undersigned counsel
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal action | The government sought the unsealing of grand jury materials without first conferring with the vic... | this Court | View |
| 2019-07-11 | Legal filing | A motion was filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein requesting to file his supplemental financial dis... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2015-01-02 | N/A | Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 For Joinder in Action filed by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000325.jpg
This is a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motion requests the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal, arguing that the intense publicity of the case would lead to its wide dissemination in the media. The filing cites the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)) as legal grounds, stating that such information is intended to be confidential and used only for bail determination.
DOJ-OGR-00019566.jpg
A heavily redacted legal filing from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The document discusses procedural history, including government applications in 2019, Maxwell's arrest in July 2020, and allegations in the superseding indictment regarding perjury and assisting Jeffrey Epstein. A footnote details the timeline of discovery materials received by the defense in early August 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00031543.jpg
This is a legal filing (Response to Motion for Protective Order) from the 2006 criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Epstein's defense denies allegations of harassment regarding the service of a subpoena to witness Jane Doe No. 1 and denies knowledge of an agent visiting her workplace. The document highlights a legal dispute between attorneys Theodore Leopold and Jeffrey Herman, both of whom claim to represent Jane Doe No. 1 in a separate civil proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00010737.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on June 26, 2022, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim identified as 'Jane Doe' (who testified under the pseudonym 'Kate') is requesting permission to deliver an oral victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing scheduled for June 28. The motion cites 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to support the inclusion of victim statements.
Identification of clients referenced in grand jury materials
The counsel for the victims requested that the government identify which of their clients were referenced to the grand jury. The government responded promptly with clarification, but the counsel believes other clients were referenced but not identified.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity