CNN
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00021166.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email dated September 9, 2020, containing a digest of press clippings relevant to the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The clips cover various topics including legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein documents in the US Virgin Islands, as well as news items concerning Robert Hadden, William Barr, and other political figures. The email was prepared by Nicholas Biase of the SDNY Public Affairs office.
EFTA00020535.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ/USANYS email circulating a Daily Beast article titled 'Manhattan D.A. Cy Vance Finally Got Harvey Weinstein, but He’s Still Letting Women Down.' The article critically examines Vance's history of leniency toward powerful men accused of sex crimes, specifically detailing the plea deal given to Dr. Robert Hadden and the failure to prosecute Harvey Weinstein in 2015. Crucially, it mentions that the same assistant DA who handled the Hadden case had also attempted to downgrade Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender status in 2011.
EFTA00019240.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) Public Affairs division, dated August 16, 2019. It warns colleagues that CNN is investigating a story regarding two individuals who visited the SDNY office in 2015 or 2016 to complain about Jeffrey Epstein's Florida plea deal. The email notes that the complaint was allegedly made to a sex/human trafficking AUSA but was not escalated to senior leadership at the time.
EFTA00018706.pdf
This document is an email dated July 12, 2019, sent from an iPhone. The sender shares a link to a CNN article titled 'Jeffrey Epstein allegedly hired private investigators to stalk his victims'. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00018398.pdf
An email from July 9, 2019, sent by a Public Affairs officer at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY), circulating a CNBC article. The article details Attorney General Bill Barr's decision not to recuse himself from the 2019 federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, distinguishing this from his recusal regarding the internal review of the earlier non-prosecution deal overseen by Alex Acosta, due to Barr's past employment with Kirkland & Ellis.
EFTA00018224.pdf
This document is a chronology of events occurring at the MCC between July 2019 and January 2020, focusing on Jeffrey Epstein (JE) and his cellmate Nicholas Tartaglione (NT). It details the July 23 incident where Epstein was found unresponsive, the subsequent discovery of a 'note' by Tartaglione in a book, and the legal team's handling of that evidence leading up to and following Epstein's death on August 10. The timeline tracks the chain of custody for the note, internal disagreements among counsel regarding its authenticity, and media interactions by attorney Bruce Barket (BB).
EFTA00015207.pdf
This document is an email thread dated October 13, 2020, forwarding a daily press clipping report from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The report lists various news articles, highlighting a section specifically for 'MAXWELL' which includes links to stories about Ghislaine Maxwell's legal case, photos, and Jeffrey Epstein's financial activities and associations (including Leon Black). The email sender flags these articles for the recipient's interest.
EFTA00014714.pdf
This document contains an email chain between USANYS officials dated November 23, 2021. It discusses a surge in FOIA requests (from ABC, CNN, MuckRack) to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) following a Times article about Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration and death. The emails focus on BOP's attempt to contact Mark Epstein regarding previous communications, with US attorneys sharing contact details for Mark and his lawyer, Stacey Richman.
EFTA00014263.pdf
This document is a compilation of SDNY news clips from March 9, 2020. Key topics include U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman's statement that Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the Epstein investigation, the massive indictment of 27 individuals (including trainers Jorge Navarro and Jason Servis) in a horse racing doping scandal, and the mistrial in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak case. It also covers the transfer of MCC staff following Epstein's suicide, the sex trafficking case of Lawrence Ray, and tensions between SDNY Attorney Berman and Attorney General William Barr regarding DOJ independence.
EFTA00014243.pdf
This document is a compilation of 'SDNY News Clips' from March 9, 2020, summarizing major legal news relevant to the Southern District of New York. Key stories include Prince Andrew's refusal to cooperate in the Epstein investigation, the transfer of the MCC jail captain following Epstein's suicide, a massive horse racing doping indictment involving high-profile trainers, the hung jury in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak trial, and internal DOJ conflicts between U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman and Attorney General William Barr. It also touches on Harvey Weinstein's injury in jail and new court restrictions due to the emerging Coronavirus outbreak. No flight logs were present in the document.
EFTA00011046.pdf
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated January 25, 2021, distributing daily news clippings. The email, sent by Spokesman Nicholas Biase, includes a list of hyperlinks to articles from various media outlets covering topics such as the Capitol riot, Donald Trump, and significantly, an article about how Ghislaine Maxwell was located by the FBI via her phone. The recipient list is redacted.
EFTA00009977.pdf
A chain of emails between the FBI New York Field Office and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) from late 2018. The officials discuss recent reporting by the Miami Herald and CNN regarding Jeffrey Epstein's previous non-prosecution deal and sealed indictment. They coordinate a conference call to discuss gathered information on the 'Jeff Epstein matter' and plan a subsequent meeting with case agents to determine next steps.
DOJ-OGR-00015140.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, outlines the Department of Justice and FBI's position that no further disclosure regarding the Epstein investigation is warranted. It references a July 2025 memo which supported the official conclusion of Epstein's suicide on August 10, 2019, and notes the subsequent public and congressional dissatisfaction, citing various news articles from July 2025 that reported on the controversy and calls for greater transparency.
DOJ-OGR-00020932.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire from a legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 indicates they have not formed an opinion about Ms. Maxwell that would impede impartiality, but they have heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN, specifically regarding his death and that he was in jail awaiting trial. The juror denies ever publicly stating or posting opinions about either individual.
DOJ-OGR-00022082.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a motion from a defendant named Thomas. The Government contends it is not required to produce documents from separate investigations conducted by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or other federal agencies into the death of Jeffrey Epstein, because those agencies are not part of the prosecution team and the materials are not in the prosecution's possession.
DOJ-OGR-00022031.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 9, 2020, is a motion seeking to compel the government to produce discovery related to the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The motion argues that multiple federal agencies, including the DOJ, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service, have conducted investigations, and the defense is entitled to reports and documents from these inquiries. The document cites various news reports and a previous court order from November 2019 to support its claim that the government has failed to meet its disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019572.jpg
This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues for the continued sealing of certain court documents, with redactions, to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial from pretrial publicity. The filing references the government's own public statements about its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's associates as evidence of the high-profile nature of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009127.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. It details the jury selection process (voir dire) occurring in November 2021, specifically focusing on 'Juror 50.' The text highlights Juror 50's questionnaire responses, where he disclosed reading on CNN that the defendant was Epstein's girlfriend but affirmed his ability to remain fair, impartial, and decide the case based solely on evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00009111.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 614) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues that modern jurors in high-profile trials are incentivized to lie during voir dire to gain fame and profit, contrasting this with historical adherence to oaths. It cites interviews with jurors from the Derek Chauvin and Harvey Weinstein trials as evidence of jurors seeking media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00009102.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case, filed on February 24, 2022, detailing the questioning of a potential juror. The court probes the juror's prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, which the juror states came from a CNN news broadcast after Epstein's death. The juror affirms their ability to disregard this information and judge the case solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00009086.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for Juror 50, filed on February 24, 2022, for a case involving Ms. Maxwell. The juror states they have not formed any opinions about Ms. Maxwell that would prevent them from being impartial. The juror confirms they have previously heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN, specifically recalling news of his death and that he was in jail awaiting trial.
DOJ-OGR-00010330.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated April 1, 2022, detailing the jury selection process for 'Juror 50'. It outlines that Juror 50 completed a questionnaire on November 4, 2021, answering 'No' to questions 25, 48, and 49 regarding prior knowledge or conflicts, and subsequently underwent in-person voir dire on November 16, 2021. During questioning, Juror 50 admitted to seeing a CNN article about the Defendant and Jeffrey Epstein but affirmed he could decide the case impartially based solely on evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00009793.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a judge questioning a potential juror for a case involving Ms. Maxwell. The juror states their only prior knowledge of Ms. Maxwell came from a CNN news report about Jeffrey Epstein's death, which mentioned he had a girlfriend. The juror affirms their ability to disregard this prior information and judge the case solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00009777.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire from a case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on March 24, 2022. Juror 50 states they have not formed any opinions about Ms. Maxwell that would prevent them from being impartial. The juror confirms they had previously heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN, specifically recalling reports of his death and that he was in jail awaiting trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009679.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 states they have not formed an opinion about Ms. Maxwell that would impede impartiality, but they have heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN. Specifically, the juror recalls hearing about Epstein's death and that he was in jail awaiting trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity