Michael Horowitz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
FBI
|
Oversight investigated entity |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Geoffrey Berman
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-14 | N/A | Release of a report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, which is cited in t... | N/A | View |
| 2018-06-14 | N/A | Release of the Justice Department Inspector General's report detailing a pattern of anti-Trump bi... | United States | View |
| 2018-06-14 | N/A | Release of Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on FBI actions. | Washington D.C. | View |
051.pdf
David Golden, a self-described whistleblower and former bridge inspector, filed a pro se motion to intervene in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. Golden alleges a vast conspiracy involving the USDOJ, Freemasonry, and politicians laundering money through bridge contracts, claiming commonality with the Epstein case via the abuse of 'prosecutorial discretion.' Judge Richard Berman hand-wrote 'Application respectfully denied' on the face of the motion on August 27, 2019.
EFTA00029471.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article from February 2019. The article discusses a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta's handling of the 2008 Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case. It highlights legislative efforts (the Inspector General Access Act) to transfer oversight of attorney misconduct from the OPR to the independent Office of Inspector General (OIG), citing the Epstein case as a catalyst for this reform due to concerns over OPR's lack of transparency and independence.
EFTA00027936.pdf
This document is an email chain involving US Attorney Geoffrey Berman and USANYS staff in the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death. It reveals that two correctional officers (Noel and Thomas) admitted to missing the 3am and 5am rounds, with one stating 'we messed up,' despite logs being signed indicating checks occurred. The document also notes that the BOP claimed the SHU camera had not been functioning since the Thursday prior to the death, and confirmed Epstein had been removed from suicide watch on July 29.
EFTA00017912.pdf
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced charges against federal correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas for falsifying records and conspiracy related to the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. The indictment alleges that the officers failed to perform mandatory checks on inmates in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) between 10:30 p.m. on August 9 and 6:30 a.m. on August 10, 2019, instead browsing the internet and sitting at their desks while falsifying count slips. Epstein committed suicide by hanging during this unmonitored period.
DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg
A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026620.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 2015 discussing the Iran Nuclear Deal. The primary email is from Terry (likely Terry Kafka) to a large distribution list, asking them to watch a Dennis Prager video. Notably, the recipient list includes 'jeff epstein' with the unredacted email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com', as well as his brother Mark Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026492.jpg
This document is an opinion article by David B. Rivkin Jr. and Elizabeth Price Foley, dated June 22, 2018, discussing the legal implications of alleged anti-Trump bias within the FBI on Robert Mueller's investigation. It cites Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report, highlighting specific instances of bias by FBI officials like Peter Strzok and the handling of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation versus the Clinton email probe. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of a congressional discovery batch.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026477.jpg
This document is an email thread from June 23, 2018, ending with a message from Jeffrey Epstein ('Jeffrey E.') to Steve Bannon. The thread originated with the sharing of an op-ed titled 'Mueller’s Fruit of the Poisonous Tree' by David Rivkin and Elizabeth Price Foley, to which Bannon initially replied 'Big deal.' Epstein responded with a high-importance email discussing the 'southern district,' 'money laundering,' and the opinion that 'flippers will dictate' the outcome.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026281.jpg
This document is an opinion article by Elizabeth Price Foley from June 22, 2018, presented as evidence to a House Oversight investigation (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026281). The author argues that the Special Counsel's investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was tainted by political bias within the FBI, citing Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report on anti-Trump text messages and actions by officials like Peter Strzok. The document makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273.jpg
This document is an email chain from June 23, 2018, initiated by Steve Bannon, who forwards a political article to 'jeevacation@gmail.com' with the comment "Big deal." The forwarded article, co-authored by David Rivkin Jr., argues that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is compromised by political bias, referencing a recent Inspector General report. The chain shows the article was passed from Andrew Grossman to David Rivkin before being sent to Bannon, indicating a circulation of political commentary among these individuals.
Inspector General Access Act
Support for the bill, arguing OIG is better situated to investigate misconduct due to independence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity