B.Y.U.L. Rev.
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on closed-circuit transmission of trials for victims and the right to be heard at sentencing for petty offenses. The text argues that the CVRA necessitates changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to ensure victim participation. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely used as an exhibit or reference in legal proceedings or congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (likely regarding CVRA violations).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017762.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 48 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It outlines proposed changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 48 and 50, arguing that courts must consider victims' views before dismissing charges and ensure proceedings are free from unreasonable delay. The document bears the name David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or testimony during a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017757.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and 'Proposed Rule 43.1(b)' regarding court procedures when a victim is not notified of proceedings. It argues that conducting trials or sentencings without notifying the victim violates the CVRA. The document bears the name of Epstein attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal reference material or evidence regarding the violation of Epstein's victims' rights under the CVRA during the congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017756.jpg
This document is page 42 of 52 from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (vol. 835) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its interaction with Federal Rules of Evidence and Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 615 and Rule 43). The text argues for explicit procedural rules to protect a victim's right to attend trials, referencing the Oklahoma City bombing trial as a failure of the previous system. The document bears the name of David Schoen (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a legal file produced during congressional investigations into the handling of the Epstein case, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights under the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017746.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen, appearing to be part of a House Oversight investigation. It contains an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32. The text argues that probation officers should be required to seek out victim information for presentence reports and quotes Senator Kyl to support the argument that victims have a broad right to be heard in person during sentencing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017744.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed changes to Federal Rule 32 regarding the definition of a 'victim' and the procedures for waiving a jury trial. It argues that victims should be heard before a court approves a non-jury trial. The document bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' (an attorney known for representing Jeffrey Epstein) at the bottom and includes a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of evidence or materials reviewed by the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017741.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 B.Y.U. Law Review article (page 27 of 52 in the submission) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the constitutional rights of victims and the public to attend criminal trials in the local community (vicinage) under Article III, the First Amendment, and the Sixth Amendment. The text argues that victims have a compelling interest in observing proceedings and should have the right to be heard regarding venue transfer decisions under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log dated February 28, 2019, showing activity by attorney David Schoen. Schoen was researching legal articles related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Sixth Amendment, specifically accessing a 2005 BYU Law Review article. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity