attempts via LinkedIn (revealed in 2017) and the cultivation of business elites to bypass Chancellor Angela Merkel's critical stance on human rights. It discusses the geopolitical impact of the '16-1 group' in Central Europe and identifies former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt and Philipp Roessler as specific targets of Chinese cultivation efforts. While part of a dataset possibly associated with Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell investigations (given the House Oversight stamp common in such releases), the text itself is strictly a geopolitical analysis of German-Chinese relations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017080.jpg
This document is a page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists approximately 46 individuals, including their job titles, organizations, and countries of origin. The list includes high-profile figures such as Reid Hoffman (LinkedIn), Arianna Huffington (Huffington Post), and various international business executives. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017080), indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017597.jpg
This document contains an email correspondence sent to a reporter at the St. Augustine Record. The writer makes conspiratorial allegations linking a woman named Ms. Simms and the Horton family to a 2007 murder, child exploitation, and terror financing. The email also discusses legal proceedings involving FDLE agent Rusty Rogers and diverges into theories about 9/11, the DHS, and the National Science Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584.jpg
This document is a biographical list of high-profile individuals from the technology, political, and academic sectors, possibly serving as a guest list for a conference or retreat (such as the Dialog Retreat mentioned in Auren Hoffman's bio). It includes the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017584', indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. Notably, the list includes a 'Jeff Epstein,' who is identified as the former CFO of Oracle, distinct from the financier Jeffrey Epstein typically associated with such investigations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027203.jpg
This document is a digital message log from March 2017, produced during a House Oversight investigation. It captures conversations involving an email address associated with Jeffrey Epstein (jeeitunes@gmail.com) discussing a potential meeting between 'Bg' (likely Bill Gates) and Donald Trump, which the sender dismisses as a 'waste of time,' suggesting a meeting with 'Barrack' instead. Other messages identify Jonah Goldman as a senior political adviser to 'Bg' and include a recommendation for a female friend described as 'smart no drama,' followed by a query about being in NYC.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032059.jpg
This document is a page containing the footer of a LinkedIn InMail notification and a confidentiality disclaimer. The email was sent in or after 2016 to a redacted recipient described as a 'Corporate Pilot in SoCal' qualified on 'Gulfstream GIV' aircraft. The disclaimer identifies the content as the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.jpg
This document is an email thread from October 13, 2016, originating from a LinkedIn message sent by CNN reporter Melanie Hicken to one of Jeffrey Epstein's pilots (name redacted). Hicken requests an off-the-record discussion regarding allegations that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump visited Epstein's private island and engaged in sexual relations with minors. The pilot forwarded this inquiry to Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwarded it to his associates Kathy Ruemmler and Darren Indyke.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013803.jpg
This document is a page from a book preface (likely 'The 4-Hour Workweek' updated edition) written by Tim Ferriss, dated April 21, 2009, in San Francisco. The text discusses 'lifestyle design,' economic downturns, and alternatives to traditional retirement, citing successful companies born during recessions. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013803,' indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation, though the text content itself is generic business advice and does not explicitly mention Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029550.jpg
This document is a printout of Internet search results for 'Jeffrey Epstein' and related terms, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. The results include news articles from Forbes (debating his billionaire status) and the NY Post (regarding his post-jail return to NYC in 2011), as well as links to his foundation and unrelated individuals with similar names (a venture partner and a doctor). The snippet text highlights his connections to high-profile figures like Leslie Wexner, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029546.jpg
This document is a House Oversight Committee record containing an email from Tyler Shears to an associate named Christina and Jeffrey Epstein, dated February 7, 2014. The email discusses an aggressive reputation management strategy to 'clean up' and 'dislodge' negative search engine results about Epstein, specifically referencing a list of attached search results that include a 2011 New York Post article about his sex offender status. Shears emphasizes the urgency of publishing a 'fresh piece' (positive placement) by the following week to meet a previously discussed timeline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029336.jpg
An email from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein dated March 25, 2013, with the subject 'google search'. Kahn reports that he performed a search (referred to as 'jee google') and believes the results look 'very good'. The body of the email lists eight Google search results, including links to Wikipedia, NY Mag, NY Post, and Epstein's own foundation websites, with snippets mentioning his connections to high-profile figures like Leslie Wexner, Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton, as well as references to his sex offender status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025889.jpg
This document discusses the approval, benefits, and high cost of a new cholesterol-lowering drug called Praluent, noting its potential expense concerns raised by CVS Caremark executive Troy Brennan. It details the FDA's approval criteria, focusing on patients with genetic conditions or previous heart disease, and mentions the pricing strategy by Regeneron and Sanofi amidst competition from Amgen. The bottom half of the page lists "Recommended by Forbes" article links.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.jpg
An email thread from July 16, 2014, regarding online reputation management for Jeffrey Epstein. Tyler Shears explains to Epstein that search results have worsened due to recent negative press involving 'Clinton' (an ex-president), despite previous progress reducing negative results to just one (Forbes). Christina Galbraith discusses technical SEO measures like social media updates and Google Analytics tracking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026364.jpg
This article discusses the new cholesterol drug, Praluent, from Regeneron and Sanofi, focusing on its high price, which is 46% higher than analyst forecasts. It details the FDA's approval for a broader patient group than expected, the potential for wide prescription by doctors despite the label, and the expected resistance from insurance companies who will likely restrict its use. The article also includes commentary from executives at Regeneron and Sanofi, as well as analysts and cardiologists, on the drug's market potential and place alongside existing treatments like statins.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026363.jpg
This document is a printout of an article, likely from Forbes circa 2015, discussing a new cholesterol drug, Praluent. The article details the drug's effectiveness, its high cost ($14,600/year), and the companies involved, such as Regeneron, Sanofi, and Amgen. Although the document has a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates number, its content does not contain any explicit mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals, and its relevance to that case is not apparent from the text itself.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity