This document is a page from a court transcript (Direct Examination of witness Aznaran) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony explains technical details regarding how passenger entry data is recorded, distinguishing between static data provided by airline manifests (names, DOB, carrier codes) and dynamic processing times updated in the TECS system when a passenger is physically processed by a CBP officer at an immigration kiosk.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her past use of Xanax, alcohol, and alleged cocaine use between 2000 and 2005. The witness admits to Xanax use for anxiety at age 13 and alcohol use in 2005, but denies the document's claim regarding the frequency of alcohol use starting in 2000 and adamantly denies using cocaine or crack in 2002-2003.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Document 636) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated March 1, 2022, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It contains a transcript of questions posed to an individual (likely a juror) regarding their attention to detail when filling out a specific questionnaire, specifically referencing Questions 34, 37, and 41. The questioning focuses on establishing that the individual did not 'fly through' the questions but took time to provide written responses.
This document is page 97 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about whether she has text messaged FBI agents or federal prosecutors, or if they have shared information with her regarding what 'other girls' have said; she denies both. She also discusses her parents' knowledge of how to contact the FBI, noting that her mother 'doesn't care to know any of this stuff' and mentioning an individual named Paul associated with her mother.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely conducted by the House Oversight Committee. A witness, who is a legal counsel affiliated with the University of Utah College of Law, is being questioned about why a specific footnote—clarifying that their use of the university address did not imply institutional endorsement—was included in one exhibit (Exhibit 1) but omitted from a previous pleading (Exhibit 2). The witness confirms they vouched for the document completely.
Page 10 of a deposition transcript marked 'ROUGH DRAFT ONLY' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an interviewer questioning a witness about the ethical responsibilities of an attorney when signing pleadings filed in Federal Court, specifically the Southern District of Florida. The witness defines the obligation as ensuring a good-faith pleading based on facts and law while zealously representing the client.
This document is page 5 of a deposition transcript where an anonymous witness describes their limited interaction with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states they met Epstein once and visited his house once, after being told by a redacted female acquaintance that she and others were arranging for girls to give Epstein massages. The witness was assured that the arrangement was for "strictly massages" with "no physical contact."
Maxwell received notes from Jane's interview, which recorded the abuse she suffered in New Mexico, over three weeks before her trial.
Maxwell received notes from Jane's interview, which recorded the abuse she suffered in New Mexico, over three weeks before the trial.
Graphic description of LBJ's actions towards JFK's corpse.
Transcript of this interview is the subject of the filing
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity