Event Details
January 02, 2015
Description
Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 For Joinder in Action filed by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| undersigned counsel | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Doe | person | 125 | View Entity |
| JANE DOE #4 | person | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00021553.pdf
This document is a corrected motion for joinder in a legal case, filed on January 2, 2015, by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, seeking to join an existing lawsuit against the United States. The motion details allegations of sexual abuse and sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell against Jane Doe #3, including forced sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz, and argues that the new victims' circumstances are relevant to the court's assessment of their joinder.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Alleged sexual encounter or inappropriate contact
Date unknown • Little Saint James Island
Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3
Date unknown • Unknown
The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), addressed the knowledge requirement for a lawyer to report a belief that an opposing witness had lied.
1988-01-01 • Connecticut
The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the Indictment in the criminal case was filed.
Date unknown
A motion was filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein requesting to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal.
2019-07-11 • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to intervene and stay proceedings.
Date unknown
Connecticut disciplinary hearing for 'Doe'
Date unknown • Connecticut
The government sought the unsealing of grand jury materials without first conferring with the victims or their counsel.
Date unknown • this Court
The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which a lawyer was disciplined for not reporting a belief that an opposing witness lied in a deposition.
1988-01-01 • Connecticut
Filing of Jane Doe No. 3 public affidavit in the CVRA case.
2015-01-21 • Court (CVRA case)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event