EFTA00015277.pdf
136 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
136 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Stan Pottinger | Lawyer |
Described as a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a civil action.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the suppression hearing and legal motions discussed.
|
| MJ Netburn | Magistrate Judge |
US Attorneys requested her decision (Exhibit I).
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
US Attorneys discussed seeing original application to him.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Said she would resolve suppression motions at a later time ahead of trial.
|
| McMahon | Judge (implied) |
Transcript of proceedings and her opinion mentioned.
|
| AJN | Judge (likely Alison J. Nathan) |
Referenced in subject line 'AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing'.
|
| [Redacted] | Chief, Public Corruption Unit |
Sender of the initial email requesting a meeting.
|
| [Redacted] | Associate U.S. Attorney |
Participant in the email chain.
|
Organizations (3)
Timeline (2 events)
2021-06-15
Email discussion regarding upcoming AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Southern District of New York (Email)
USANYS Attorneys
Upcoming (relative to 2021)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller
represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action
Key Quotes (4)
"Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #1
"She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court’s page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #2
"Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions 'at a later time' ahead of trial."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #3
"We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing... related to [REDACTED] that we'd like your thoughts on."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,363 characters)
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:54:46 +0000
Attachments: Ex._H_Sealed.pdf
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:54:46 +0000
Attachments: Ex._H_Sealed.pdf
Here it is – Ex H.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 3:45 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 3:45 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
And can you send me MJ Netburn's decision? Exhibit I to the def motion, I think
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:58 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action.
The two letters we submitted in connection with our All Writs Application are attached.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 11:53 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Another Q: who's Stan Pottinger?
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:53 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2021 10:40 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Can I see our original application to Judge Sweet? And I assume there was no transcript before Judge S?
EFTA00015277
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:45 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
In the spirit of completeness, I'm also attaching their replies.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 5:20 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Goodness!
[REDACTED]
Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Associate U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
On Jun 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court's page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:25 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Dumb Q: why does Maxwell have two memos of law?
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 2:19 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
[REDACTED],
Per our discussion, I am attaching: (1) Maxwell's two briefs raising the suppression argument; (2) the transcript of the McMahon proceedings and her opinion (Ex D, E, G); (3) our brief (see pp 59-115); and (4) the exhibits we attached to our motion (Ex 4-7). Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions "at a later time" ahead of trial. Thanks very much.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 10:09 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
EFTA00015278
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Subject: RE: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sure, set a time other than 2:00. I'm in the office. Or Webex
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 9:11 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Question re AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Hi [REDACTED],
We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing (no date set yet, although we expect one) related to [REDACTED] that we'd like your thoughts on. Let us know a convenient time to stop by over the next few days, thanks.
[REDACTED]
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
EFTA00015279
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document