| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Woody Allen
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Andre Previn
|
Former spouses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Friedman
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
@WolfyJam
|
Criticism |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Woody
|
Couple former |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional good terms |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Frank Sinatra
|
Former spouses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Professional advisory |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Custody trial ruling | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woody Allen-Mia Farrow cases | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator and wife drive to Connecticut to meet Mia Farrow regarding abuse allegations. | Connecticut | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woody and Mia attend a talk by the narrator about the Rosenberg trial. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woody Allen vs. Mia Farrow Custody Trial | Courtroom | View |
| 1992-01-01 | N/A | Woody Allen took photographs of Soon-Yi Previn which were discovered by Mia Farrow. | Allen's apartment | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Woody Allen vs. Mia Farrow custody lawsuit. | Unknown | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (page 288), likely written by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the cases mentioned, produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text reflects on the author's experience with high-profile cases, specifically referencing the Woody Allen/Mia Farrow conflict and the Clinton-Lewinsky impeachment. It outlines seven specific rules for lawyers handling celebrity clients, emphasizing the importance of maintaining professional distance, managing media expectations, and delivering hard truths to clients.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context) produced for the House Oversight Committee. It recounts the narrator's involvement in the Woody Allen vs. Mia Farrow custody battle, highlighting phone calls from Frank Sinatra and a meeting with Andre Previn, both of whom were Mia Farrow's ex-husbands and expressed a desire to physically confront or intimidate Woody Allen in her defense. The text includes a header date of April 2, 2012, suggesting a draft date.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (possibly by Alan Dershowitz) containing a transcript of court testimony regarding the Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute. Dershowitz testifies that he was not trying to be Allen's criminal lawyer but that Farrow had asked him to intervene, and he expresses his belief that Allen received terrible legal advice which escalated the situation. The text includes Dershowitz's commentary on the testimony, noting that the court would not allow him to expand on a perceived 'hidden agenda' during the proceedings.
This document appears to be a page (285) from a manuscript (likely Alan Dershowitz's memoir, given the context) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details the legal battle between Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, specifically focusing on the narrator's conflict with Allen's lawyer, Robert Morvillo. The narrator alleges Morvillo accused him of blackmail out of revenge for the narrator previously ruining Morvillo's chance to become a US Attorney by exposing prosecutorial misconduct.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or legal narrative (likely by Alan Dershowitz, author of *Chutzpah*) describing his involvement in the 1992 conflict between Mia Farrow and Woody Allen. It quotes a harsh appellate court opinion regarding Allen's photography of Soon-Yi Previn and details the narrator's attempts to mediate a private resolution between Farrow and Allen to avoid public scandal. The document includes text of a letter sent to Allen warning him of the destruction of his career.
The author recounts interactions with Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, starting with discussions on film and politics, specifically the Rosenberg trial. The narrative shifts dramatically when Mia Farrow calls the author to allege that Woody Allen is abusing her children, leading the author and his wife to visit Farrow's home in Connecticut where they learn details of allegations involving Soon-Yi and Dylan.
This document appears to be a page (p. 282) from a manuscript or memoir draft, dated April 2, 2012. The author (likely Alan Dershowitz, based on the context of House Oversight documents and the persona of a criminal lawyer) recounts a personal anecdote about meeting filmmaker Woody Allen for lunch during the filming of 'Manhattan.' The text discusses the media-heavy nature of the Allen vs. Farrow custody battle and details a philosophical conversation between the author and Allen about defending Jesus in court and the implications for Christianity.
This document is a printout of an online comment section, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (025038). It features comments from a user named '@WolfyJam' expressing hostility toward celebrity Mia Farrow, recounting racially charged personal anecdotes from the 1970s in Philadelphia, and making anti-Islamic statements regarding the state of the country. While the prompt identifies this as Epstein-related, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their known associates in the visible text of this specific page.
This document is a printout of a website comment section (likely FrontPage Magazine, indicated by 'FPM') bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It contains two visible comments: one discussing Mia Farrow and a racially charged personal anecdote from the 1970s in Philadelphia, and another by user 'WolfyJam' discussing 'the Control factor' and expressing anti-Islamic views. The document appears to be part of a larger discovery or investigation file, though no direct link to Jeffrey Epstein is visible in the text of this specific page.
This document appears to be a printed page of internet comments from a larger House Oversight Committee file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024416). The comments discuss various topics including religious/political ideologies, the decline of Western civilization, and gun control, with specific criticism directed at celebrity Mia Farrow. One commenter shares a racially charged anecdote about growing up in Philadelphia in the 1970s.
This document is a capture of a website comments section (possibly from a news site) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024404. It contains four user comments discussing religion, a book recommendation, the fall of civilization, and a racially charged rant criticizing celebrity Mia Farrow and describing personal altercations in 1970s Philadelphia. The document does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the visible text.
This document is a printout of a website comment section (likely from FrontPage Magazine/FPM) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024393). It contains two comments from a user named '@WolfyJam' which express strong, controversial views regarding celebrities (specifically Mia Farrow), race relations, gun rights, and Islam. The document does not contain direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or specific financial/flight data usually associated with the case, suggesting it may be collateral evidence or background material included in a larger production.
Asked narrator to tell Woody to stop; mentioned Woody admired him and had his book.
Mia informs the narrator that Woody is abusing her children.
Farrow asked Dershowitz if he would speak to Woody Allen.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity