This document is a court transcript from June 15, 2021, in which a judge expresses profound frustration with the inhumane and mismanaged conditions at the MCC and MDC federal prisons in New York. The judge describes the facilities as being 'run by morons' and lurching from crisis to crisis, such as gun smuggling related to Jeffrey Epstein. While addressing an inmate, Ms. Days, the judge states that the conditions she endured were disgusting and inhuman, and wishes they could release her but is legally bound to a sentence of at least five years.
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ms. Days (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on June 15, 2021. Ms. Days speaks about her rehabilitation efforts, including the RDAP program, and expresses remorse, after which the Judge states that he is legally bound to impose a mandatory five-year (60-month) sentence despite finding her eloquent and educated. The document mentions Ms. Days' time spent in the SHU (Special Housing Unit).
This document is a court transcript of testimony from an unnamed female inmate detailing inhumane conditions at the MCC facility. The speaker describes freezing in her cell for over seven months, contracting COVID-19 on April 20, 2020, and being subsequently neglected in a disciplinary room without water or proper medical care. Her condition became so severe, exacerbated by receiving the wrong medication, that she was unable to participate in her own bail hearing.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on June 15, 2021. It contains a first-person account of inhumane conditions at a detention facility, including a 14-day lockdown in February 2020 where inmates were denied sanitary products and showers, and a 'feces flood' incident where inmates were forced to clean raw sewage with their hands. The speaker also describes a 10-day lockdown following the death of George Floyd.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated June 15, 2021, detailing a portion of the sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Days. After counsel for the government suggests a 60-month sentence is appropriate, Ms. Days addresses the judge. She describes the extreme hardship of her incarceration since 2019, particularly at the MCC facility during the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, which she claims was significantly more difficult than her time at MDC.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on June 15, 2021. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, is arguing on behalf of their client, Ms. Days, emphasizing her good conduct while incarcerated. The speaker highlights that Ms. Days spent 75 days in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) without any disciplinary infractions ('tickets'), arguing that this experience has already served as a significant punishment and deterrent.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on June 15, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). An attorney is arguing that the conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) over the prior 14 months have been 'inhumane, cruel and harsh,' comparing them unfavorably to prisons in Mexico or El Salvador. The attorney references a client named Ms. Days and cites Judge Oetken's ruling in U.S. v. Gonzalez to argue for sentencing credit based on these harsh conditions.
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on June 15, 2021. The speaker, likely a defense attorney, argues that the defendant is engaging in positive intellectual growth by reading books by Coates and Baldwin, and highlights her strong family support system. The speaker also strongly condemns the conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) during the Covid-19 lockdowns, describing the last 18-19 months of detention as 'inhumane'.
This document is a court transcript from a sentencing hearing on June 15, 2021, for a defendant named Ms. Days on her fourth felony narcotics offense. Her attorney, Mr. Donaldson, argues for a 60-month sentence, which is the statutory minimum and three months below the 63-month recommendation from the probation department. The guideline range for the offense was 63 to 78 months.
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Days, dated June 15, 2021. The defendant confirms waiving her right to be physically present in the courtroom, opting to appear via CourtCall, while the government prosecutor, Mr. Chiuchiolo, states they will rely on their written sentencing submission. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, indicating it was released via a Department of Justice records request.
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on June 15, 2021, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a dialogue between the Court, defense attorney Mr. Donaldson, and the defendant, Ms. Days. The discussion centers on Ms. Days waiving her right to be physically present in the courtroom for her sentencing, opting instead to proceed via video or telephone conference under the CARES Act.
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) held on June 15, 2021. The Court reviews sentencing parameters, including a 40-year statutory maximum and $5 million fine, and lists reviewed documents such as a presentence report by Officer Sandra Vella Garcia, a plea agreement, and sentencing memos from both the government and defense attorney Mr. Donaldson. Attorneys Mr. Chiuchiolo (Government) and Mr. Donaldson (Defense) confirm there are no other written submissions to review.
This document is a court transcript from a sentencing hearing on June 15, 2021, for defendant Tiffany Days in the case United States of America v. Tiffany Days. The hearing, conducted via videoconference, begins with appearances from the government prosecutor, Nicholas Chiuchiolo, and defense counsel, Xavier R. Donaldson. The judge confirms the case details and outlines the charge to which Ms. Days has pleaded guilty—conspiracy to distribute narcotics—and begins to discuss the statutory minimum sentence.
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a videoconference hearing held on April 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Tiffany Days (Case No. 19 CR 0619). Tiffany Days was one of the prison guards charged with falsifying records on the night Jeffrey Epstein died. Notably, the header indicates this document was filed on June 15, 2021, as Document 300 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the case number for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting this transcript was used as an exhibit or filing in the Maxwell trial.
This document is the final page (13 of 13) of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Sternheim (Defense) noting rising COVID rates at the MDC facility, and the Court acknowledging availability (presumably of vaccines or testing) at the MDC before adjourning the session. Ms. Moe represents the government.
This document is page 12 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The judge thanks and discharges the jury, acknowledging their service during the pandemic. Following the jury's dismissal, the court and counsel (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Sternheim) discuss post-verdict logistics, including a briefing schedule and the presentence report, concluding with Ms. Sternheim requesting a court order for Ms. Maxwell to receive a COVID-19 booster shot.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the dismissal of a jury after a unanimous verdict. The judge confirms the verdict with two individual jurors, Juror No. 119 and Juror No. 7, before formally dismissing the entire jury. The judge provides explicit instructions that while jurors are free to discuss their own experiences, they are forbidden from revealing the identities of other jurors or any information under seal, including the identities of anonymous witnesses.
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The court reconvenes to hear the jury's verdict, and the judge instructs the courtroom on proper conduct. After confirming with the foreperson that a verdict has been reached, the judge begins to read it, announcing a 'Guilty' verdict on 'Count One'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. The judge discusses a sustained objection and proper redactions with counsel before the court recesses. After reconvening, the judge reads a note from the jury requesting the transcript of an individual named Larry Visoski.
This is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and the Court discussing a dispute over redactions in a witness testimony, specifically regarding an answer that lacked a 'predicate foundation.' The Judge reads a portion of the disputed testimony which mentions individuals going 'their separate ways' and explicitly names 'Ghislaine'.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the judge, Ms. Moe, and Ms. Sternheim about the schedule for ongoing jury deliberations, including over the New Year's holiday. The parties agree on the schedule and the specific language of the instructions to be given to the jury, ensuring jurors know how to report hardships and are not pressured to reach a verdict.
This document is page 4 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Judge regarding the jury's deliberation schedule over the New Year holidays (Jan 1 and 2). The Judge insists on a strict schedule to minimize the risk of trial delays caused by potential COVID-19 quarantine requirements.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a judge reads a note from the jury. The jury requests transcripts for five individuals who testified—Shawn, Cimberly Espinosa, Amanda Young, Jason Richards, and one with an unreadable name—and asks for clarification on whether they must continue deliberations through the holidays of 12/31 and 1/1. The judge also prepares to discuss a private juror conflict with counsel at a sealed sidebar conference.
This document is a short court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It records the end of a day's proceedings where the judge confirms with counsel, Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim, that there are no further matters and adjourns the court until 9:00 a.m. on December 29, 2021.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity