This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal battle of the Tison brothers (Ricky and Raymond) against the death penalty in Arizona. It details the Supreme Court's decision to vacate their death sentences based on a new 'reckless disregard' standard, the subsequent reimposition of the sentence by a trial judge, and the eventual reversal by the Arizona Supreme Court to allow for new evidence. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation, likely related to Dershowitz's involvement in the Epstein case.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the 'Tison v. Arizona' case discussed) describing Supreme Court oral arguments. The text details the legal debate regarding the 'felony murder' rule, specifically whether the brothers (Ricky and Raymond) had the specific intent to kill the Lyons family or were merely present. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the Congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely included to illustrate the author's legal philosophy or history.
This document appears to be a page from a legal memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, who argued *Tison v. Arizona*) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details the narrator's oral arguments before the Supreme Court on November 3, 1986, defending the Tison brothers against the death penalty by arguing they lacked specific intent to kill. The text recounts interactions with Justice White and mentions a challenge from Justice Scalia.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity