HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg

1.9 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal review article excerpt / exhibit
File Size: 1.9 MB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on closed-circuit transmission of trials for victims and the right to be heard at sentencing for petty offenses. The text argues that the CVRA necessitates changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to ensure victim participation. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely used as an exhibit or reference in legal proceedings or congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (likely regarding CVRA violations).

People (4)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney
Name appears at the bottom of the document, suggesting he submitted this document as an exhibit or reference.
Paul G. Cassell Author/Source
Cited in footnote 342 regarding 'The Tale of Victims' Rights'.
Robert F. Hoyt Author/Source
Cited in footnote 342 regarding 'The Tale of Victims' Rights'.
Jo Thomas Journalist/Source
Cited in footnote 342 for a N.Y. Times article.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
B.Y.U.L. Rev.
Brigham Young University Law Review, the source publication of the text.
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765'.
N.Y. Times
Cited in footnote 342.
Legal Times
Cited in footnote 342.

Timeline (3 events)

2005
Publication of the BYU Law Review article.
Brigham Young University
December 23, 1996
Publication of article 'The Tale of Victims' Rights' in Legal Times.
Unknown
January 30, 1997
Publication of article 'Trial to Be Shown in Oklahoma for Victims' in N.Y. Times.
New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in relation to the bombing case and trial location transfers.

Relationships (1)

David Schoen Legal Discovery/Submission House Oversight Committee
Schoen's name appears on a document stamped with HOUSE_OVERSIGHT Bates number.

Key Quotes (3)

"The CVRA commands that victims be made participants in the federal criminal process and thus requires significant changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg
Quote #1
"The CVRA gives a 'victim' the right to be heard at sentencing."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg
Quote #2
"One such reasonable procedure would appear to be closed-circuit transmission of court proceedings to a facility sufficiently large to accommodate all the victims."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,240 characters)

Page 51 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *922
(b) Closed-Circuit Transmission for Victims. In order to permit victims of crime to watch criminal trial proceedings, the court may authorize closed-circuit televising of the proceedings for viewing by victims or other persons the court determines have a compelling interest in doing so.
The Rationale:
The CVRA grants victims the right to attend trials, as noted previously in connection with proposed Rule 43.1. 340 At the same time, however, the CVRA recognizes that in situations with numerous victims, the court may have to craft "a reasonable procedure" to protect victims' rights. 341 One such reasonable procedure would appear to be closed-circuit transmission of court proceedings to a facility sufficiently large to accommodate all the victims. This was the procedure followed in the Oklahoma City bombing case. 342
[*923] The proposed rule would authorize such transmission in appropriate cases. The language for the proposed rule comes from 42 U.S.C. 10608(a), which authorizes closed-circuit transmissions "notwithstanding any provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to the contrary" in cases in which a proceeding has been transferred more than 350 miles - as was the case with the Oklahoma City bombing trial. In light of the CVRA's mandate that the court must always craft "a reasonable procedure" to protect the rights of multiple victims, there is no compelling reason to tie the device to such geographical circumstances. The proposed rule authorizes courts to allow such transmissions in any appropriate case.
Rule 58 - Victims and Petty Offenses
The Proposal:
Courts should hear from victims regarding sentences in petty cases as follows:
Rule 58. Petty Offenses and Other Misdemeanors.
...
(3) Sentencing. The court must give the defendant an opportunity to be heard in mitigation and then proceed immediately to sentencing. The court must also give victims an opportunity to be heard. The court may, however, postpone sentencing to allow the probation service to investigate or to permit either party to submit additional information.
The Rationale:
The CVRA gives a "victim" the right to be heard at sentencing. The CVRA defines "victim" as including anyone who is directly and proximately harmed by "a Federal offense." 343 The Act does not limit those offenses to felonies or misdemeanors. Accordingly, a victim has a right to be heard at sentencing for any petty offense, as would be reflected in the proposed rule.
[*924]
Conclusion
The CVRA commands that victims be made participants in the federal criminal process and thus requires significant changes to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This Article has provided one possible and comprehensive way to implement that congressional command with specific language and supporting analysis for each change. Undoubtedly there are other ways of
340 See supra notes 277-308 and accompanying text.
341 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(d)(2).
342 See Paul G. Cassell & Robert F. Hoyt, The Tale of Victims' Rights, Legal Times, Dec. 23, 1996, at 32; Jo Thomas, Trial to Be Shown in Oklahoma for Victims, N.Y. Times, Jan. 30, 1997, at A14.
343 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(e).
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document