This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief procedural exchange immediately before a luncheon recess where the Judge (The Court) confirms with Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) that there are no matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The header indicates that a witness named 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) was previously under cross-examination.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning confirms that Farmer met with FBI agents Kuyrkendall and Slater at their home in November 2006, where the agents took notes and wrote a report. The transcript concludes with the judge announcing a lunch break for the court and jury.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger regarding a 2006 FBI interview. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy between the witness's current memory and an FBI report stating that a person named Maria was originally supposed to accompany Annie to New Mexico.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a trip the witness took to New Mexico, where they encountered a person named Ghislaine, and probes inconsistencies in the witness's memory regarding the date of a meeting with the FBI, which they recall as being in either 2006 or 2007.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the accuracy of the witness's memory regarding a trip to Thailand that occurred 25 years prior, which the witness recalled by associating it with their birthday. The transcript also records a legal objection by Ms. Pomerantz, which was overruled by the court, and mentions that the witness had previously discussed the trip dates with a Mr. Baker.
This document is page 118 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), focusing on how she reconstructed her memory of a specific trip occurring in April 1996 by referencing the movie 'Primal Fear' and her prom. The page concludes with an objection from Ms. Pomerantz regarding mischaracterization by the defense.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning focuses on establishing a timeline of events in April by referencing the release date of the movie "Primal Fear" (April 3rd) and the date of a prom (late April). The witness confirms communicating this information in writing to an unnamed male.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Ms. Farmer's prior communications with Mike Baker, a journalist for The New York Times. Ms. Farmer confirms she had email exchanges and gave an interview to Mr. Baker, and that one of the topics discussed was the timing of her trip to New Mexico.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions the witness about the lack of journal entries regarding a trip to New Mexico and suggests her memory is reconstructed based on internet research about the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear'. The witness maintains that the movie confirmed her existing memory of the timeline. The page concludes with the introduction of exhibit AF-8.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's memory of a trip to New Mexico, which they believe occurred in April 1996. A. Farmer admits to having very little memory of how the trip was planned and confirms they have no journal entries from that period to refresh their recollection.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning establishes that the government only possesses photocopies of the witness's journal, not the physical copy. The witness confirms there are no journal entries regarding a trip to New Mexico, including any expressions of excitement or plans to meet 'Maria's boss'.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony centers on verifying a specific page of a journal (Exhibit 604/AF-1) that the witness provided to the government as evidence.
This document is page 107 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger regarding a journal entry written on January 25, 1996. The questioning focuses on Farmer's conflicting descriptions of Jeffrey Epstein's behavior in a movie theater at that time, noting she described it simultaneously as 'weird,' 'normal,' and 'not a big deal.'
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer regarding a journal entry they made about a 'movie theater incident'. The questioner probes the witness's state of mind and their written description of the event, highlighting statements where the witness seemed to be rationalizing or justifying their experience.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on Farmer's past trips to Mexico and New York, their feelings about New York, a 'movie theater incident,' and a journal entry in which Farmer recorded their impressions of Epstein as being 'down to earth and easy to talk to'.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Counsel, Ms. Menninger, raises an issue with redactions and the court addresses a 'terminological issue' regarding the labeling of exhibit AF1, which overlaps with Government Exhibit 603. The court decides to temporarily admit the full exhibit under seal to allow the questioning to proceed.
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving Ms. Menninger questioning A. Farmer. The testimony focuses on entries made by Farmer after returning from New York, specifically confirming details about attending 'Phantom of the Opera', visiting Mr. Epstein's home, meeting Maria's boyfriend, and going cross-country skiing during a trip. Ms. Pomerantz also addresses 'Your Honor' during the proceeding.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, specifically regarding the admission of a journal entry (Exhibit AF1, Bates AFarmer10472) written by Farmer before a trip to New York. The government, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, agrees that no redactions are necessary for this specific page.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions Farmer about journals she kept during a trip to Thailand and her senior year, as well as her use of these journals during 2020 media appearances. The defense then moves to introduce 'Defendant's Exhibit AF1,' claiming it contains a page omitted from the government's corresponding exhibit.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about the consistency of her journaling habits during high school, specifically referencing journals from trips to Thailand and New York. The attorney also challenges the witness regarding a statement made to the government in September 2019 about maintaining a journal throughout high school.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a personal journal that Farmer used to refresh their memory before a meeting with the government in September 2019. The questioner confirms this fact and notes that the government has already introduced specific pages from the journal as evidence.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about a trip to New York during her junior year (age 16) and whether she used a journal to refresh her memory during a September 2019 meeting with the government. Farmer contests the interpretation of a summary document presented by the defense regarding exactly how she determined her age at the time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity