SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00010248.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from the case USA v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It records a discussion between the Judge and defense attorneys (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Sternheim) regarding a juror who had posted on social media and was a victim of sexual abuse himself. The defense argues that the juror's history and desire to be on an 'interesting' jury involving sexual abuse victims impact his ability to be impartial, and they discuss whether he followed court instructions during voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00010247.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 11, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues that a juror's post-trial behavior contradicts his claim of wanting privacy regarding his own sexual abuse. Everdell cites the juror's public Facebook posts about serving on the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and his direct comments to victim Annie Farmer as evidence that he wanted to be known as a victim and a "champion of sexual abuse." The Court acknowledges the need to question the juror about these apparent contradictions.
DOJ-OGR-00010246.jpg
This is page 31 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 11, 2022. Defense attorneys Sternheim and Everdell are arguing with the Judge regarding the scope of questioning for a juror who allegedly failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The defense is pushing to question the juror about his public statements to reporters and a specific post directed to victim Annie Farmer, while the Judge refuses to allow questions about internal jury deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00010245.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 11, 2022, detailing a colloquy during jury selection for a case involving sexual abuse of a minor. The judge denies a request for specific follow-up questions to a potential juror, reasoning that the defense had not made similar requests for another juror and that core questions of fairness had been addressed. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, then challenges the judge on whether the juror was adequately questioned about the specific, sensitive nature of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00010244.jpg
This document is page 29 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that a juror's history of sexual abuse (involving a stepbrother and a friend) is relevant to establishing bias, as it may align with victim testimony heard during the trial. The Court denies Everdell's request to ask the juror specific questions about their therapy and trauma, citing that the defense failed to propose comparable questions during the original jury selection (voir dire).
DOJ-OGR-00010242.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of 'Juror 50' regarding whether their personal history of sexual abuse affected their ability to be fair and impartial during the trial. Following the questioning, the Court initiates a sidebar conference where attorney Ms. Moe proposes a follow-up question.
DOJ-OGR-00010241.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 11, 2022, involving post-trial questioning of a juror regarding potential bias. The judge asks the juror if their personal experience with prior sexual abuse affected their ability to be impartial, assess witness credibility, or if they held bias against Ms. Maxwell or in favor of the government. The juror consistently denies any bias or inability to judge the evidence solely on its merits.
DOJ-OGR-00010239.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a juror about their past sexual abuse and their decision to be open about it, which was inspired by victims' testimony during the trial. The questioner specifically references the voir dire process that occurred on November 16, 2021, where the juror was initially questioned based on a questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00010238.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures testimony from a witness (likely a juror, based on context regarding a questionnaire) defending themselves against potential criminal charges for failing to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The witness argues it was an 'honest mistake' and claims they did not realize their family or friends would learn about the abuse through their subsequent interview or the case proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00010237.jpg
This document is a court transcript from March 11, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness about their public statements regarding a personal history of sexual abuse. The witness reconciles their claim of not usually discussing the abuse with the fact they gave media interviews on the topic after a trial, explaining they only did so to provide context for their perspective on jury deliberations. The witness denies any intent to deceive the court to get on the jury or to seek press attention for their abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010236.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the questioning of a witness (likely a juror) regarding their failure to disclose a history of sexual abuse on 'question 48' of a jury questionnaire. The witness claims they were distracted and misread the question options ('yes self' vs 'yes friend or family').
DOJ-OGR-00010235.jpg
This document is page 20 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It captures the cross-examination of a witness regarding their completion of a questionnaire. The witness admits to skimming questions and skipping sections based on 'if yes' prompts, claiming they were distracted or rushing, while the interrogator challenges the consistency of this claim against the witness's apparent adherence to instructions.
DOJ-OGR-00010233.jpg
This document is page 18 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details a colloquy between the Judge (Q) and a Juror (A) regarding the juror's lack of diligence in filling out the jury questionnaire. The juror admits to rushing because they did not believe they would be chosen and compares the experience to not wanting to be the last student finishing a test in school.
DOJ-OGR-00010232.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the questioning of a witness about their answers on a jury selection questionnaire. The examiner probes whether the witness, who has a history of sexual abuse, intentionally provided inaccurate answers to get selected for the jury, which the witness denies. The witness also recounts the timeline of being summoned for jury duty and filling out the questionnaire on November 4th.
DOJ-OGR-00010231.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). A witness, likely a juror being questioned post-trial, explains why they answered 'no' to question 25 on a jury questionnaire regarding being a victim of a crime, despite having a history of sexual abuse. The witness states they did not view themselves as a victim at the time and denies trying to manipulate their way onto the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00010230.jpg
This document is a transcript of legal testimony where an unnamed witness is being questioned about a questionnaire they previously filled out. The witness states they became aware of an inaccurate answer they provided only after an article was published in The Independent. They also specify that they first learned the questionnaire contained a question about sexual abuse history during a separate interview with Daily Mail reporter Laura Collins.
DOJ-OGR-00010229.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court hearing filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). A witness (likely a juror) is being questioned about an inaccurate answer provided on a jury questionnaire (Question 48A). The witness claims the error was an 'inadvertent mistake' caused by skimming the question too fast while being distracted by noise, audiovisual delays, and emotional distress from a recent breakup.
DOJ-OGR-00010228.jpg
This document is page 13 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330. It features a dialogue between a judge ('Q') and a juror ('A') regarding the juror's failure to disclose a stepbrother's criminal history on a questionnaire (specifically questions 48A and 49B). The juror explains the omission was because they didn't initially consider the stepbrother 'family' but affirms that this history would not affect their ability to serve impartially.
DOJ-OGR-00010227.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features an interrogation of a juror regarding why they rushed through their jury questionnaire and failed to disclose relevant information. The juror admits that, had they answered question 49 correctly, they would have disclosed that their stepbrother and his friend were accused of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a potential juror regarding their answers on a juror questionnaire. The individual clarifies that their experience with sexual abuse was not what they considered when answering about being a victim of a crime, stating they no longer identify as a victim and can serve as a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010223.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding dated March 11, 2022. An unnamed individual clarifies their answer on a questionnaire from November 4, 2021, stating they were abused as a child by a family member and a friend of that member. The individual reveals they first disclosed this to their mother in high school, who then reported it to the police, but no official paperwork was ever received.
DOJ-OGR-00010222.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a witness or potential juror regarding a jury selection questionnaire they completed on November 4, 2021. The inquiry specifically focuses on question 48, which pertains to whether the individual, their friends, or family have ever been victims of sexual harassment or assault.
DOJ-OGR-00010221.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the beginning of an examination of a witness, identified as Juror 50, who has been duly sworn. The court instructs the witness on how to answer questions, specifically warning them not to reveal any information about jury deliberations or their personal thought processes during those deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00010220.jpg
This document contains page 5 of a court transcript from March 11, 2022, filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The transcript records the Court granting 'use immunity' to 'Juror 50' after the juror asserted their Fifth Amendment privilege. The judge explains that Juror 50 must testify truthfully and will not be prosecuted for their testimony unless they commit perjury, after which Juror 50 is called to the witness stand.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity