Page 10 of a deposition transcript marked 'ROUGH DRAFT ONLY' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an interviewer questioning a witness about the ethical responsibilities of an attorney when signing pleadings filed in Federal Court, specifically the Southern District of Florida. The witness defines the obligation as ensuring a good-faith pleading based on facts and law while zealously representing the client.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Interviewer (Q) | Interviewer |
Conducting the questioning regarding legal ethics and pleadings.
|
| Unknown Witness (A) | Witness/Deponent |
Answering questions regarding attorney ethical responsibilities; answers suggest the witness is likely an attorney.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Court |
Jurisdiction mentioned regarding filing pleadings.
|
|
| Southern District of Florida |
Specific court jurisdiction mentioned in the questioning.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Legal jurisdiction mentioned.
|
"The obligation is to make sure that it is a good-faith pleading based on the facts and the law as the attorney understands them, and consistently with the obligation of the attorney to zealously represent the position of his client."Source
"What is your understanding of the ethical responsibility of an attorney in signing a pleading to be filed in Federal Court"Source
"Would you agree with me that it would be unethical to use pleadings for an improper purpose"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document