SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016175.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in a legal case. The statement aims to undermine the credibility of a witness named Kate by portraying her as an ambitious socialite who willingly and eagerly maintained a decade-long relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, even while he was incarcerated. The speaker suggests Kate's testimony against Ghislaine is suspect, especially since she only 'pointed the finger' after Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00016173.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. The statement describes a girl named Annie who, at age 16, met Epstein in New York hoping for career support and later met Ghislaine for the first and only time in Santa Fe. The speaker asserts that nothing criminal occurred during the Santa Fe meeting and that Annie was above the age of consent in New Mexico at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00016172.jpg
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. She argues that a key witness, an actress named Annie, fabricated or embellished her story against the defendant, Ghislaine, only after Epstein's death and for financial gain, having received $5 million from the Epstein compensation fund. The attorney urges the jury to critically examine the witness's testimony, suggesting it is inconsistent and motivated by money.
DOJ-OGR-00016171.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the background of a witness named 'Jane,' describing her artistic upbringing, attendance at the Epstein-sponsored Interlochen program, and visits to Epstein's Palm Beach home with her mother and brothers. The defense argues that while Jane accepted flights from Epstein, nothing inappropriate occurred during their interactions, and notes she only decided to involve herself in the case after Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00016170.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in a legal case involving claims against Epstein. Sternheim argues that the claims, unlike those in the September 11th compensation fund, are based on unreliable memories that will be challenged during the trial. She begins to describe the relationship between Epstein and an accuser named Jane, portraying him as a generous benefactor who financially supported Jane's musical education and living expenses in New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016168.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on August 10, 2022. A lawyer, likely Ms. Sternheim, argues about the timing of a witness's testimony and the non-privileged nature of information provided in 2020, mentioning that a lawyer named Mr. Scarola handled interrogatories. Another lawyer, Ms. Comey, and the Judge discuss whether these are arguments for the jury, with the Judge noting the contention that the story has changed over time due to the involvement of civil lawyers.
DOJ-OGR-00016167.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a discussion between the Court and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding opening statements. The Judge overrules an objection but questions the defense's basis for suggesting attorneys told witnesses what to say. Mr. Pagliuca argues that in 2008, a witness named Carolyn provided detailed interrogatories, depositions, and a complaint that did not include Ms. Maxwell, implying her later inclusion may have been influenced.
DOJ-OGR-00016165.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues regarding the admissibility of communications between witnesses' lawyers (specifically mentioning Mr. Scarola) and the government, citing an email where Scarola suggested ten interview topics for a witness named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications and proffers are privileged or if they can be used as evidence regarding the 'cultivating of stories'.
DOJ-OGR-00016164.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that lawyers representing witnesses should be callable as witnesses themselves because they attended 'proffer sessions' and coordinated with the government to build civil cases and settlements. The Judge prohibits Sternheim from mentioning this potential testimony in her opening statement because the defense failed to file a specific brief requesting permission to call these lawyers as witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00016162.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, filed on August 10, 2022. Sternheim argues that the indictment against her client lacks sufficient evidence and eyewitness testimony, while portraying Jeffrey Epstein as a complex, manipulative, and secretive individual. She suggests Epstein's accusers had a financial motive, stating they have received "millions of dollars" after making their allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00016161.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a trial dated August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, delivers part of an opening statement, arguing that the testimony of four upcoming female witnesses is unreliable because their memories could have been created by suggestive activities, media influence, and the incentive of monetary gain. Opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to one of Ms. Sternheim's claims, and the court instructs the jury to disregard the comment.
DOJ-OGR-00016160.jpg
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the four accusers, using pseudonyms, have fabricated or altered their stories decades after the alleged events, particularly after Epstein's death, in order to get a "payday." She urges the jury to focus on the themes of memory, manipulation, and money, and states that expert testimony will be presented to show how memory is unreliable and can be contaminated over time.
DOJ-OGR-00016159.jpg
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim. She describes Jeffrey Epstein's private jets as a commuting service for a diverse group of influential people and clarifies the nature of Ghislaine Maxwell's relationship with Epstein, stating that she remained his employee after their personal companionship ended. Sternheim concludes by telling the court that the case will focus on the testimony of four women.
DOJ-OGR-00016158.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022. It describes Jeffrey Epstein's charismatic personality and asserts that Ghislaine Maxwell was his employee tasked with managing his luxury real estate portfolio, which operated like 'boutique hotels.' The text details Epstein's seasonal movements between Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the Virgin Islands, and notes that he spent time and traveled with other women independent of Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016157.jpg
This document is a transcript of the opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that while four women will testify against Maxwell, the evidence will not support the charges. She portrays Maxwell as an accomplished and educated woman, urging the jury not to be biased by her privileged lifestyle, and introduces Jeffrey Epstein as a successful and philanthropic man whom Maxwell met in the 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00016156.jpg
This document is a single page (page 46 of 106) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text captures a brief procedural exchange where Ms. Comey assures the Court she will clarify she is referring to witnesses, followed by the Judge's acknowledgment. The page ends abruptly with a 'Continued on next page' marker.
DOJ-OGR-00016155.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing a sidebar conference. Prosecutor Ms. Comey objects to Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim's opening statement, arguing it violates a pretrial ruling by suggesting the government is targeting the defendant. The Court rules that while the defense cannot question the prosecution's motives, they are permitted to argue that witnesses are treating the defendant as a 'scapegoat' or 'stand-in' (likely for Jeffrey Epstein, referred to as the 'empty chair').
DOJ-OGR-00016154.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, containing part of an opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. She argues that her client, Ghislaine, is being unfairly targeted as a 'scapegoat' and 'convenient stand-in' for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein to satisfy victims seeking justice. The transcript shows another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, making objections that are overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00016153.jpg
This document is an excerpt from an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in a trial, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details how Jeffrey Epstein manipulated individuals, including Ghislaine, over 15 to 25 years ago. The statement also discusses how Epstein's estate established a compensation fund from which accusers received millions of dollars, and how these women easily included Ghislaine Maxwell in their claims, implying the focus should remain on Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016152.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, specifically the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the jury must focus solely on Maxwell's alleged actions, not Epstein's, and contends the government's case is built on the unreliable testimony of four accusers whose memories have been corrupted over time and who are motivated by money.
DOJ-OGR-00016151.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the transition from the prosecution's opening statement to the defense's, delivered by Ms. Sternheim. Ms. Sternheim begins her defense by arguing that Maxwell is being unfairly scapegoated for the actions of Jeffrey Epstein, emphasizing that while Epstein's conduct is central to the case, Maxwell is a separate individual who should not be conflated with him.
DOJ-OGR-00016149.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case. The prosecution outlines its case against the defendant, detailing the evidence and testimony to be presented, including from victims' relatives, Epstein's staff, pilots, and law enforcement. The statement alleges the defendant's close involvement with Epstein in the abuse of underage victims, citing travel, communications, and rules imposed by the defendant to maintain secrecy, as well as evidence found during searches of Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00016148.jpg
This document is page 38 of a court transcript from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines that victims, including 'Jane,' will testify about the sexual abuse they suffered, specifically highlighting the defendant's active role in grooming, touching, and facilitating the abuse alongside Jeffrey Epstein. It also addresses the fact that witnesses received financial compensation but emphasizes that the money does not negate the trauma they endured.
DOJ-OGR-00016147.jpg
This document is page 37 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (referenced as 'the defendant'), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's opening argument, describing a 'pyramid scheme of abuse' where the defendant recruited and groomed minors for Jeffrey Epstein under the guise of massage appointments. The text details specific charges, including transporting minors under age 17 across state lines and sex trafficking of minors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity