| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was submitted as evidence, labeled 'Government Exhibit 237', in the criminal case... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as Government Exhibit 903-R in the court case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | This document is Exhibit 932 for the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A photograph was entered into evidence as 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT 51-C' for the case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated Government Exhibit 224-R, in the criminal cas... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence (Exhibit 904-R) in the criminal case S2 20 Cr. 330. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | This photograph was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 211, in the legal case ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A notebook was entered as evidence, designated as Government Exhibit 601 in case 52 20 Cr. 330 (A... | N/A | View |
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
An email dated August 22, 2021, discussing a draft letter to Judge 'AJN' (likely Alison J. Nathan) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints about VTC (Video Teleconference) access at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The sender notes a deadline of the following day and mentions coordinating with MDC legal counsel for review.
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
This document is a digital calendar log entry for an event titled 'Accepted: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)' scheduled for November 21, 2021. The event attendee is Allison Stoddart. The location and Stoddart's email address are redacted.
This document is an email notification dated November 20, 2021, sent to Allison Stoddart. The subject line indicates an acceptance of a calendar invite or meeting related to the court case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The sender's identity is redacted.
A formal letter dated November 20, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams (SDNY) to the Legal Department of the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. The letter provides the password for a drive containing discovery materials, witness materials, and government exhibits related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email dated October 7, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The email transmits an attached PDF titled '2020.07.15,_GM,_20_Cr._330_(AJN),_Scheduling_Order.pdf', which references case number 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) and Judge Alison J. Nathan (AJN).
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It commands the Sacramento County Clerk/Recorder to appear in court on November 29, 2021, and to produce a birth certificate for a specific individual whose name has been redacted.
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) to the US Government prosecutors complaining about the government's failure to provide readable discovery materials at the MDC. The letter highlights that the government holds approximately 40,000 non-nude and thousands of nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The defense requests a fully readable laptop for Maxwell and immediate access to the seized images, noting that COVID-19 restrictions complicate the review process.
This document is an email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The email, dated September 14, 2021, serves as a cover for an attached discovery letter concerning 'victim disclosures'.
This document is a court subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Dated July 13, 2021, it commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify.
This is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) issued on October 5, 2021, to The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. It demands the production of employment records regarding a redacted individual for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance/production date is set for November 29, 2021.
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form submitted on November 11, 2021, by an Assistant US Attorney to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted witness to attend trial preparation and the trial itself in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The form includes administrative details and standard instructions for domestic witness travel expenses.
This document is a digital calendar record for an event titled 'Accepted: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. The event was a Zoom meeting scheduled for November 22, 2021, attended by Allison Stoddart, likely related to legal proceedings (Case 20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email notification dated November 19, 2021, indicating the acceptance of a calendar invite or meeting regarding the court case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The email is addressed to Allison Stoddart, with the sender's information redacted.
This document is an email header dated November 19, 2021, indicating an acceptance (likely of a calendar invitation) related to the court case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The email is sent to Allison Stoddart at WilmerHale from a redacted sender.
An email dated November 9, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of an ECF filing ('Reply_to_Dkt_423.pdf') related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) and to update recipients on Sternheim's new office address, which is redacted in the document.
An email dated November 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the U.S. v. Maxwell case (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (referenced as 'fling') related to an attachment titled 'Suggestion_to_Dkt_404.pdf' and provides notice of Sternheim's new office address. Recipients include co-counsel Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
This document is a letter dated November 18, 2020, from Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to the Legal Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the provision of a specifically modified laptop to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center to allow her to review discovery materials for her case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The letter certifies that the laptop's recording (mic/camera) and communication (Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Ethernet) capabilities have been disabled.
This document is a photograph, labeled as Government Exhibit 317 for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein sitting together and smiling. The image was likely used as evidence in legal proceedings to establish their close relationship. The document is also marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00015640.
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 306 in the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows an unidentified woman with short dark hair relaxing on the back of a yacht in a sunny, coastal location. The document is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00015632.
This document is a government exhibit containing an architectural drawing dated March 23, 1994, for the 'Epstein Residence' located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida. The plan, created by architect Roger Wm. Sahli with associated architect Michael J. Johnson, details the exterior paving and cabana area, including a swimming pool. The drawing includes several handwritten annotations indicating modifications such as removing and replacing tiles and removing planting pots.
This document is a photograph presented as Government Exhibit 293 in a legal case, identified as S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows a downward view of a carpeted staircase inside a residence. The document is also marked with a Department of Justice identifier, DOJ-OGR-00015622.
This document is a photograph labeled 'Government Exhibit 291' from the legal case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)'. The image, identified as DOJ-OGR-00015620, depicts an interior view of a residence, showing a wooden door opening into a hallway, and serves as evidence in a government legal proceeding.
This is a photograph of a desk entered as Government Exhibit 285-R in case S2 20 Cr. 330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The desk features personal items including a notepad printed with 'Ghislaine Maxwell', a landline telephone, a silver-framed photo of a couple, a wicker basket, and a model airplane with the tail number N908GM. One picture frame in the background has been redacted.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity